Skip to content

Talk STEM Familia: Dual-Language (TSFII)

Talk STEM Familia: Dual-Language Academic Vocabulary-Building Technology to Improve Educational, Career, and Health Outcomes Among Latinx Students

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04896229
Acronym
TSFII
Enrollment
400
Registered
2021-05-21
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2024-09-12
Last updated
2025-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vocabulary Acquisition

Keywords

Dual language technology, scientific academic vocabulary

Brief summary

The study will evaluate Talk STEM Familia (TSF) effects on student and parent scientific academic vocabulary knowledge and usage, scientific academic vocabulary (SAV) learning behaviors, academic self efficacy, and satisfaction with the program, including acceptance of the technology and its usability.

Detailed description

The Investigators will work with research practice partners Lane Educational Services District (ESD) to disseminate bilingual electronic and printed recruitment materials to Latinx families in the elementary and middle schools throughout the 16 school districts in Lane County, OR. Recruitment materials will direct families to contact the project's bilingual staff by phone to receive study details and, following a brief screen, to engage in an informed consent process. 300 eligible Latinx English-learner parent/student dyads will be recruited. Students will be in grade 4-8; families will speak primarily Spanish in the home; and families will have a smartphone, tablet, or computer and Internet access at home. The Investigators will administer the pre-test to all 300 parent/student dyads via Qualtrics and randomize 150 parent/student dyads to the TSF treatment, 150 parent/student dyads to the treatment-as-usual control condition. Each family will be assigned a non-identifiable user name linked only to their non-identifiable participant ID. The Investigators will then send the TSF program materials and links to the treatment group. These materials will include graphic and video tutorials on TSF set-up and use, including set-up of a wireless bridge that allows researchers to monitor the non-identifiable program usage. Bilingual telephone support will be provided during the 1-month set-up period and throughout the 24-week TSF intervention period. During the intervention, families in the treatment group will be asked to use TSF for 24 weeks. During that time, they will receive 3 notifications/week that prompt them to engage in program games and activities targeting 72 scientific academic vocabulary (SAV) words. Half way through the 24-week intervention period, the Investigators will administer the mid-test via Qualtrics to all 300 parent/student dyads and following the 24-week intervention, the Investigators will administer the post-test via Qualtrics to all 300 parent/student dyads. Pre-, mid-, and post-test surveys will measure gains in knowledge and usage of the 72 SAV words TSF targets, academic self-efficacy, and academic enabling behaviors. Treatment group dyads will also complete a usability, technology acceptance, and consumer satisfaction survey at post-test. All 300 parent/student dyads will receive a smart speaker at pretest, and $100 at mid-test and post-test. Following post-test, parent/student dyads in the treatment-as-usual control condition will receive TSF program materials.

Interventions

OTHERTalk STEM Familia Treatment Condition

This study has one intervention and two arms: experimental and treatment as usual. Participants randomized to the treatment condition will receive the TSF technology in addition to the vocabulary instruction, monitoring, or resources delivered by English Language Development programs (ELD) and schools. TSF will deliver frequent, brief, dual-language exercises to help families learn, practice and apply SAV words in conversation. Audio-visual lessons will support learning at all literacy levels, regardless of prior familiarity with STEM subjects. The complete TSF tool will contain approximately 72 minutes of video modeling and 12 hours of interactive exercises delivered over 24-weeks in brief, interactive, easy to assimilate lessons.

Sponsors

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

One intervention and two arms: Intervention and treatment-as-usual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Latinx English learner parent with a student (grade 4-8) 2. Speaking primarily Spanish in the home 3. Having a smartphone, tablet, or computer 4. Having Internet in the home 5. Being the student (grade 4-8) of a participating parent

Exclusion criteria

1\. N/A

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in student vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.
Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in parent vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.
Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in student ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.
Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in parent ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)STEM will measure student interest in choosing STEM careers (4 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) and the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all interested, 5 = extremely interested) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .69) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater interest using SAV words.
Student Use of SAV: AVUBBaseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in student use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.
Student Academic Learning (ALB)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)ALB will measure student academic learning behaviors (20 items). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .90) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater levels of perceived academic learning behaviors.
Parent Academic Support (AEB)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AEB will measure parent academic support behaviors (20 items). Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 9-point response option (1 = nothing, 9 = a great deal) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .94) and could range from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicated greater efficacy to influence school performance.
Parent Use of SAV: AVUBBaseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in parent use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .91) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.
Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVC will measure student confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.
Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)AVC will measure parent confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .95) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

We enrolled 400 participants, however, only 168 parents and student dyads (N = 336) were randomized to the study. The remaining 64 participants were part of the formative research and were never meant to be part of the randomized study. In the Protocol Enrollment, the Number Started and Number Completed reflect dyads. See the Milestones for specificity at the parent and youth levels.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental: Intervention
Parent/student/dyads in the treatment condition will be sent program materials via mail and text or email, including smart-speaker hardware, wireless network bridges for wireless network connectivity, and web links to Talk STEM Familia, including set-up video tutorials, and graphic instructions. Intervention activities will take place in participants' homes over the 24-week intervention period and will include using the dual-language Talk STEM Familia technology to receive instruction, practice, and feedback on academic vocabulary. Talk STEM Familia Treatment Condition: This study has one intervention and two arms: experimental and treatment as usual. Participants randomized to the treatment condition will receive the TSF technology in addition to the vocabulary instruction, monitoring, or resources delivered by English Language Development programs (ELD) and schools. TSF will deliver frequent, brief, dual-language exercises to help families learn, practice and apply SAV words in conversation. Audio-visual lessons will support learning at all literacy levels, regardless of prior familiarity with STEM subjects. The complete TSF tool will contain approximately 72 minutes of video modeling and 12 hours of interactive exercises delivered over 24-weeks in brief, interactive, easy to assimilate lessons.
164
Treatment as Usual
Parent/student dyads in this arm will receive treatment-as-usual (the vocabulary instruction regularly provided in their schools). They will receive the TSF technology after post-test data has been collected.
172
Total336

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up113113

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental: InterventionTotalTreatment as Usual
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
82 Participants168 Participants86 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
81 Participants167 Participants86 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
114 Participants225 Participants111 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
25 Participants38 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants63 Participants42 Participants
Relationship to Child
NA for child or missing parent report
80 Participants172 Participants92 Participants
Relationship to Child
Parent report - Daughter
45 Participants90 Participants45 Participants
Relationship to Child
Parent report - Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Relationship to Child
Parent report - Son
38 Participants73 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
115 Participants246 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants90 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1640 / 172
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1640 / 172
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1640 / 172

Outcome results

Primary

Parent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)

AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in parent vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionParent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)T172.27 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 13.2
Experimental: InterventionParent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)T275.49 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 14.9
Experimental: InterventionParent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)T376.90 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 15.2
Treatment as UsualParent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)T172.53 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 11.78
Treatment as UsualParent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)T273.20 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 14.93
Treatment as UsualParent SAV Word Meaning (AVM)T376.30 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 11.46
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.8t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Parent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)

AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in parent ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionParent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T180.84 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 11.19
Experimental: InterventionParent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T282.38 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 8.59
Experimental: InterventionParent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T382.41 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 10.43
Treatment as UsualParent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T180.59 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 10.34
Treatment as UsualParent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T279.98 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 12.33
Treatment as UsualParent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T379.90 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 9.42
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.325t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Student SAV Word Usage (AVWU)

AVMU (Academic Vocabulary Meaning Usage) will measure change in student ability to correctly use vocabulary words in sentence contexts. The sentence verification test is similar to the Test of Instructed Word Knowledge in Vocabulary used in the Apthorp et al. (2012) study of vocabulary learning in middle school. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly used in sentence context out of 72 items. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary words used correctly in a sentence.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionStudent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T171.04 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 14.31
Experimental: InterventionStudent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T274.27 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 15.94
Experimental: InterventionStudent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T376.50 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 12.11
Treatment as UsualStudent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T172.05 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 12.44
Treatment as UsualStudent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T272.94 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 13.9
Treatment as UsualStudent SAV Word Usage (AVWU)T370.93 percentage of words used correctlyStandard Deviation 17.76
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.235t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Student Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)

AVM (Academic Vocabulary Meaning) will measure change in student vocabulary knowledge (multiple choice test of meaning). The multiple choice test is based on the assessment used in Beck et al. (1982) and McKeown et al. (1983) with middle school students. Scores were computed as the total percentage of vocabulary words correctly identified out of 72. Score could range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater levels of vocabulary knowledge.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionStudent Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)T160.63 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 17.42
Experimental: InterventionStudent Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)T265.82 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 19.34
Experimental: InterventionStudent Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)T369.79 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 17.21
Treatment as UsualStudent Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)T162.43 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 18.27
Treatment as UsualStudent Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)T267.35 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 15.97
Treatment as UsualStudent Scientific Academic Vocabulary (SAV) Word Meaning (AVM)T361.80 percentage of vocabulary words correctStandard Deviation 23.37
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.022t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Parent Academic Support (AEB)

AEB will measure parent academic support behaviors (20 items). Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 9-point response option (1 = nothing, 9 = a great deal) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .94) and could range from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicated greater efficacy to influence school performance.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionParent Academic Support (AEB)T17.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Experimental: InterventionParent Academic Support (AEB)T27.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Experimental: InterventionParent Academic Support (AEB)T37.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Treatment as UsualParent Academic Support (AEB)T17.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
Treatment as UsualParent Academic Support (AEB)T27.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Treatment as UsualParent Academic Support (AEB)T37.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.289t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Parent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)

AVC will measure parent confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .95) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionParent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T12.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Experimental: InterventionParent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T22.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Experimental: InterventionParent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T32.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Treatment as UsualParent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T12.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Treatment as UsualParent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T22.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Treatment as UsualParent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T32.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.245t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Parent Use of SAV: AVUB

AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in parent use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .91) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionParent Use of SAV: AVUBT11.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Experimental: InterventionParent Use of SAV: AVUBT22.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Experimental: InterventionParent Use of SAV: AVUBT32.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Treatment as UsualParent Use of SAV: AVUBT11.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Treatment as UsualParent Use of SAV: AVUBT22.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Treatment as UsualParent Use of SAV: AVUBT32.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.005t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Student Academic Learning (ALB)

ALB will measure student academic learning behaviors (20 items). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .90) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater levels of perceived academic learning behaviors.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionStudent Academic Learning (ALB)T14.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Experimental: InterventionStudent Academic Learning (ALB)T24.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Experimental: InterventionStudent Academic Learning (ALB)T33.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Treatment as UsualStudent Academic Learning (ALB)T14.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Treatment as UsualStudent Academic Learning (ALB)T24.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Treatment as UsualStudent Academic Learning (ALB)T34.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.296t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Student Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)

AVC will measure student confidence in using SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items were developed using procedures for developing self-efficacy scales (Bandura et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all confident, 5 = extremely confident) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater confidence using SAV words.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionStudent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T12.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Experimental: InterventionStudent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T22.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Experimental: InterventionStudent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T33.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Treatment as UsualStudent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T12.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Treatment as UsualStudent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T22.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Treatment as UsualStudent Confidence in Using SAV Words (AVC)T33.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.712t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Student Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)

STEM will measure student interest in choosing STEM careers (4 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010) and the Efficacy to Influence School-related Performance subscale of the Parental Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES; Bandura, et al., 2001). Items used a 5-point response option (1 = not at all interested, 5 = extremely interested) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .69) and could range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater interest using SAV words.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionStudent Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)T13.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Experimental: InterventionStudent Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)T23.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Experimental: InterventionStudent Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)T32.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Treatment as UsualStudent Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)T13.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Treatment as UsualStudent Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)T22.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Treatment as UsualStudent Interest in Choosing STEM Careers (STEM)T33.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.282t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Student Use of SAV: AVUB

AVUB (Academic Vocabulary Usage Behaviors) will measure change in student use of SAV words (10 items). Items were adapted from: the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI; Betts, Appleton, Reschly, et al., 2010). Items used a 4-point response option (1 = not at all, 4 = 3-4 times per week) and a mean score was computed (alpha = .89) and could range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater use of SAV words.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-treatment), and 24 weeks (post-treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: InterventionStudent Use of SAV: AVUBT12.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Experimental: InterventionStudent Use of SAV: AVUBT22.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Experimental: InterventionStudent Use of SAV: AVUBT32.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Treatment as UsualStudent Use of SAV: AVUBT12.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Treatment as UsualStudent Use of SAV: AVUBT22.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Treatment as UsualStudent Use of SAV: AVUBT32.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Comparison: The results show the condition x time interaction from the growth model, and the parameter estimate describes the relative change of the intervention condition to the treatment-as-usual condition, for a unit change in time.p-value: 0.502t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026