Skip to content

CoQuit Study for Smoking Cessation

A Mobile App Based Cognitive Dissonance Intervention for Smoking Cessation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04893460
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-05-19
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2021-09-29
Last updated
2025-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Smoking Cessation

Brief summary

This study investigated the feasibility of a cognitive dissonance-based mobile app for smoking cessation (CDI). Cognitive dissonance refers to the conflict between beliefs and behaviors; interventions are designed to promote this conflict to motivate people to change their behavior. Recent research has demonstrated the efficacy and potential of using cognitive dissonance interventions for a wide range of health and behavioral problems including smoking cessation. This study developed an initial version of the CDI mobile app and evaluated the app in an evaluation study with 60 adult smokers.

Detailed description

An initial version of the CoQuit app was developed and tested with 60 adult smokers. All participants were recruited through social media and were screened and consented online. After enrolling, participants received a link to the baseline survey which asked about past and current tobacco use, nicotine dependence, motivation to quit, cognitive dissonance and demographic information. All participants were assigned to an online support group of 5 or 6 people. The group received simultaneous invites to the app so they were able to move through the 25 day program together. The app contained short videos of a CoQuit facilitator who presented instructions for specific tasks, such as writing a brief letter to a friend or family member explaining their commitment to stop smoking. Participants recorded videos of themselves related to these activities and posted the videos within the app where they were viewed by other members of the group. All participants completed a six weeks post baseline online assessment asking about past and current tobacco use, quit attempts, as well as feedback on usability and possible improvements to the app.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCoQuit App

The CoQuit App is a cognitive dissonance based app for smoking cessation.

Sponsors

Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older * Self-reported daily smoking * Having a valid home mailing address * English speaking * Access to a smart phone with video capability and internet * Expressed desire to quit smoking

Exclusion criteria

* Currently participating in any tobacco cessation programs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive DissonanceBaseline, 5 times during app use (days 3, 6, 10, 14 and 19 of the 25 day program), Six weeks post baselineParticipants were asked to give a gut-level response to 14 words used to describe various attributes of cognitive dissonance (e.g., uncomfortable, shame). Response options for each attribute were on a 7-point scale (1 = does not apply at all, 7 = applies very much). A mean score was computed across all 14 words. A higher score was associated with greater levels of cognitive dissonance. In addition to the baseline and six-week follow-up assessment of cognitive dissonance, participants were asked five times during the 25 days of using the app. The five times were after completing the Costs activity on day 3, the Quit Letter activity on day 6, the Planning for Pitfalls activity on day 10, the Staying Smoke Free activity on day 14, and the Letter to Youth activity on day 19.
Number of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline and Six Weeks Post BaselineA one-item question that asked about the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Response options were on a 6-point scale, where 1 = 5 or less, 2 = 6-10, 3 = 11-15, 4 = 16-20, 5 = 21-30, and 6 = 31 or more. A higher score indicates a greater number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Readiness to QuitBaseline, 5 times during app use (days 3, 6, 10, 14 and 19 of the 25 day program), Six weeks post baselineParticipants were asked to rate what best describes how they currently think about quitting smoking. The one item had a 1-point scale (0 = I have no thought about quitting smoking, 2 = I think I need to consider quitting smoking someday, 5 = I think I should quit smoking, but I am not quite ready, 8 = I am starting to think about how to reduce the number of cigarettes I smoke a day, 10 = I am taking action to quit smoking, 11 = I have stopped smoking). A higher score was associated with greater readiness to quit smoking. In addition to the baseline and six-week follow-up assessment of readiness to quit, participants were asked five times during the 25 days of using the app. The five times were after completing the Costs activity on day 3, the Quit Letter activity on day 6, the Planning for Pitfalls activity on day 10, the Staying Smoke Free activity on day 14, and the Letter to Youth activity on day 19.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
All participants will use the CoQuit App for Smoking Cessation CoQuit App: The CoQuit App is a cognitive dissonance based app for smoking cessation.
72
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention
Age, Continuous48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Education Level
Bachelor degree
11 Participants
Education Level
Did not graduate high school
2 Participants
Education Level
Doctorate degree
1 Participants
Education Level
High school graduate
10 Participants
Education Level
Master degree
6 Participants
Education Level
Some college, no degree
26 Participants
Education Level
Technical school or Associate degree
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Cognitive Dissonance

