Brain Injuries, Neurodegeneration, Neurologic Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to assess the impact of the choice of visual feedback solution (immersive via CAVE and VR headset; non-immersive via screen only) on driving performance and quality of experience on a physical driving simulator and its acceptability to wheelchair drivers with neurological disorders.
Detailed description
The device under investigation is an electric wheelchair driving simulation solution driving simulation solution for electric wheelchairs, based on a physical physical simulation device that integrates software allowing virtual virtual immersion. This device will be coupled with three visual simulation solutions: a virtual reality helmet, a CAVE (virtual reality room where video virtual reality room where video projectors display content on four sides) and a non-immersive projection (screen only, non-immersive virtual reality solution). This device is intended to allow patients who may acquire a power wheelchair to train in a virtual environment, which is conducive to the safety of the training, its repetition, and to produce more varied training environments, richer and more adapted to specific and individualised needs. These solutions could facilitate access to real driving for patients who are currently experiencing learning difficulties.
Interventions
DEVICEImmersive condition (CAVE)
Driving course with obstacles in a CAVE system
DEVICEImmersive condition (HMD)
Driving course with obstacles with a virtual reality headset
DEVICENon Immersive condition (Screen alone)
Driving course with obstacles on a screen with physical simulator
DEVICENon Immersive condition (Screen with physical simulator)
Driving course with obstacles on a screen only
Sponsors
INSA Rennes
Pôle Saint Hélier
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This is a pilot, prospective, single-centre, controlled, randomised, crossover, open-label, study. (RIPH2)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female, over 18 years of age, * Patient with neurological disorders such as brain injury or neurodegeneration, * Having been prescribed an electric wheelchair and circulating in electric wheelchair for more than 3 months * Of which electric wheelchair is the main mode of travel * Whose physical measurements (weight, height) are compatible with the use of the physical simulator chosen for the development of the robotic assistance module, i.e. according to the manufacturer's data 140 kg max and 51 cm max seat width. * Having freely consented to participate in the study, * In the case of curatorship, having read the patient information document and given his/her free and informed consent to participate in the study, in the presence of his/her curator, * In the case of a guardianship, the legal representative having read the information document intended for the legal guardian of an adult under legal protection (under guardianship) and given his or her free and informed consent for the person for whom he or she is responsible to participate in the study (in agreement with the patient)
Exclusion criteria
* Comprehension problems that prevent the protocol from being carried out, * Motor disorders of the upper limb requiring additional technical driving assistance, * A patient who has expressed difficulties with internal and/or external driving safety on the basis of the WST, * Patients who were included in the SIMADAPT1 study to avoid bias due to their experience in the simulator and virtual reality, * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women, * Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons under psychiatric care or for purposes other than research, * Minor, * Person in emergency situation unable to give prior consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| number of the collisions with the environment on the standardised circuit | During the driving course, from the beginning to the end of the circuit. | It will be compared in 4 conditions : * immersive 1: physical simulator and CAVE\_condition A1 * immersive 2: physical simulator and virtual reality helmet\_condition A2 * non-immersive 1: screen and physical simulator\_condition B1 * non-immersive 2: screen only without simulator\_condition B2 Day 1 : A + B Day 8 : A + B |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| evaluation of driving performance with Wheelchair Skill Test (WST-Q-T 5.1) | Immediately after intervention | The Wheelchair Skill Test (WST-Q-T 5.1) will be completed by two evaluators after each condition. The score will be between 0 to 22, a high score will represent a good driving performance |
| visual information (VICON® system) | During the driving course, from the beginning to the end of the circuit. | The number of head movement will be measured by VICON system. |
| the cognitive load of carrying out the circuit with National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index | Immediately after intervention | The cognitive load of tests under each conditions will be measured by the NASA-Task Load Index. It is in the form of six scales where the participant must assign a score between zero and one hundred to each of them, score indicating a growing level of intensity. Three dimensions relate to the demands imposed on the subject (mental, physical and temporal demands) and three to the interaction of a subject with the task (effort, frustration and performance) |
| the time taken to complete the course | During the driving course, from the beginning to the end of the circuit. | It will be measured, in minutes and seconds, under the various conditions |
| discomfort of driving in immersive reality, | Immediately after intervention | The occurrence of kinetosis will be evaluated with Graybiel score by the two evaluators after each passage in each condition. The score is between 1 to 50. A high score shows the patient's discomfort. |
| satisfaction of the testers and the acceptability of the various conditions simulated | Immediately after intervention | Patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being very satisfied. |
| the acceptability of the various conditions simulated | Immediately after intervention | Evaluation of acceptability with Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) after each condition |
| sensation of immersion and the feeling of presence in a virtual situation (Igroup Presence Questionnaire IPQ) | Immediately after intervention | It will be evaluated and compared by Igroup Presence Questionnaire IPQ. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed