Skip to content

Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures

Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures Based On Different İrrigation Activation Tecniques: A Randomized, Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04892355
Enrollment
140
Registered
2021-05-19
Start date
2022-08-06
Completion date
2022-11-06
Last updated
2022-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endodontically Treated Teeth

Keywords

EDDY, EndoActivatör, Xp-endo Finisher, Postoperative pain

Brief summary

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different irrigation activation systems on pain after endodontic treatment in molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Post-operative pain values of the participants will be recorded and evaluated with the VAS scale. Postoperative pain values of the techniques will be compared with statistical evaluation.

Detailed description

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different irrigation activation systems on pain after endodontic treatment in molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Materials and Methods: The study will be carried out on 140 patients with molar teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. After the root canal preparation is completed, the patients will be divided into 4 groups according to the irrigation activation system; Conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), EDDY, EndoActivator (EA) and Xp-endo Finisher (XPF). After the irrigation process is completed, the root canals will be filled using gutta-percha and canal sealer and the treatment will be completed in one session. Pain values at 6, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days after treatment will be evaluated at a 0.05% significance level using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Interventions

Devices used during root canal irrigation

Sponsors

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

4-group clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy patients ranging between 18 and 60 years in age * Patients that experienced moderate-to-severe pain represented on a visual analogue scale (VAS) * Maxillar and Mandibular molar teeth were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Exclusion criteria

* Any systemic disease and pregnancy in the patient * Having used analgesic-anti-inflammatory in the last 12 hours and cortisone for the last 6 months * The patient has bruxism * Teeth with severe damage * Teeth with calcified canals * Teeth with pain to percussion * Teeth with periapical radiolucency * Teeth with root resorption * Teeth with an immature / open apex * Teeth with previous RCT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures Based On Different İrrigation Activation Tecniques: A Randomized, Clinical Trialone week(7 days)Preoperative pain of the patients before the treatment was recorded with the VAS scale. Pain levels were classified as 0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain .After the treatment of the patients, a pain assessment form was given to the patient in order to evaluate the postoperative pain. Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on the VAS scale. The marking procedure was taught to the patients by a blinded researcher from the groups. When the patients came to the control appointment, VAS scales were collected and the data were analyzed.

Contacts

Primary Contactyahya güven
yahyaguven52@outlook.com05314599583

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026