Skip to content

Comparing the Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives and Conventional Sutures

Comparing the Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives and Conventional Sutures in the Closure of Intraoral Surgical Wounds- A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04898816
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-05-24
Start date
2020-03-30
Completion date
2021-04-25
Last updated
2023-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Heal

Brief summary

This study compares the effectiveness of two materials used for intraoral wound closure after removal of impacted mandibular third molar tooth. One Group received braided black silk suture and the other group received N-butyl 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives.

Detailed description

Conventional method of wound closure after removal of impacted mandibular molar is by suturing the wound using braided black silk suture and allowing for primary healing. Suturing in the most posterior region of oral cavity is not easy, it requires more time and additional skills as well. Patient has to come for a second visit for removal of suture. Moreover tight sutures may lead to ischemia and necrosis. Tissue adhesives adopts the idea of sutureless wound closure. They are even sloughed off from the surface of mucosa 7 days after the application. This study compares the effectiveness of conventional sutures and tissue adhesives in closure of intraoral surgical wounds after removal of mandibular third molar.

Interventions

PROCEDUREclosure of wound using n- butyl 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive

Application of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives over the surgical wound

PROCEDUREclosure of wound using braided silk suture

suturing the surgical wound using braided black silk

Sponsors

Melaka Manipal Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients requiring surgical removal of mesioangular, position A impacted mandibular third molar * clean incisions approximately 2-3 cms in length which can be approximated * Healthy (ASAI) or patients with mild systemic disease no functional limitations * Patients not allergic to the drugs or anesthetic agents used in the surgical protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Patients taking any medications that influences wound healing * Patients on non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs * smokers * uncooperative patients patients allergic to cyanoacrylate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain1st postoperative dayA 10 mm Numerical rating scale assessing postoperative pain. Possible score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
postoperative pain2nd postoperative dayA 10 mm Numerical rating scale assessing postoperative pain. Possible score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
wound healing7th postoperative dayA 5 point early wound healing scale assessing wound healing after 7 postoperative days.

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026