Skip to content

Comparison of Vibration and Dry Needle in Trigger Point Therapy

Comparison of Vibration Applied to the Trigger Point and Dry Needle in Acute Myofascial Pain Syndrome: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Research

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04900857
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-05-25
Start date
2020-12-07
Completion date
2021-02-25
Last updated
2021-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndrome, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial

Keywords

Myofascial Pain Syndrome, Trigger Point, Dry Needling, Vibration

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of localized vibration and dry needling applied to the trigger point in the individuals with acute myofascial pain syndrome.Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used for the primary outcome measure of the study, and pain intensity, pain tolerance and short form (SF-36) were used for secondary outcome measures.

Detailed description

The patients were divided into two groups as dry needling and localized vibration using the permuted block randomization method. The study was completed with 20 (17 women, 3 men) in the dry needling group and 20 in localized vibration (15 women, 5 men). In both applications, a total of 3 sessions were made to the patients at 1-day intervals.Patients' age, gender, duration of pain, localization, presence of additional disease, drug use were questioned and recorded. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was used for the primary outcome measure of the study, and pain intensity, pain tolerance and short form (SF-36) were used for secondary outcome measures. All evaluation criteria except SF-36 were made before, immediately after and 1 day after each session, 1 week after the last session. SF-36 was evaluated before the 1st session treatment, after the 3rd session treatment and 1 week after the 3rd session treatment.

Interventions

Local twitch responses (LTRs) were obtained by multiple rapid insertions of the needle in and out of the point, similar to Hong's rapid-entry and rapid exit technique. Hong 1994). The needle was not removed from that site for the maximum stimulation time of 1 minute to 3 minutes after a local twitch response was obtained.

DEVICELocalize vibration

the vibration was applied with 110 Hz and 5.57 mm amplitude.

Sponsors

Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least one active myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle * Symptoms lasting 1 day to 2 weeks * Cases who did not receive any physical therapy or medication to relieve pain

Exclusion criteria

* Sensory defect in the area to be treated with vibration * Active inflammatory, rheumatological or infectious disease * Peripheral nerve lesions such as polyneuropathy, radiculopathy * Having a cardiac disorder (rhythm / conduction disorder, cardiac pacemaker, ischemic heart disease) * Diagnosis of fibromyalgia or other common musculoskeletal pain syndromes with an intact skin surface in the area to be vibrated * Patients with a history of panic attacks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain thresholdChange from baseline pressure pain threshold score at immediately after, 1 day after and 1 week after the last sessionThe test determines the amount of pressure over a given area in which a steadily increasing nonpainful pressure stimulus turns into a painful pressure sensation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scaleChange from baseline VAS score at immediately after, 1 day after and 1 week after the last sessionA Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. The patients were asked to score between 0 and 10 for the severity of their pain. It was said that 0 on the scale means no pain, 10 means unbearable pain.
Pain toleranceChange from baseline Pain tolerance score at immediately after, 1 day after and 1 week after the last sessionUsing an algometer (WAGNER-FPK20), a pressure of 2.5 kg /cm2 will be applied to the trigger point and patients will be asked to measure their pain with VAS after pressure application. The severity of the pain felt by the patients after the application of pressure will be measured by VAS. The patients were asked to score between 0 and 10 for the severity of their pain. It was said that 0 on the scale means no pain, 10 means unbearable pain.
Short Form 36 (SF-36)Change from baseline Short Form 36 score at immediately after the 3rd session and 1 week after the treatmentThe scale consists of 36 items and these provide the measurement of 8 dimensions; physical function (10 items), social function (2 items), role limitations due to physical functions (4 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), mental health (5 items), energy / vitality (4 items), pain (2 items) and general perception of health (5 items).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026