Healthy
Conditions
Keywords
High Fidelity Simulation, Simulation Training/methods, Task Performance and Analysis
Brief summary
Simulation in medicine is a powerful and effective teaching tool that has become essential for the training of students and health professionals. In this context, simulation instructor training have been implemented in recent years, where many subjects are addressed, such as the main principles of pedagogy, the integration of simulation, the construction of a scenario, briefing and debriefing. However, scenario facilitation, in particular the role of the embedded participant (EP), is only vaguely discussed. The EP of a high-fidelity simulation session plays a very important role in driving the scenario. Indeed, he/she guides the learner in order to achieve all the educational objectives set by the main instructor of the scenario. He/she also manages unexpected behavior and possible technical issues that may arise. Finally, the EP supervises the physical and psychological risks inherent in the simulation in order to maintain a safe environment. All of these key roles suggest that the EP can influence the performance of the learners. Little is known about the relationship between Facilitation and Learner Performance. In this observational study, investigators aim to explore the influence of the embedded participant on learners' technical and non-technical performances during high-fidelity simulation by analysing previously recorded sessions.
Detailed description
In this observational study, investigators aim to measure performance on high-fidelity simulation scenarios (HFS) used routinely in the current anesthesiology, training curriculum. Age, sex, previous experience of HFS will be noted. All data will be anonymized. Two investigators will independently evaluate the performance of HFS by video record: * technical performance on tables pre-established by experienced instructors and based on international recommendations, * non-technical performances, assessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Claude Bernard University
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion criteria
* Resident physicians in anesthesia/intensive care- postgraduate year 1-5 participating in HFS training sessions from 2015 to 2021 * Consent for recording
Exclusion criteria
* Denial to be recorded
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Skills Performance | 1 month (review video) | technical performance on a scale pre-established according to each scenario rated from 0 to 100. |
| Non-technical skills performance | 1 month (review video) | Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale rated from 6 to 42. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Demographic characteristics | 1 month (collect data) | demographic data related to the instructors (embedded participants) through a questionary |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed