Skip to content

Exploration of Possible Reasons for the Discrepancy Between Expectation and Indication of Subjective Perceived Exertions

Exploration of Possible Reasons for the Discrepancy Between Expectation and Indication of Subjective Perceived Exertions of Patients Over 55 Years of Age With Coronary Heart Disease in 6-min Walking Test in Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04898296
Acronym
Ex-6-rate
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-05-24
Start date
2021-07-01
Completion date
2022-08-14
Last updated
2022-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Rehabilitation, Coronary Disease, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Physical Therapy

Brief summary

The 6-minute walk test is a test of physical performance in physiotherapy with lungs and heart patients (Pollentier 2010). However, only 8 and 11% of patients in everyday test situations report a score of 7 or higher on a scale of 0-10 for effort (Jehn 2009). This study is intended to explore, based on grounded theory, why the majority of patients do not assess themselves according to the almost maximum performance.

Interventions

During the stay, a study visit is arranged with the patient after the 6-minute walk test has been performed. This consists of filling out the questionnaire and an interview, which lasts about 45-60 minutes. This is carried out by the investigator on at least 5 subjects. After each interview, a list of influencing factors is kept. If new aspects continue to appear in the 5th interview, the interviews are continued (up to a maximum of the 10th subject). If no new aspects appear in the interviews from number 6 onwards, the interviews are discontinued and no further patients are recruited. The conversations are recorded with an audio recording.

OTHERFocus Group

The focus group is carried out first in order to identify influencing variables that may be relevant for the interview (duration 60-90 minutes).

Sponsors

Klinik Barmelweid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing in-patient cardiovascular rehabilitation; over 55 years of age. Patients underwent a 6-minute walk test with assessment of the intensity of the exercise

Exclusion criteria

* no understanding of the German language * Patients would not be able to perform a 6-minute walk test, e. g. surgery on the large joints of the lower extremities, unstable heart disease or predominant neurological symptoms.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
semi-structured interview about reasons, that could influence the rating of patientsduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksPatients were asked in a semi-structured interview about other reasons, that could influence their rating.
reasons, what might patients influence for ratings of patients given from physical therapistwith the beginning of the study within 4 weeks, before the patients' questionnaire and interviewphysical therapists identify reasons in a focus group, that influence the patients.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' exertion and performance limitduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksopen questions
Patients' safety during the six-minute-walking testduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksnumeric rating scale 0-10 (more likely no = 0; more likely yes = 10)
Patients' experience with the conduction of the six-minute-walking testduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksnominal scale (yes-partly-no)
Patients' sportinessduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksnumeric rating scale 0-10 (more likely no = 0; more likely yes = 10)
Experience of maximal exertion of activity in the pastduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeks4-point nominal scale (weekly to several years ago)
Patients' performance limit before and after the heart diseaseduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksnumeric rating scale 0-10 (more likely no = 0; more likely yes = 10)
Patients' honesty of the statement of effortduring inpatient rehabilitation after the 1st six-minute-walking test within 3 weeksnominal scale (yes-no)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026