Vocabulary Acquisition
Conditions
Keywords
Dual language technology, scientific academic vocabulary
Brief summary
The study will evaluate Talk STEM Familia (TSF) effects on student and parent scientific academic vocabulary knowledge and usage, scientific academic vocabulary (SAV) learning behaviors, academic self efficacy, and satisfaction with the program, including acceptance of the technology and its usability.
Detailed description
The Investigators will work with research practice partners Lane Educational Services District (ESD) to disseminate bilingual electronic and printed recruitment materials to Latinx families in the elementary and middle schools throughout the 16 school districts in Lane County, OR. Recruitment materials will direct families to contact the project's bilingual staff by phone to receive study details and, following a brief screen, to engage in an informed consent process. 300 eligible Latinx English-learner parent/student dyads will be recruited. Students will be in grade 4-8; families will speak primarily Spanish in the home; and families will have a smartphone, tablet, or computer and Internet access at home. The Investigators will administer the pre-test to all 300 parent/student dyads via Qualtrics and randomize 150 parent/student dyads to the TSF treatment, 150 parent/student dyads to the treatment-as-usual control condition. Each family will be assigned a non-identifiable user name linked only to their non-identifiable participant ID. The Investigators will then send the TSF program materials and links to the treatment group. These materials will include graphic and video tutorials on TSF set-up and use, including set-up of a wireless bridge that allows researchers to monitor the non-identifiable program usage. Bilingual telephone support will be provided during the 1-month set-up period and throughout the 24-week TSF intervention period. During the intervention, families in the treatment group will be asked to use TSF for 24 weeks. During that time, they will receive 3 notifications/week that prompt them to engage in program games and activities targeting 72 scientific academic vocabulary (SAV) words. Half way through the 24-week intervention period, the Investigators will administer the mid-test via Qualtrics to all 300 parent/student dyads and following the 24-week intervention, the Investigators will administer the post-test via Qualtrics to all 300 parent/student dyads. Pre-, mid-, and post-test surveys will measure gains in knowledge and usage of the 72 SAV words TSF targets, academic self-efficacy, and academic enabling behaviors. Treatment group dyads will also complete a usability, technology acceptance, and consumer satisfaction survey at post-test. All 300 parent/student dyads will receive a smart speaker at pretest, and $100 at mid-test and post-test. Following post-test, parent/student dyads in the treatment-as-usual control condition will receive TSF program materials.
Interventions
This study has one intervention and two arms: experimental and treatment as usual. Participants randomized to the treatment condition will receive the TSF technology in addition to the vocabulary instruction, monitoring, or resources delivered by English Language Development programs (ELD) and schools. TSF will deliver frequent, brief, dual-language exercises to help families learn, practice and apply SAV words in conversation. Audio-visual lessons will support learning at all literacy levels, regardless of prior familiarity with STEM subjects. The complete TSF tool will contain approximately 72 minutes of video modeling and 12 hours of interactive exercises delivered over 24-weeks in brief, interactive, easy to assimilate lessons.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
One intervention and two arms: Intervention and treatment-as-usual
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Latinx English learner parent with a student (grade 4-8) 2. Speaking primarily Spanish in the home 3. Having a smartphone, tablet, or computer 4. Having Internet in the home 5. Being the student (grade 4-8) of a participating parent
Exclusion criteria
1\. N/A
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in student vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge. |
| Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in parent vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge. |
| Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in student ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence. |
| Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in parent ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | STEM will measure student interest in choosing STEM careers (4 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) and the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all interested, 5 = extremely interested) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .69) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater interest using SAV words. |
| Student Use of SAV: AVUB | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in student use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words. |
| Student Academic Learning (ALB) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | ALB will measure student academic learning behaviors (20 items). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .90) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater levels of perceived academic learning behaviors. |
| Parent Academic Support (AEB) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AEB will measure parent academic support behaviors (20 items). Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 9-point response option (1 = nothing, 9 = a great deal) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .94) and could range from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicated greater efficacy to influence school performance. |
| Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in parent use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .91) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words. |
| Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVC will measure student confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words. |
| Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment) | AVC will measure parent confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .95) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
We enrolled 400 participants, however, only 168 parents and student dyads (N = 336) were randomized to the study. The remaining 64 participants were part of the formative research and were never meant to be part of the randomized study. In the Protocol Enrollment, the Number Started and Number Completed reflect dyads. See the Milestones for specificity at the parent and youth levels.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention Parent/student/dyads in the treatment condition will be sent program materials via mail and text or email, including smart-speaker hardware, wireless network bridges for wireless network connectivity, and web links to Talk STEM Familia, including set-up video tutorials, and graphic instructions. Intervention activities will take place in participants' homes over the 24-week intervention period and will include using the dual-language Talk STEM Familia technology to receive instruction, practice, and feedback on academic vocabulary.
