Skip to content

Acceptability in Dialogues With the Robot EBO

Acceptability in Dialogues Between the Robot EBO and Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04896333
Enrollment
6
Registered
2021-05-21
Start date
2021-06-15
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2022-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nervous System Diseases

Keywords

Nervous System Diseases, acceptability, Robot

Brief summary

This is a descriptive observational study (first results cross-sectional study, second results longitudinal study). The participants of the study will be exposed to a dialogue with the robot EBO. The user and the therapist's acceptability of the robot, the robot-user interaction during the conversation and the conversation parameters will be assessed.

Detailed description

This is a descriptive observational study (first results cross-sectional study, second results longitudinal study). The participants of the study will be exposed to a dialogue with the robot EBO. The user and the therapist's acceptability of the robot will be measure. Also the robot-user interaction during the conversation and the conversation parameters will be assessed. The assessements will be done at week 0 and at week 3. During weeks 1 and 2 the robot will be present in the therapeutic activities of the center.

Interventions

OTHERInteraction and exposure with the Robot EBO

The participants will interact with the Robot EBO. The robot will be control by an operator that will conduct a dialogue. The dialogue will include questions related to the social, leisure, activities of daily living and informative areas.

Sponsors

University of Extremadura
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Users of socio-health centers in Extremadura (Spain). * Patients with neurological pathology diagnosed by a specialist doctor. * Over 65 years of age * Minimental State Examination with a score greater than or equal to 21 (mild-moderate cognitive impairment).

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive impairment * Language impairment that prevents the use of verbal communication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Robot-user interaction during the conversation: Conversation topic that most motivates the user or with which the user most interacts with the robot measured by recording and viewing the conversationMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionRobot-user interaction during the conversation measured by recording and viewing the conversation
Robot-user interaction during the conversation: attempts to touch the robot by the patient measured by recording and viewing the conversationMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionRobot-user interaction during the conversation measured by recording and viewing the conversation
Robot-user interaction during the conversation: times the user asks the robot questions measured by recording and viewing the conversationMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionRobot-user interaction during the conversation measured by recording and viewing the conversation.
Robot-user interaction during the conversation: emotions that the conversation provokes in the patient measured by recording and viewing the conversationMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionRobot-user interaction during the conversation measured by recording and viewing the conversation: emotions that the conversation provokes in the user (Standard, happy, sad, angry)
Robot-user interaction during the conversation: number of total interactions measured by recording and viewing the conversationMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionRobot-user interaction during the conversation measured by recording and viewing the conversation.
Conversation parameters: time of the dialogue measured by the robot's registerMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionConversation parameters measured by the robot's register
Conversation parameters: speed of response measured by the robot's registerMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionConversation parameters (measured by the robot's register): speed of response (time taken by the patient to respond)
Conversation parameters: eye contact and patient's attention measured by the robot's registerMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionConversation parameters (measured by the robot's register): eye contact with the robot and the attention of the patient to follow the conversation.
Conversation parameters: repetition of questions measured by the robot's registerMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionConversation parameters (measured by the robot's register): number of times the patient needed to be asked a question again.
User acceptability of the robot with the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaireMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionUser acceptability of the robot measured with the Technology Acceptance Model. This scale has good validity and reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha value above 0.8 (Alenazy, Mugahed Al-Rahmi, & Khan, 2019). It assesses the following dimensions relating to the technology product: * Perceived ease of use: the extent to which users believe that using a particular system would improve their performance. * Perceived usefulness: the extent to which the individual believes that using the system will be effortless * Attitude towards use * Relevance A higher scores indicates a higher acceptability.
User acceptability of the robot measures with an specific designed questionnaireMeasured at the exposure/dialogue of the patient with the robot EBO during the interventionUser acceptability of the robot measured with a questionnaire designed by the authors of the study. The questionnaire has 10 items that evaluate the acceptability of the robot by the user. This 10 questions have 3 choice answer with the options being yes, no, I don not know. There is one open question to collect qualitative data a¡regarding the dialogue and the acceptability.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026