Skip to content

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Randomised, Double-blind Cross-over Study Utilising Mixed Microbiota From Healthy Donors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04899869
Acronym
MISCEAT
Enrollment
61
Registered
2021-05-25
Start date
2021-06-17
Completion date
2024-04-29
Last updated
2024-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome Mixed, Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Keywords

IBS - D, IBS - M

Brief summary

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional bowel disorder, being present in approximately 10% of adult Europoid population. The etiology of IBS is elusive. Literature indicates that modification of patients´colonic microbiota might ameliorate the condition. Here we test an intervention by faecal microbiota transplantation of artificially inflated microbiome diversity, versus autoclaved placebo.

Detailed description

Three-groups, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, cross-over study in adult patients diagnosed with IBS (diarrhoeal or mixed form) according to Rome IV criteria. Each study subject will undergo two pairs of faecal microbiota transplantation (a total of four enemas for each patient), with the pairs of transfers being eight weeks apart. The active intervention substance is a mixed stool microbiota derived from healthy individuals, screened for infectious diseases according to European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation guidelines, and who were preselected for high alpha diversity of their microbiome and distance in community ordination from IBS patients microbiota. Placebo is the same mixture, inactivated by autoclaving.

Interventions

OTHERFaecal microbiota transplantation with active study microbiota first

2x enema with active study microbiota; after 8 wks 2x enema with inactive autoclaved study microbiota

OTHERFaecal microbiota transplantation with inactive autoclaved study microbiota first

2x enema with inactive autoclaved study microbiota; after 8 wks 2x enema with active study microbiota

OTHERFaecal microbiota transplantation with inactive autoclaved study microbiota only

2x enema with inactive autoclaved study microbiota; after 8 wks 2x enema with inactive autoclaved study microbiota

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
CollaboratorOTHER
Thomayer University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

double-blind

Intervention model description

Each study subject will undergo two pairs of faecal microbiota transplantation eight weeks apart (a total of four enemas for each patient). Our study design has several specific features: (a) Two consecutive transfers were designed to improve study microbiota engraftment. Before the first of every transfer pairs, the subjects will receive a reduced dose of oral polyethylene glycol for partial bowel preparation. (b) To help discern potential carry-over effects, a placebo-only group was included; this also enables us to assess long-term effects of the intervention. (c) The transferred microbiota is identical throughout the study, having been mixed beforehand, aliquoted and deep frozen. Its alpha diversity was artificially increased by mixing stools from several donors. (d) Placebo is made of the same mixture by careful autoclaving.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D) or Irritable Bowel Syndrome with mixed bowel habits (IBS-M) according to the Rome IV criteria

Exclusion criteria

* The use of antibiotics within one month prior to faecal microbiota transplantation * The use of probiotics within one month prior to faecal microbiota transplantation * History of inflammatory bowel disease or gastrointestinal malignancy, systemic autoimmune diseases (ongoing or in history) * Previous abdominal surgery (other than appendectomy or cholecystectomy or hernioplasty or cesarean section) * HIV infection or other active infection * Renal or hepatic disease (both defined by biochemistry workup) * Diabetes mellitus, abnormal thyroid functions not controlled by thyroid medications * Bipolar disorder or schizophrenia (ongoing or history thereof), moderately severe depression defined by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score \> 15 * Anxiety defined by a Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7) score \> 10 * Current pregnancy and lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the IBS severity symptom score (IBS-SSS)The difference between the score at four weeks after the intervention (study weeks 5 or 13, respectively) and the baseline score (week -1 in 'Active microbiota first' group or week 8 in 'Inactive microbiota first' group)Change in the IBS severity symptom score (IBS-SSS) in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The long-term change in the IBS severity symptom score (IBS-SSS)baseline and study week 32IBS-SSS between baseline (week -1) and week 32. The long term change will compare placebo group to merged active study microbiota groups.
Change in number of loose stools per daybaseline and study week 32Change in number of loose stools per day in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group
Change in stool consistencybaseline and study week 32Change in stool consistency evaluated by Bristol stool scale (type 3 and 4 - normal; types 1,2,5,6 and 7 - abnormal) in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group
Change in abdominal painbaseline and study week 32Change in abdominal pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0 - no pain, 10 - worst pain) in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group
Change in frequency of bloating per weekbaseline and study week 32Change in frequency of bloating per week (as there is no standardised measurement, it will be reported as number of episodes per time unit, where the possible answers could be: no bloating, bloating once a week, twice a week, three times a week, four times a week, five times a week, six times a week, bloating daily, bloating daily and sometimes at night, bloating more than half of days, bloating continuously) in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group
Change in Body Mass Indexbaseline and study week 32Change in Body Mass Index (BMI in kg/m\^2) in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group
The acute change in the IBS severity symptom score (IBS-SSS)study weeks 3 and 11, respectivelyIBS-SSS between baseline and two weeks after intervention
Change in body fat mass estimated by skinfold thickness measuringbaseline and study week 32Change in body fat mass estimated by measuring combined skinfold thickness at given locations (biceps, triceps, subscapular, suprailiac) in millimetres in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group
Change in body fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysisbaseline and study week 32Change in body fat mass in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (in %)
Change in faecal microbiome's alpha (within-sample) diversitybaseline and study week 32Change in faecal microbiome's alpha (within-sample) diversity in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group measured by Chao index of alpha diversity (higher value means higher alpha-diversity)
Change in faecal microbiome's beta (between samples) diversitybaseline and study week 32Change in faecal microbiome's beta (between samples) diversity in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group assessed by the quantitative Bray-Curtis index (more distant means more different bacterial composition) ordinated by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS)
Change in the quantity of single-cell protist Blastocystisbaseline and study week 32Change in the quantity of single-cell protist Blastocystis in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group assessed by a specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay measured in genomic equivalents per microlitre DNA (the higher concentration means more of Blastocystis)
The psychological and well-being effects of the therapy (IBS-QoL)baseline and study week 32The psychological and well-being effects of the therapy scored by IBS-QoL questionnaires
Change in waist circumferencebaseline and study week 32Change in waist circumference (in centimeters) in the active microbiota group relative to the placebo group

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026