Skip to content

The Effects of Different Intensity Training on Dynamic and Static Balance of Elderly

The Effects of Different Intensity Training on Dynamic and Static Balance of Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04901520
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-05-25
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2020-01-25
Last updated
2021-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Aging

Keywords

Older adults, Dynamic Balance, Static Balance, Resistance Training, High-Intensity training, Moderate-Intensity Training, Low-Intensity Training

Brief summary

In this study, investigators tried to find a useful and safe way of training for the elderly population which can help this population to improve their fitness factors as fast as possible. investigators have tried to see if different intensity training has different effects on the dynamic and static balance of elderly women in different time points (4, 8, and 12 weeks). Investigators hypothesized that Higher intensity would be more effective to improve balance at different time points. The participants were trained twice per week and each session contain 4 exercises ( leg press, leg extension, leg curl, and seated calf raises) and the data have been collected at the pre-test and 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks of intervention.

Interventions

High Intensity Training group performed resistance training with the intensity of 80 - 90 % of 1RM with 4 - 6 repetition

Moderate Intensity Training group performed resistance training with the intensity of 65 - 75 % of 1RM with 8 - 10 repetition

Low Intensity Training group performed resistance training with the intensity of 50 - 60 % of 1RM with 12 - 14 repetition

Sponsors

Universiti Putra Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

3 intervention groups and one control group, assessed in 4 different times (baseline, 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks of intervention)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 65 years old and above. * Orientation to place, time, and person, able to follow the simple instructions, and perform the exercises. * Without any health problems that would interfere with their safety or ability to complete high and low-intensity training such as the occurrence of myocardial infarction in the past six months, recent heart attack, uncontrolled hypertension (Blood Pressure \>166/96 mm Hg), a broken leg in the past six months, diagnosed osteoporosis, and diagnosed stage three and four of heart failure.

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in regular balance or lower body resistance training during the past three months (at least twice per week). * The health issues that might confound the study results, including lower- body neuropathy, stroke within the past year, Parkinson's disease, diagnosed vestibular disorders, severe vision (self-rated vision as poor or very poor even when wearing glasses or contact lenses), and lower- extremity joint replacements. * Taking the regular medication's impairing balance ability (Antidepressants, Neuroleptics or Benzodiazepines) or muscle strength (Corticosteroids). * Elderly with dementia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in the Mean of Front Reach Test at 4, 8, and 12 weeksBaseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeksThe distance that subject can lean forward measured in centimetre (cm) with measuring tape. The higher score is better. The minimum is 5 cm and maximum 50 cm
Change from Baseline in the Mean of Lateral Reach Test at 4, 8, and 12 weeksBaseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeksThe distance that subject can lean to the side measured in centimetre (cm) with measuring tape. The higher score is better. Minimum is 5 cm and maximum is 50 cm
Change from Baseline in the Mean of One Leg Stand at 4, 8, and 12 weeksBaseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeksThe timed that subject can stand in 1 leg recorded in second using a stop watch. The higher score is better. minimum is 1 second and maximum is 30 second
Change from Baseline in the Mean of Tandem Stand Test at 4, 8, and 12 weeksBaseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeksThe timed that subject can stand one leg front and one leg back condition recorded in second using a stop watch. The higher score is better. Minimum is 1 second and maximum is 30 second

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026