Skip to content

Digital VS. Conventional Ear Impression

An Innovative Approach for Auricular Rehabilitation Using Two Types Digital Impression Versus Conventional Techniques:

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04893902
Enrollment
8
Registered
2021-05-20
Start date
2021-05-15
Completion date
2021-05-17
Last updated
2021-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Loss His Ear and Need Auricular Prosthesis

Keywords

Ear impression -Ear scanning-intraoral scanner-scannin marker-ear prosthesis

Brief summary

What is known: Ear impressions are made in conventional manner by impression materials which may affect the accuracy of the obtained data and consume time and effort . What this study adds: Predesigned ear markers facilitate ear scanning using an intraoral scanner that decreases the probability of in-accuracies using the conventional manner with less time and effort

Detailed description

Prosthodontic maxillofacial rehabilitation of acquired or congenital ear defects is considered a challenging procedure. This clinical trial introduces a novel approach for digital scanning of the unaffected contralateral ear using an intraoral scanner in comparison to the conventional impression techniques. CAD/CAM is a very promising design and fabrication of an auricular prosthesis for patients with unilateral ear defects. Purpose: This study aims to compare digital impression technique using an intra-oral digital scanner IOSfor the unaffected ear with markers /without markers versus traditional techniques with hydro colloidal impression materials.

Interventions

DEVICEmedit intra oral scanner

ear scanning with intra oral scanner

Sponsors

Mohamed Mahmoud Dohiem
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

control clinical rial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* any normal patient

Exclusion criteria

* no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
total deviation between Conventional auricular impression and two types of digital impression1 day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
total deviation between two types of digital impression1 day

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed M dohiem, lecturer
mdohiem@zu.edu.eg01002411965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026