Skip to content

Empower Neuromodulation System - Pilot Study for Anxiety Treatment

Pilot Evaluation of the Empower Neuromodulation System for Anxiety Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04901481
Enrollment
18
Registered
2021-05-25
Start date
2021-09-17
Completion date
2023-05-17
Last updated
2024-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effects of peripheral nerve stimulation on anxiety levels in participants with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). This is a pilot investigation in which participants will randomized (1:1) to the active or sham treatment.

Detailed description

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic, recurring condition that affects approximately 6.4 million American adults each year. GAD is one of the most common anxiety disorders and is costly to treat. First-line treatments for GAD include medication (e.g. SSRIs, SNRIs), cognitive behavioral therapy, or both in combination. Peripheral nerve stimulation via acupuncture has been shown to directly decrease clinical anxiety scores. The investigators have developed the Empower Neuromodulation System, a non-invasive, portable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device intended to stimulate peripheral nerves for the treatment of anxiety. In this study, a randomized, controlled study will be conducted in participants with GAD. Participants will self-administer twice daily treatments with the Empower device. In this pilot study, the primary endpoints will be feasibility and acceptability, with safety and effectiveness evaluated as exploratory endpoints.

Interventions

Peripheral nerve stimulation with the Empower device. The active and sham treatments only differ by the location of application on the body.

Sponsors

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Nebraska
CollaboratorOTHER
Theranova, L.L.C.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Research staff will not provide any details that would cause participants to become unblinded to the treatment groups.

Intervention model description

At enrollment, participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive either the active or sham treatment for the duration of the 6-week study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥19 years old * Current diagnosis of GAD per DSM-5 via M.I.N.I. assessment by clinician * Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) ≥18 * Negative urine pregnancy test at screening (females only) * Able to provide informed consent * Capable and willing to follow all study-related procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Has current (past 30 days) psychotic or bipolar disorder, homicidal ideation, psychiatric hospitalization, or moderate/severe substance use disorders per clinician assessment via M.I.N.I. * Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) ≥18 * PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) ≥51 * Exhibits suicidal intent as confirmed on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale-Revised (C-SSRS-R) with a Yes response to question 4 or question 5 or to question 6 in the past 3 months. * Changes in psychoactive medications in the past 30 days (including but not limited to psychotropic medications, thyroid hormone medication, steroids), with the exception of benzodiazepines * If regularly taking benzodiazepines, has had changes in benzodiazepine dosing in the past 30 days or average use \>2 days per week * Psychotherapy was initiated or discontinued in the past 30 days or psychotherapy modality was changes in the past 30 days * Has a history of epilepsy or a seizure disorder * Has been diagnosed with peripheral nerve damage of the arm or hand or has numbness or tingling in the arm or hand at least weekly * Is currently pregnant or breastfeeding, has been pregnant within the past 6 months or intends to become pregnant during the study period * Currently has an active implant and/or an electrical or neurostimulator device, including but not limited to cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, vagal neurostimulator, deep brain stimulator, spinal stimulator, sacral stimulator, bone growth stimulator, or cochlear implant * Has an electrically conductive metal object (e.g. jewelry) that cannot be removed from the upper extremities and will directly contact the gel electrodes of the Empower Neuromodulation System at the active or sham anatomic location * Has an open incision, wound, scar, active infection or otherwise compromised skin that will directly contact the gel electrodes of the Empower Neuromodulation System at either the active or sham anatomic location * Does not have daily access to an electrical outlet for charging the investigational device and associated smartphone * Has used of an investigational drug/device therapy within the past four weeks * Unable to provide informed written consent * Has any medical condition that would, in the opinion of the investigator, make the participant ineligible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Adherence6 weeksFeasibility as assessed via treatment adherence (treatment sessions administered as a percentage of total possible) for each participant
Usability6 weeksAcceptability as assessed via a usability assessment (System Usability Scale (SUS)). For the SUS, the score range is 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating the stimulation system's better usability. The survey includes 10 questions in which statements about the system are rated from Strongly disagree up to Strongly agree.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events6 weeksSafety assessment via device-related adverse events
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score From Baseline to 6weeks6 weeksAnxiety severity evaluation via clinician-administered Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score. For the HAM-A, the score range is 0 to 56, with a higher scoring meaning more severe anxiety.
Change in Participant-reported Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Score From Baseline to 6 Weeks6 weeksAnxiety severity evaluation via participant-reported Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) score from Baseline to 6 weeks. For the BAI, the score range is 0 to 63, with a higher scoring meaning more severe anxiety.
Effective Nerve Stimulation6 weeksThe percentage of treatment sessions that provide effective nerve stimulation as assessed via participant-reported confirmation of tingling sensation
Satisfaction With Treatment6 weeksThe overall satisfaction with treatment (via 100-mm Visual-Analog Scale (VAS)). For the VAS, the score range is 0 to 100, with a higher scoring meaning higher satisfaction.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Blinding to Treatment Group at 6 Weeks6 weeksParticipant blinding to treatment group will be assessed. All participants will be asked if they believe that they have received the real treatment, with possible responses of Yes, No, or Don't Know. Then, for the active and sham treatment groups, the blinding index will be calculated, where the blinding index can range from -1 to 1. A score of 1 means that all participants have guessed correctly about group assignment, a score of -1 means that all participants have guessed incorrectly about group assignment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

