Skip to content

Comparison of the GTR Procedure Alone and in Combination With Immediate OTM

Comparison of the Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) Procedure Alone and in Combination With Immediate Orthodontic Tooth Movement (OTM) in the Treatment of Non-containing and Wide Intrabony Periodontal Defects: a Prospective RCT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04896450
Enrollment
36
Registered
2021-05-21
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intrabony Periodontal Defect

Keywords

guided tissue regeneration, orthodontic tooth movement, histology, bone remodeling, deproteinized bovine bone mineral

Brief summary

The aim is to evaluate in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study the healing of a GTR procedure, when it is combined with an immediate orthodontic tooth movement or used alone. Clinical, radiological and reentry (histological) evaluation of a regenerative surgical method (GTR + grafting material) with different postsurgical healing patterns in the treatment of wide, non-containing intrabony defects.

Detailed description

There is limited histological data in literature on the behavior of xenogeneic graft materials in intrabony defects used in periodontal regenerative therapy followed by orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). This clinical study aims to clinically and histologically evaluate the healing response of the periodontal tissues and the healing pattern of a non-resorbable graft material, when they are exposed to orthodontic forces. Therefore teeth presenting non-contained intrabony defects in combination with pathologic tooth migration (PTM) are included in this prospective clinical study. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with the application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and a resorbable collagen membrane is utilized to surgically treat the periodontal defects, which is followed by a random allocation of the patients into test or control group. Subject teeth undergo an early initiated orthodontic treatment after surgery or stay splinted without any tooth movement in the latter groups, respectively. Teeth in test group can be further divided into subgroups, depending if they are moved toward to the former defect (pressure site) or moved away from the defect (tension site). After 9 months of healing a reentry surgery is performed, when a biopsy core is removed with a microtrephine from the previous defect site. The sample is evaluated by means of histology supplemented with histomorphometry, which is the primary outcome variable. Periodontal clinical parameters measured at baseline and at 9 months serves for secondary outcomes. Several studies confirmed the success of graft materials in such comprehensive treatment approaches clinically, but we lack the human histologically proved data, whether DBBM bone substitute can be used safely when the tooth is exposed to OTM. Our main question is how orthodontic induced bone remodelling interferes with these graft particles, can they heal the same or even better compared to control sites. Tissue response might be different also in the case of the two test subgroups.

Interventions

GTR is handled with the utilization of a coronally advanced flap, followed by a thorough debridement of the denudated root surface and the intrabony component. Regenerative materials are resorbable collagen membrane (BioGide, Geistlich Phara AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (BioOss, Geistlich Phara AG), finally surgery is finished with multilayer suturing technique.

DEVICEOrthodontic tooth movement (OTM)

An early initialization of the tooth movement with the help of a multibond fixed orthodontic device utilizing low level of continuous orthodontic forces.

Sponsors

Schupbach Ltd.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Geistlich Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Semmelweis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The histologist is blinded to the study protocol

Intervention model description

Patients undergo GTR procedure, after they are randomly allocated either to test (with OTM) or control group (without OTM)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Periodontitis with intrabony defect (Intrabony component ≥ 4mm, defect radiological angulation \> 25°, 1 or max. 2 bony walls (no buccal bony wall), non-containing defect), no class III. furcation involved teeth * Selected tooth must be in a traumatic occlusion or not in a gnathologically correct bite (migrated, elongated, tilted tooth, etc.). * Patients must not be heavy smokers (\<5 cigarettes/day). * Full mouth plaque and bleeding scores (FMPS and FMBS) of \<20% (O'Leary et al. 1972). * The patient is able to comply with the study -related procedures (i.e. good level of oral hygiene, follow-up procedures). * The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the study, signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women. * Participation in another clinical study within 30 days prior to study start. * Alcoholism, drug dependency, heavy smoking (\>5 cigarettes/day). * Known infection with HIV, HBV, or HCV. * Patients requiring chemo- or radiotherapy. * Previous or current radiotherapy of the head. * Uncontrolled or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus * Clinically relevant osteoporosis or systemic disease affecting bone metabolism * Clinically relevant cardiovascular disease e.g., decompensated cardiac insufficiency, hemodynamically relevant heart valve defects, or myocardial infarction during the last three months. * Clinically relevant blood coagulation disorder. * Previous or current treatment with systemic corticosteroids (within 2 months prior to screening visit) of more than 5 mg/day prednisone equivalent. * Previous or current therapy with bisphosphonates at least for 30 days within the last 12 months before screening visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amount of newly formed bone by means of histomorphometry9 months postoperativelyThe percentage of newly formed bone of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Amount of graft material by means of histomorphometry9 months postoperativelyThe percentage of graft material (BioOss, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen) of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Amount of connective tissue by means of histomorphometry9 months postoperativelyThe percentage of connective tissue of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CAL9 months postoperativelyClinical attachment level gain
PPD9 months postoperativelyPocket probing depth reduction
GR9 months postoperativelyChange in gingival recession
Bone gain9 months postoperativelyThe absolute fill of the periodontal defect
Bone loss9 months postoperativelyThe change of the crestal bony wall
Intrabony fill9 months postoperativelyThe change of the intrabony component compared to the initial intrabony defect depth (in percentage)

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026