Participants were asked to give a gut-level response to 14 words used to describe various attributes of cognitive dissonance (e.g., uncomfortable, shame). Response options for each attribute were on a 7-point scale (1 = does not apply at all, 7 = applies very much). A mean score was computed across all 14 words. A higher score was associated with greater levels of cognitive dissonance. In addition to the baseline and six-week follow-up assessment of cognitive dissonance, participants were asked five times during the 25 days of using the app. The five times were after completing the Costs activity on day 3, the Quit Letter activity on day 6, the Planning for Pitfalls activity on day 10, the Staying Smoke Free activity on day 14, and the Letter to Youth activity on day 19.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 times during app use (days 3, 6, 10, 14 and 19 of the 25 day program), Six weeks post baseline

Population: Due to conceptual concerns about imputing smoking status, decreases in smoking from pretest to posttest were evaluated with participants who completed both the pretest and posttest assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCognitive DissonanceBaseline2.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
InterventionCognitive DissonanceIn app 1 - After Costs Activity3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
InterventionCognitive DissonanceIn app 2 - After Quit Letter Activity4.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
InterventionCognitive DissonanceIn app 3 - After Pitfalls Activity3.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
InterventionCognitive DissonanceIn app 4 - After Smoke Free Activity3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
InterventionCognitive DissonanceIn app 5 - After Letter to Youth Activity3.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
InterventionCognitive Dissonance6 Weeks Post Baseline2.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
p-value: 0.003t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This model is a paired t-test that tests for change in cognitive dissonance from baseline to after the Quit Letter activityp-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This model is a paired t-test that tests for change in cognitive dissonance from baseline to after the Pitfalls activityp-value: 0.004t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This model is a paired t-test that tests for change in cognitive dissonance from baseline to after the Smoke Free activityp-value: 0.098t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This model is a paired t-test that tests for change in cognitive dissonance from baseline to after the Letter to Youth activityp-value: 0.042t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This model is a paired t-test that tests for change in cognitive dissonance from baseline to 6 weeks post baseline.p-value: 0.364t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Number of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day

A one-item question that asked about the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Response options were on a 6-point scale, where 1 = 5 or less, 2 = 6-10, 3 = 11-15, 4 = 16-20, 5 = 21-30, and 6 = 31 or more. A higher score indicates a greater number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Time frame: Baseline and Six Weeks Post Baseline

Population: Due to conceptual concerns about imputing smoking status, decreases in smoking from pretest to posttest was evaluated with participants who completed both the pretest and posttest number of cigarettes smoked item.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day6 Weeks Post Baseline31 or more0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline5 or less0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline6-1012 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline11-1513 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline16-2010 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline21-3011 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per DayBaseline31 or more0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day6 Weeks Post Baseline5 or less13 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day6 Weeks Post Baseline6-1016 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day6 Weeks Post Baseline11-155 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day6 Weeks Post Baseline16-209 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Number Cigarettes Smoked Per Day6 Weeks Post Baseline21-303 Participants
Comparison: The non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate whether participants were smoking fewer cigarettes per day.p-value: <0.001Wilcoxson Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Readiness to Quit

Participants were asked to rate what best describes how they currently think about quitting smoking. The one item had a 1-point scale (0 = I have no thought about quitting smoking, 2 = I think I need to consider quitting smoking someday, 5 = I think I should quit smoking, but I am not quite ready, 8 = I am starting to think about how to reduce the number of cigarettes I smoke a day, 10 = I am taking action to quit smoking, 11 = I have stopped smoking). A higher score was associated with greater readiness to quit smoking. In addition to the baseline and six-week follow-up assessment of readiness to quit, participants were asked five times during the 25 days of using the app. The five times were after completing the Costs activity on day 3, the Quit Letter activity on day 6, the Planning for Pitfalls activity on day 10, the Staying Smoke Free activity on day 14, and the Letter to Youth activity on day 19.

Time frame: Baseline, 5 times during app use (days 3, 6, 10, 14 and 19 of the 25 day program), Six weeks post baseline

Population: Due to conceptual concerns about imputing smoking data, readiness to quit from was evaluated with participants who completed both the pretest and posttest readiness items.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionReadiness to QuitBaseline7.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
InterventionReadiness to QuitIn app 1 - After Costs Activity7.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
InterventionReadiness to QuitIn app 2 - After Quit Latter Activity8.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
InterventionReadiness to QuitIn app 3 - After Pitfalls Activity8.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
InterventionReadiness to QuitIn app 4 - After Smoke Free Activity8.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
InterventionReadiness to QuitIn app 5 - After Letter to Youth Activity8.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
InterventionReadiness to Quit6 week Post Baseline7.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
p-value: 0.776t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.219t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.043t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.219t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.11t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.868t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026