18 participants signed the Informed Consent Form and screened. 12 Subjects were fully enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

Of 18 subjects that signed the Informed Consent, 6 did not meet all of the Inclusion/Exclusion criteria before randomization to a study arm. Therefore, only 12 subjects were fully enrolled and randomized into the trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Treatment
Participants will self-administer treatment with the Empower device at the active treatment anatomic location twice daily for six weeks. Treatment adherence will be assessed and participants will complete surveys to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability Empower active treatment. Empower Neuromodulation System: Peripheral nerve stimulation with the Empower device. The active and sham treatments only differ by the location of application on the body.
6
Sham Treatment
Participants will self-administer treatment with the Empower device at the sham treatment anatomic location twice daily for six weeks. Treatment adherence will be assessed and participants will complete surveys to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability Empower sham treatment. Empower Neuromodulation System: Peripheral nerve stimulation with the Empower device. The active and sham treatments only differ by the location of application on the body.
6
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous44 Years41 Years41 Years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 62 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 61 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Treatment Adherence

Feasibility as assessed via treatment adherence (treatment sessions administered as a percentage of total possible) for each participant

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentTreatment Adherence82 Percentage of Treatment SessionsStandard Deviation 19
Sham TreatmentTreatment Adherence72 Percentage of Treatment SessionsStandard Deviation 29
Primary

Usability

Acceptability as assessed via a usability assessment (System Usability Scale (SUS)). For the SUS, the score range is 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating the stimulation system's better usability. The survey includes 10 questions in which statements about the system are rated from Strongly disagree up to Strongly agree.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentUsability73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Sham TreatmentUsability77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Secondary

Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score From Baseline to 6weeks

Anxiety severity evaluation via clinician-administered Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score. For the HAM-A, the score range is 0 to 56, with a higher scoring meaning more severe anxiety.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Change in HAM-A score from Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentChange in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score From Baseline to 6weeks-6.0 ScoreStandard Deviation 9.4
Sham TreatmentChange in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score From Baseline to 6weeks-12.2 ScoreStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Score From Baseline to 6 Weeks

Anxiety severity evaluation via participant-reported Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) score from Baseline to 6 weeks. For the BAI, the score range is 0 to 63, with a higher scoring meaning more severe anxiety.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Change in BAI score from Baseline to 6 week visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentChange in Participant-reported Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Score From Baseline to 6 Weeks-2.8 ScoreStandard Deviation 9.4
Sham TreatmentChange in Participant-reported Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Score From Baseline to 6 Weeks-2 ScoreStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Effective Nerve Stimulation

The percentage of treatment sessions that provide effective nerve stimulation as assessed via participant-reported confirmation of tingling sensation

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentEffective Nerve Stimulation98 % of treatments that felt skin tinglingStandard Deviation 2
Sham TreatmentEffective Nerve Stimulation100 % of treatments that felt skin tinglingStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events

Safety assessment via device-related adverse events

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentNumber of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events0 Participants
Sham TreatmentNumber of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events1 Participants
Secondary

Satisfaction With Treatment

The overall satisfaction with treatment (via 100-mm Visual-Analog Scale (VAS)). For the VAS, the score range is 0 to 100, with a higher scoring meaning higher satisfaction.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentSatisfaction With Treatment52 VAS scoreStandard Deviation 25
Sham TreatmentSatisfaction With Treatment42 VAS scoreStandard Deviation 22
Other Pre-specified

Participant Blinding to Treatment Group at 6 Weeks

Participant blinding to treatment group will be assessed. All participants will be asked if they believe that they have received the real treatment, with possible responses of Yes, No, or Don't Know. Then, for the active and sham treatment groups, the blinding index will be calculated, where the blinding index can range from -1 to 1. A score of 1 means that all participants have guessed correctly about group assignment, a score of -1 means that all participants have guessed incorrectly about group assignment.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Blinding Index at 6 week visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active TreatmentParticipant Blinding to Treatment Group at 6 Weeks-0.4 Index
Sham TreatmentParticipant Blinding to Treatment Group at 6 Weeks-0.17 Index

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026