Skip to content

Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in the Early Postoperative Course Following Lung Transplantation

Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in the Early Postoperative Course Following Lung Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04891094
Acronym
LUS
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-05-18
Start date
2021-04-16
Completion date
2022-05-15
Last updated
2022-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Transplantation

Keywords

Lung ultrasound, Lung transplantation, primary graft dysfunction, Lung Sliding

Brief summary

This feasibility study tries to define the value of daily Lung and Diaphragm Ultrasound in the early postoperative course following Lung transplantation by comparing its diagnostic accuracy with that of standard of care diagnostic procedures

Detailed description

Lung transplantation remains a high risk procedure. Common complications in the early postoperative course are, among others, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), hemorrhage, anastomosis insufficiency leading to pneumothorax, pneumonia, atelectasis and diaphragm dysfunction. Early diagnosis of complications is important to avoid further deterioration. Lung ultrasound (LUS) and diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for identifying frequent conditions in the critically ill. Studies evaluating its value in patients following lung transplantation are missing. This study investigates the feasibility and clinical ability of LUS and DUS to identify common complications following lung transplantation and compares it to standard of care diagnostic procedures. The investigators start a prospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients who undergo lung transplantation at the university hospital Munich. Daily LUS and DUS in the early postoperative phase will be performed to detect and monitor complications. The US results will be compared to the results of diagnostic procedures of the clinical routine such as clinical examination, chest x ray, hemodynamic monitoring, expert opinion on PGD and laboratory parameters. The hypothesis is that daily LUS and DUS following lung transplantation helps to diagnose complications early and with higher accuracy compared to the results of diagnostic procedures of the clinical routine.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTUltrasound

daily ultrasound of the lung and the diaphragm

Sponsors

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* informed consent * patient following lung transplantation

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The value of LUS in diagnosing PGDpostoperative day 3number of days with PGD in LUS versus standard of care
Is Lung Sliding reliable in the early postoperative course following lung transplantation?postoperative day 3Number of days with detectable lung sliding in LUS. Number of days with detectable pneumothorax in LUS.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026