Skip to content

ImmPACT Expanded Multiple Antigen Specific Endogenously Derived T Cells (MASE-T) to Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

Adoptive Transfer of ImmPACT Expanded Multiple Antigen Specific Endogenously Derived T Cells (MASE-T) in Combination With Lymphodepletion and Anti-PD-1 to Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04904185
Enrollment
8
Registered
2021-05-27
Start date
2021-09-17
Completion date
2024-06-07
Last updated
2025-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Melanoma

Keywords

Adoptive Cell Therapy, Immune Therapy, Multiple Antigen Specific Endogenously derived T cells

Brief summary

With the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors substantial improvements have been made in the treatment of malignant melanoma (MM). Despite this still a a subset of patients, approximately 50 %, experience no response to therapy. One of the strategies to overcome these obstacles have been ACT with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Most TIL based ACT products are non-specifically expanded providing growth preference to co-infiltrated virus specific T cells, and it is currently challenging to expand T cells in an antigen-specific manner, while at the same time obtaining the ideal functional characteristics for specific and strong tumour-killing capacity with sufficient persistence. In this phase I trial artificial antigen-presenting scaffolds for antigen-driven T cell expansion are used. These scaffolds will generate a MASE-T cell product enriched for selected specificities towards antigens known to be expressed by melanoma cells The aim of the study is to demonstrate that treatment with af MASE-T cell product i safe and feasible. Further the study will elucidate whether treament with the MASE-T cell product leads to objective responses and improves progression free survival (PFS).

Detailed description

There are around 350-400 new cases of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) per year in Denmark. MM is a very aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Traditional oncological treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy have a poor effect, and the 5-year overall survival has hitherto been less than 10 %.Substantial improvements have been made in the treatment of MM; especially immunotherapy is showing promising results with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibodies administered as standard treatment in the frontline. The 5-year overall survival has now reached 52 %, 44 % and 26 % in nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab respectively. However, a subset of patients - approximately 50 % experience no response to therapy, with clear primary resistance. One of the strategies to overcome these obstacles have been ACT with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). A crucial condition for optimal ACT based on TILs is the generation of sufficient numbers of tumourreactive T cells. However, the expansion of TILs requires extensive ex vivo culturing often at the cost of T cell differentiation and functional activity. Most TIL based ACT products are non-specifically expanded providing growth preference to co-infiltrated virus specific T cells, and it is currently challenging to expand T cells in an antigen-specific manner, while at the same time obtaining the ideal functional characteristics for specific and strong tumour-killing capacity with sufficient persistence. Recent data suggest that the majority of tumour specific T cells responsible for tumour rejection under CPI are recruited from peripheral blood and lymph system, while not present in the tumour prior to treatment. This is supported by the finding that most tumour resident T cells are dysfunctional. To overcome the current limitations in the treatment of malignant melanoma artificial antigen-presenting scaffolds for antigen-driven T cell expansion, generating a MASE-T cell product enriched for selected specificities towards antigens known to be expressed by melanoma cells has been designed. The antigen-scaffolds will ensuring optimal T cell stimulation by mimicking the in vivo stimulation of T cells by dendritic cells in the lymph nodes. The scaffolds contain both the antigen specific element - in the form of a peptide-MHC molecule and cytokine (IL2 and IL21), to provide growth and functional signals to the antigen specific T cell. As a result of this T cell expansion strategy, we can obtain a T cell product enriched for tumourantigen specific T cells. Superior functional activity towards tumor cells and antigen recognition compared to conventional T cell expansion strategies has been demonstrated in-vitro. Importantly, antigen-specific T cells in the MASE-T cell product possess a 'younger' phenotype, which has previously been described to correlate with improved in vivo persistence. The study is a phase 1, non-randomized study. The trial will be conducted in two parts (A and B). Patients will be treated as followed: * Part A (6 patients): Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3, -2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3) followed by i.v. infusion of the MASE-T product on day 0. If the production of the MASE-T cell product was feasible for the majority (≥50%) of patients intended to treat in Arm A and the toxicity was acceptable, six patients will further be included in part B. * Part B (6 patients): Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3, -2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day i.v on day -4, -3) followed by i.v infusion of the MASE-T product on day 0. Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg will be administered on day -1 and day +21. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the MASE-T treatment alone or in combination with Pembrolizumab in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). The secondary objectives are to evaluate T cell profile and persistence in vivo from tumor biopsies and blood samples as well as evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the treatment according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST. In addition, best overall response (BOR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) will be monitored.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 is administered i.v. on day -4, -3 and -2

DRUGFludarabine Phosphate

Fludarabine Phosphate 30 mg/m2 is administered on day -4 and -3

BIOLOGICALMultiple Antigen Specific Endogenously derived T cells

Antigen specific, ex vivo expanded T cells derived from peripheral blood T cells

DRUGPembrolizumab

Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg is administered on day -1 and on day 21. The medicine is administered over 30 minutes

Sponsors

Technical University of Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Inge Marie Svane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