Talk STEM Familia Treatment Condition: This study has one intervention and two arms: experimental and treatment as usual. Participants randomized to the treatment condition will receive the TSF technology in addition to the vocabulary instruction, monitoring, or resources delivered by English Language Development programs (ELD) and schools. TSF will deliver frequent, brief, dual-language exercises to help families learn, practice and apply SAV words in conversation. Audio-visual lessons will support learning at all literacy levels, regardless of prior familiarity with STEM subjects. The complete TSF tool will contain approximately 72 minutes of video modeling and 12 hours of interactive exercises delivered over 24-weeks in brief, interactive, easy to assimilate lessons. | 164 |
| Treatment as Usual Parent/student dyads in this arm will receive treatment-as-usual (the vocabulary instruction regularly provided in their schools). They will receive the TSF technology after post-test data has been collected. | 172 |
| Total | 336 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 113 | 113 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Experimental: Intervention | Total | Treatment as Usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 82 Participants | 168 Participants | 86 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 81 Participants | 167 Participants | 86 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 114 Participants | 225 Participants | 111 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 25 Participants | 38 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 21 Participants | 63 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Relationship to Child NA for child or missing parent report | 80 Participants | 172 Participants | 92 Participants |
| Relationship to Child Parent report - Daughter | 45 Participants | 90 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Relationship to Child Parent report - Other | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Relationship to Child Parent report - Son | 38 Participants | 73 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 115 Participants | 246 Participants | 131 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 49 Participants | 90 Participants | 41 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 164 | 0 / 172 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 164 | 0 / 172 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 164 | 0 / 172 |
Outcome results
Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)
AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in parent vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | T1 | 72.27 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 13.2 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | T2 | 75.49 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | T3 | 76.90 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | T1 | 72.53 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 11.78 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | T2 | 73.20 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 14.93 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM) | T3 | 76.30 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 11.46 |
Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)
AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in parent ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T1 | 80.84 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 11.19 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T2 | 82.38 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 8.59 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T3 | 82.41 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 10.43 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T1 | 80.59 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 10.34 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T2 | 79.98 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 12.33 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T3 | 79.90 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 9.42 |
Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU)
AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in student ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T1 | 71.04 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 14.31 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T2 | 74.27 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 15.94 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T3 | 76.50 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 12.11 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T1 | 72.05 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 12.44 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T2 | 72.94 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU) | T3 | 70.93 percentage of words used correctly | Standard Deviation 17.76 |
Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)
AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in student vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | T1 | 60.63 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 17.42 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | T2 | 65.82 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 19.34 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | T3 | 69.79 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 17.21 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | T1 | 62.43 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 18.27 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | T2 | 67.35 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 15.97 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM) | T3 | 61.80 percentage of vocabulary words correct | Standard Deviation 23.37 |
Parent Academic Support (AEB)
AEB will measure parent academic support behaviors (20 items). Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 9-point response option (1 = nothing, 9 = a great deal) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .94) and could range from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicated greater efficacy to influence school performance.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Academic Support (AEB) | T1 | 7.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Academic Support (AEB) | T2 | 7.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.37 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Academic Support (AEB) | T3 | 7.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Academic Support (AEB) | T1 | 7.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Academic Support (AEB) | T2 | 7.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.33 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Academic Support (AEB) | T3 | 7.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.37 |
Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)
AVC will measure parent confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .95) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T1 | 2.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T2 | 2.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T3 | 2.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T1 | 2.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T2 | 2.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T3 | 2.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
Parent Use of SAV: AVUB
AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in parent use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .91) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | T1 | 1.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | T2 | 2.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | T3 | 2.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | T1 | 1.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | T2 | 2.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Treatment as Usual | Parent Use of SAV: AVUB | T3 | 2.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
Student Academic Learning (ALB)
ALB will measure student academic learning behaviors (20 items). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .90) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater levels of perceived academic learning behaviors.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Academic Learning (ALB) | T1 | 4.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Academic Learning (ALB) | T2 | 4.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Academic Learning (ALB) | T3 | 3.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Academic Learning (ALB) | T1 | 4.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Academic Learning (ALB) | T2 | 4.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Academic Learning (ALB) | T3 | 4.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)
AVC will measure student confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T1 | 2.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T2 | 2.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T3 | 3.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T1 | 2.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T2 | 2.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC) | T3 | 3.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)
STEM will measure student interest in choosing STEM careers (4 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) and the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all interested, 5 = extremely interested) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .69) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater interest using SAV words.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | T1 | 3.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | T2 | 3.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | T3 | 2.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | T1 | 3.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | T2 | 2.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM) | T3 | 3.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
Student Use of SAV: AVUB
AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in student use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Use of SAV: AVUB | T1 | 2.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Use of SAV: AVUB | T2 | 2.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Experimental: Intervention | Student Use of SAV: AVUB | T3 | 2.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Use of SAV: AVUB | T1 | 2.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Use of SAV: AVUB | T2 | 2.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Treatment as Usual | Student Use of SAV: AVUB | T3 | 2.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |