Computer-assisted Surgery, Maxillofacial Abnormalities, Virtual Surgical Planning
Conditions
Keywords
Computer-Assisted Surgery, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Patient-Specific Modelling
Brief summary
The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee and was conducted in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on medical research. A total of 335 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial reconstruction were recorded from Jan 2014 to Jun 2020. Reconstruction with computer-assisted surgery ( CAS), which included, virtual surgical planning, computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) surgical guides/templates and pre-bent plates on 3D printed models. Reasons for tissue defect were oncologic, osteoradionecrosis, trauma and osteoporosis. Patients undergoing dental implant placement and orthognathic surgery were excluded. Finally, 136 patients were selected and the reasons for partial or abandon surgical plan performance were described and analyzed.
Detailed description
computer-aided design
Interventions
The reconstruction was performed with the help of virtual surgical plan and 3D printed models.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Maxillofacial reconstruction with CAS, including virtual surgical planning, CAD-CAM surgical guides/templates and pre-bent plates on 3D printed models. 2. Reasons for reconstruction were oncologic, osteoradionecrosis, trauma and osteoporosis.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients undergoing computer-assisted implant surgery were excluded. 2. Patients undergoing computer-assisted orthognathic surgery were excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The adherence of computer-assisted surgery | The outcome were recorded preoperatively or intraoperatively | The original plans were classified as completely executed, partially executed or abandoned. |