Skip to content

Induction of Labor by Oral Misoprostol Solution

A Randomised Control Study of Titrated and Static Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04891679
Acronym
OMS
Enrollment
264
Registered
2021-05-18
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2021-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labor

Brief summary

AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of titrated oral misoprostol solution (OMS) in comparison with static-dose oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor at term. Women with singleton live pregnancy at term without any complications who were admitted in labor room for induction of labor were enrolled. Study involves allocation of selected women in two groups randomly and use of either titrated or static oral misoprostol dose regimen to induce labor. Possible benefits included rapid induction of labor with oral drug regimen which is easier to comply as compared to vaginal regimens. Women were at risk of all the complications associated with induction of labor like labor abnormalities, risk of cesarean section, non reassuring fetal status.

Detailed description

This comparative randomized study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christian medical college and hospital, Ludhiana for a period of one year beginning from 1st December, 2017 to 30th November, 2018. The study group comprised of all antenatal women admitted in labor room at term for induction of labor. Informed consent was taken for all selected women. Women were subjected to detailed history taking, a complete physical examination including per vaginum examination (to calculate modified bishop's score and to rule out cephalopelvic disproportion), investigations and a NST. Gestational age was established by the first date of the last menstrual period and confirmed by first trimester ultrasound. Presentation was confirmed by palpation and third trimester ultrasound. Women after randomization were allocated into two groups. The first group (A) was induced with hourly titrated oral misoprostol regimen and the second group (B) received two hourly static oral misoprostol regimen. Once labor had started, vital signs were closely monitored every 2 hours; fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine activity every 15 minutes during first stage of labor. Per vaginum examination was done 4-hourly or as indicated. Primary and secondary outcome measures were noted and analyzed to compare safety and efficacy of titrated and oral misoprstol solution.

Interventions

Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours. Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below. 0 hour= 20ml 1. hour= 20ml 2. hour= 30ml 3. hour= 30ml 4. hour= 30ml 5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.

Sponsors

Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Women were randomized (1:1) into the treatment groups A) Titrated-dose OMS group B) Static dose OMS group; using computer generated number sequence. Allocation concealment was carried out by using opaque envelopes that were distributed by the obstetrics nurse. Whereas study investigators and attending care teams were aware of the allocated arm, patients were kept blinded to the allocation. Study investigators and outcome assessors could not be blinded as the data collection and analysis included outcome measures like timing of oral misoprostol solution doses.

Intervention model description

Single center interventional single-blinded randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Singleton live pregnancy; 2. ≥37 weeks gestation; 3. Cephalic presentation; 4. Reassuring fetal heart rate; 5. Modified Bishop'score

Exclusion criteria

1. Hypersensitivity to misoprostol; 2. Uterine scar due to previous cesarean section or other uterine surgery; 3. Grand multipara; 4. Multiple gestations; 5. High risk pregnanacies • preeeclampsia with severe features • significant maternal cardiac,renal, liver disease 6. Any contraindication to induction and vaginal delivery e.g. cephalopelvic disproportion, malpresentation, fetal compromise and ante partum hemorrhage 7. Intrauterine fetal demise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interval between induction and deliveryFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution (titrated/static) to childbirth; upto 5 daysThe time taken from induction of labor to delivery measured as 1\) \<12 hours 2) 12-24 hours 3) 24-48 hours 4) \>48 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of misoprostol dosesFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 daysMeasured as 1-2; 3-4; 5-6; 7-8; \>9
Time taken to give required dosesFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 daysMeasured as 1-4 hours; 5-8 hours; 9-12 hours; 13-16 hours; 17-20 hours; 21-24 hours
Total misoprostol dosageFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 daysMeasured as \</=75mcg; 76-150mcg; 151-225mcg; 226-300mcg; \>301 mcg
Mode of deliveryUpto 5 days from first dose of oral misoprostol solutionIn terms of Vaginal delivery/LSCS
Mean change in modified Bishop's scoreFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 daysMeasured as difference between modified bishop's score before induction of labor and at amniotomy/stopping of oral misoprostol solution regimen; minimum 0f 1 to maximum of 7.
Oxytocin augmentationFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 daysRequired/Not required
Maternal morbidityFrom first dose of oral misoprostol solution to dischage from hospital; upto 7 daysIn terms of incidence of either of the following: 1. Incidence of tachysystole 2. Fever- intrapartum and postpartum 3. Puerperal sepsis 4. Uterine rupture
Neonatal parametersFrom childbirth to discharge of the baby; upto 1 monthMeasured in terms of incidence of either of the following: 1. Incidence of meconium-stained liquor 2. APGAR scores at 1,5 min 3. NICU stay
Indication for LSCSUpto 5 days from first dose of oral misoprostol solutionDivided into either of the following: 1. SECONDARY ARREST OF DILATATION 2. MSAF IN EARLY LABOR 3. CTG CATEGORY III 4. FAILED INDUCTION 5. CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION 6. CORD PROLAPSE 7. DEEP TRANSVERSE ARREST 8. ARREST OF DESCENT OF HEAD

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026