Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Mechanism of Action of Ruxolitinib Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo (TRuE-V MOA)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Mechanism of Action of Ruxolitinib Cream for Vitiligo

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04896385
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-05-21
Start date
2021-06-23
Completion date
2023-07-10
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitiligo

Keywords

Vitiligo, depigmenting disorder, topical JAK inhibitor

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the Mechanism Of Action (MOA) of ruxolitinib cream in vitiligo by assessing the change in biomarkers.

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib cream

Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.

DRUGVehicle Cream

Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.

Sponsors

Incyte Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, with an open-label treatment extension.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A clinical diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo with depigmented areas including ≥ 0.5% BSA on the face, ≥ 0.5 F-VASI, ≥ 3% BSA on nonfacial areas, and ≥ 3 T-VASI; total body vitiligo area (facial and nonfacial) should not exceed 50% BSA. * At least 1 active vitiligo lesion (eg, such as confetti lesion, trichrome appearance, pinkish rim, or other evidence of inflammatory activity) at the site for skin biopsy. * Agree to discontinue all agents used to treat vitiligo from screening through the final safety follow-up visit. Over-the-counter preparations deemed acceptable by the investigator and camouflage makeups are permitted.

Exclusion criteria

* No pigmented hair within any of the vitiligo areas on the face. * Other forms of vitiligo (eg, segmental) or other differential diagnosis of vitiligo or other skin depigmentation disorders (eg, piebaldism, pityriasis alba, leprosy, postinflammatory hypopigmentation, progressive macule hypomelanosis, nevus anemicus, chemical leukoderma, and tinea versicolor). * Used depigmentation treatments (eg, monobenzone) for past treatment of vitiligo or other pigmented areas except hydroquinone. * Any other skin disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study medication application or study assessments. * Conditions at baseline that would interfere with evaluation of vitiligo. * Use of any protocol-defined treatments within the indicated washout period before baseline.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Baseline; Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement obtained on or before the first application of study drug. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] / Baseline value)\*100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation of Key Skin Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vitiligo in Target Lesions to Efficacy ReadoutsBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24Clinical scores (facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index \[F-VASI\] and total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index \[T-VASI\]) were evaluated for correlation with skin CXCL10 levels.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Periodfrom the time of Informed Consent Form signing until the start of the Treatment-Extension Period or 30 days after the last application of study drug during the Double-Blind Period (up to Week 24 + 30 days)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Treatment-Extension Periodfrom the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug at Week 52 + 30 daysAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
Number of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Double-Blind Periodfrom the time of Informed Consent Form signing until the start of the Treatment-Extension Period or 30 days after the last application of study drug during the Double-Blind Period (up to Week 24 + 30 days)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. AE severity was assessed per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated; Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.
Number of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Treatment-Extension Periodfrom the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug at Week 52 + 30 daysAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. AE severity was assessed per the CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated; Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.

Countries

Canada, France, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study was conducted at a total of 11 sites in Canada, France, and the United States.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Participants applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
41
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BID
Participants applied matching vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks.
19
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
24-Week Double-Blind PeriodLost to Follow-up2300
24-Week Double-Blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject2200
28-Week Treatment-Extension PeriodLost to Follow-up0052
28-Week Treatment-Extension PeriodParticipant Refused Safety Follow-up0032
28-Week Treatment-Extension PeriodPregnancy0010
28-Week Treatment-Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDouble-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDTotalDouble-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BID
Age, Continuous45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.73
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.77
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.16
Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an immune biomarker600.066 nanograms per Liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 959.3097
542.778 nanograms per Liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 804.0389
415.471 nanograms per Liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 177.4902
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants44 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
5 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
South Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
25 Participants38 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants26 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants34 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 550 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 557 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 550 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24

Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement obtained on or before the first application of study drug. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as the (\[post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\] / Baseline value)\*100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24

Population: Safety Population: all participants who applied at least 1 dose of study drug. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDPercentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Week 4-20.93 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.216
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDPercentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Week 12-18.33 percent changeStandard Deviation 40.035
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDPercentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Week 24-12.92 percent changeStandard Deviation 46.146
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDPercentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Week 48.13 percent changeStandard Deviation 52.491
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDPercentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Week 1221.13 percent changeStandard Deviation 70.69
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDPercentage Change From Baseline in Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 10 (CXCL10), an Immune Biomarker, at Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24Week 2422.17 percent changeStandard Deviation 68.893
Secondary

Correlation of Key Skin Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vitiligo in Target Lesions to Efficacy Readouts

Clinical scores (facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index \[F-VASI\] and total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index \[T-VASI\]) were evaluated for correlation with skin CXCL10 levels.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

Population: Safety Population. Repeated measures correlation (Crm) takes into account that measures were taken from the same individual across multiple timepoints. Included in the analysis were only those participants with values at each of 3 timepoints: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDCorrelation of Key Skin Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vitiligo in Target Lesions to Efficacy ReadoutsF-VASI-0.34 correlation coefficient
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDCorrelation of Key Skin Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vitiligo in Target Lesions to Efficacy ReadoutsT-VASI-0.43 correlation coefficient
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDCorrelation of Key Skin Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vitiligo in Target Lesions to Efficacy ReadoutsF-VASI0.15 correlation coefficient
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDCorrelation of Key Skin Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vitiligo in Target Lesions to Efficacy ReadoutsT-VASI0.02 correlation coefficient
Comparison: F-VASIp-value: 0.004repeated measures correlation
Comparison: F-VASIp-value: 0.41repeated measures correlation
Comparison: T-VASIp-value: 0.0002repeated measures correlation
Comparison: T-VASIp-value: 0.91repeated measures correlation
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Double-Blind Period

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. AE severity was assessed per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated; Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.

Time frame: from the time of Informed Consent Form signing until the start of the Treatment-Extension Period or 30 days after the last application of study drug during the Double-Blind Period (up to Week 24 + 30 days)

Population: Double-Blind Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were determined according to the actual treatment the participant applied on Day 1.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDNumber of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Double-Blind Period1 Participants
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDNumber of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Double-Blind Period0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Treatment-Extension Period

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. AE severity was assessed per the CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated; Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.

Time frame: from the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug at Week 52 + 30 days

Population: Treatment-Extension Evaluable Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDNumber of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Treatment-Extension Period0 Participants
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDNumber of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher TEAE During the Treatment-Extension Period1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Treatment-Extension Period

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

Time frame: from the completion of the Week 24 assessments until at least 30 days after the last application of study drug at Week 52 + 30 days

Population: Treatment-Extension Evaluable Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib cream at least once during the Treatment-Extension Period

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Treatment-Extension Period12 Participants
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Treatment-Extension Period3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

Time frame: from the time of Informed Consent Form signing until the start of the Treatment-Extension Period or 30 days after the last application of study drug during the Double-Blind Period (up to Week 24 + 30 days)

Population: Double-Blind Safety Population: all participants who applied ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream at least once during the Double-Blind Period. Treatment groups for this population were determined according to the actual treatment the participant applied on Day 1.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Double-Blind Period: Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period19 Participants
Double-Blind Period: Vehicle Cream BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026