12 Patients will be indluced in two steps. * Part A (6 patients): Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3, -2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3) followed by i.v. infusion of the MASE-T product on day 0. If the production of the MASE-T cell product was feasible for the majority (\>50%) of patients intended to treat in Arm A and the toxicity was acceptable, six patients will further be included in part B. * Part B (6 patients): Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3, -2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day i.v on day -4, -3) followed by i.v infusion of the MASE-T product on day 0. Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg will be administered on day -1 and day +21.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 ≤ 75 2. Progressive disease on or after anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapy or progressive disease on or after anti PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapy 3. The patient has histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma 4. HLA-A2 positive 5. At least one measurable parameter according to RECIST version 1.1 guidelines 6. ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 7. No significant toxicity from previous cancer treatments (CTC ≤ 1) 8. Women of childbearing potential: Negative serum pregnancy test and must use effective contraception. This applies from screening and until 6 months after treatment. Birth control pills, spiral, depot injection with gestagen, subdermal implantation, hormonal vaginal ring and transdermal depot patch are all considered effective contraceptives 9. Men with female partner of childbearing potential must use effective contraception from screening and until 6 months after treatment. Effective contraceptives are as described above for the female partner. In addition, documented vasectomy and sterility or double barrier contraception are considered effective contraceptives 10. Signed statement of consent after receiving oral and written study information 11. Willingness to participate in the planned treatment and follow-up and capable of handling 12. The patient has met the following haematological and biochemical criteria: 1. AST and ALT ≤2,5 X ULN or ≤5 X ULN with liver metastases 2. Serum total bilirubin ≤1,5 X ULN or direct bilirubin ≤ ULN for patient with total bilirubin level \> 1,5 ULN 3. Serum creatinine ≤1,5 X ULN 4. ANC (Absolute Neutrophil Count) ≥1,000/mcL 5. Platelets ≥ 75,000 /mcL 6. Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL or ≥ 5.6 mmol/L

Exclusion criteria

1. Another malignancy or concurrent malignancy unless disease-free for 3 years 2. Requirement for immunosuppressive doses of systemic corticosteroids (\>10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive drugs within the last 3 weeks prior to screening 3. Prior treatment with adoptive transfer of Tumor Infiltrating T cells (TIL) 4. Grade 3-4 adverse events upon treatment with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors (only phase B) 5. The patient has CNS metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis 6. The patient has any condition that will interfere with patient compliance or safety (including but not limited to psychiatric or substance abuse disorders) 7. The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding 8. The patient has an active infection requiring systemic therapy 9. The patient has received a live virus vaccine within 30 days of planned start of therapy 10. Significant medical disorder according to investigator; e.g severe asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease, dysregulated heart disease or dysregulated diabetes mellitus. 11. Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs 12. Any significant active autoimmune disease 13. Severe allergy or anaphylactic reactions earlier in life 14. Known hypersensitivity to one of the active drugs or one or more of the excipients. 15. Unrelieved lower urinary tract obstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerability of the TreatmentThrough study completion, up to 2.8 years from begin of studyNumber of patients experiencing grade III or worse adverse events. The grading of adverse events was performed according to CTCAE ver. 5.0.
Number of Patients Excluded Due to Feasibility IssuesThrough study completion, up to 2.8 years from begin of studyNumber of patients excluded due to treatment related feasibility issues compared to the number of patients enrolled in the study.
Number of Patients Excluded Due to Safety IssuesThrough study completion, up to 2.8 years from begin of studyNumber of patients excluded due to treatment related safety issues compared to the number of patients enrolled in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Overall Response (BOR)The patients were evaluated every 6-12 weeks until study completion (minimum: 43 days, median: 69 days, maximum: 128 days)Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST 1.1) assessed by CT scan. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease: \>= 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions Stable disease: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A
Six patients were included in Part A. After inclusion 300 mL blood will be drawn from the patients for the production of the MASE-T cell product. Four days prior to MASE-T infusion the patient will receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3, -2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day i.v. on day -4, -3) followed by i.v. infusion of the MASE-T product on day 0. Cyclophosphamide: Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 is administered i.v. on day -4, -3 and -2 Fludarabine Phosphate: Fludarabine Phosphate 30 mg/m2 is administered on day -4 and -3 Multiple Antigen Specific Endogenously derived T cells: Antigen specific, ex vivo expanded T cells derived from peripheral blood T cells
6
Part B
No patients enrolled due to premature closure of the trial
0
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyExpansion failure10
Overall StudyLate response on prior treatment10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart BTotalPart A
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years61 years
HLA-A2*02:01 positive assessed by flow cytometry6 participants6 participants
Number of prior treatment lines3.5 lines of prior treatment3.5 lines of prior treatment
Performance status according to ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG PS 0
5 participants5 participants
Performance status according to ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG PS 1
1 participants1 participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
TET+ T cells in peripheral blood assessed by flow cytometry6 participants6 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 60 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 60 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Excluded Due to Feasibility Issues

Number of patients excluded due to treatment related feasibility issues compared to the number of patients enrolled in the study.

Time frame: Through study completion, up to 2.8 years from begin of study

Population: No patients were enrolled in part B due to premature closure of the trial

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part ANumber of Patients Excluded Due to Feasibility Issues1 Participants
Primary

Number of Patients Excluded Due to Safety Issues

Number of patients excluded due to treatment related safety issues compared to the number of patients enrolled in the study.

Time frame: Through study completion, up to 2.8 years from begin of study

Population: No patients were enrolled in part B due to premature closure of the trial

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part ANumber of Patients Excluded Due to Safety Issues0 Participants
Primary

Tolerability of the Treatment

Number of patients experiencing grade III or worse adverse events. The grading of adverse events was performed according to CTCAE ver. 5.0.

Time frame: Through study completion, up to 2.8 years from begin of study

Population: No patients were enrolled in part B due to premature closure of the trial

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part ATolerability of the Treatment6 Participants
Part BTolerability of the Treatment0 Participants
Secondary

Best Overall Response (BOR)

Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST 1.1) assessed by CT scan. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease: \>= 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions Stable disease: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study

Time frame: The patients were evaluated every 6-12 weeks until study completion (minimum: 43 days, median: 69 days, maximum: 128 days)

Population: No patients included in part B due to premature closure of the trial

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part ABest Overall Response (BOR)Stable disease3 Participants
Part ABest Overall Response (BOR)Progressive disease3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026