Scoliosis
Conditions
Brief summary
The construction methods of the same brace vary on an experiential basis according to who builds them, the prescriber, the characteristics of the patients and also the innovations introduced to ensure greater comfort for the patient. The closure of the brace or the way in which the two shells are fixed varies at the discretion of the orthopedic technician. Plastic materials have also changed. In addition, the use of the classic cast for the production of the negative model was gradually replaced by cad-cam technology. In some cases, modular constructions were introduced with respect to the customized one. All this has changed the classic corsets over time, even without changing their name / type, and according to the hypothesis that their effectiveness remained at least the same, if not even improved. There are no publications that have shown variations in efficacy that can be correlated with some of these stylistic variations. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether the various innovations and stylistic variations over time have had an effect on the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes in growing subjects suffering from spinal deformity treated with corsets at a specialized center.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Istituto Scientifico Italiano Colonna Vertebrale
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and/or dorsal hyperkyphosis, * age under 16 years at the start of observation, * brace prescription for more than 18 hours/day, * availability of radiographs of the entire spine while standing and in brace radiographs at 1 month or out of brace at 5 ± 2 months at the end growth after 48 hours without brace and at 1 year. * availability of compliance data * Risser between 0 and 4 at first assessment
Exclusion criteria
* All secondary causes of scoliosis * history of spinal fusion surgery * lack of one of the radiographic examinations required by the protocol
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in radiographic measurements | pre-treatment, in brace after a month from the start of wearing and without brace after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , after 48 hours without brace and 1 year later. | variation of Cobb degrees of the main curve in the frontal plane over time |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| HRQOL | pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later | measures of quality of life. The Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire (ISYQOL) measures the health-related quality of life of adolescents with spinal deformities. ISYQOL consists of 20 items, each scored 0, 1 or 2. In accordance with the Rasch analysis technique, used to develop the questionnaire, the ordinal ISYQOL total score is converted to an interval measure (i.e., ISYQOL measure), which is expressed on a 0%-100% scale (with 100% indicating high quality of life). |
| Treatment outcome | after an average period of 4 years +/-2 | variation of the main curve of at least 5 Cobb degrees, end treatment results: main curve \</=30 Cobb degrees, main curve \</=45 Cobb degrees, and main curve \>50 Cobb degrees |
| Treatment compliance | after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months, and after an average period of 4 years +/-2 | Treatment compliance measures: percentage of brace wearing declared and measured by heat sensors |
| Deformity clinical measures | pre-treatment, after a month from the start of brace wearing, after 5 ± 2 months,after an average period of 4 years +/-2 , and 1 year later | score on the evaluation of the aesthetic profile of the trunk (TRACE) |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed