Skip to content

A Comparative Analysis of REVOLVE, LipoGrafter, and Viality in Autologous Fat Grafting During Breast Surgery

A Comparative Analysis of REVOLVE, LipoGrafter, and Viality in Autologous Fat Grafting During Breast Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04891510
Enrollment
135
Registered
2021-05-18
Start date
2021-05-19
Completion date
2028-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Reconstruction, Mammaplasty, Mastectomy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn whether there is a superior fat processing method in terms of graft retention in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Interventions

DEVICEREVOLVE Advanced Adipose System

The REVOLVE system is an all-in-one fat processing device that harvests, filters, actively washes, and removes strands from lipoaspirate and allows for reinjection without any additional manipulation (REVOLVE 2020).

DEVICELipoGrafter

The LipoGrafter system is designed to be a start-to-finish closed system with minimal processing of the lipoaspirate, minimizing the risk of contamination and fat cell damage (LipoGrafter 2020).

PROCEDUREViality

The Viality system uses the AuraClens solution that acts as a surfactant to bring impurities like blood, free oil, and cellular debris into solution, where they can be flushed out through suction.

Sponsors

Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female; * Documented history of previous breast surgery (either complete or partial mastectomy); * Available harvest sites for fat grafting as documented by plastic surgeon; * BMI \> 20; * Anticipated harvested fat volume \> 50cc; * Competency and willingness to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

* Suspected or known to be pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in efficacy of fat grafting technique, as measured by 3D volumetric scanning at the surgical siteBaseline, 90 day follow-up3D volumetric scanning assesses the fat graft retention defined as the ratio of fat remaining at the surgical site at 90 day follow-up to that at pre-operative baseline.
Change in patient satisfaction of fat grafting technique, as measured by the BREAST-Q questionnaireBaseline, 90 day follow-upThe BREAST-Q questionnaire is used for measuring pre- and postoperative psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being, satisfaction with breasts, experience of care, and satisfaction with outcome. Scores range on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of palpable masses from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam.90 day follow-upThe physical exam will provide the number of palpable masses at the surgical site.
Number of lesions of probable fat necrosis from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-upThe physical exam will provide the number of lesions of probable fat necrosis at the surgical site
Presence of infection from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-upThe physical exam will show if there is infection present at the surgical site. This is a binary "yes/no" item.
Presence seroma from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-upThe physical exam will show if there is seroma present at the surgical site. This is a binary "yes/no" item.
Assessment of wound healing from the fat grafting technique, as measured by a physical exam90 day follow-upThe physical exam will show if wound healing is normal or delayed at the surgical site. This is a binary "normal/delayed" item.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMichael B Amrami, MPH
mia7046@med.cornell.edu646-544-7658
CONTACTDaana Bajnauth
dab4001@med.cornell.edu646-789-1447
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDavid Otterburn, MD

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026