Skip to content

Reducing Depression-related Stigma and Increasing-treatment Seeking Among Black Adolescents

Reducing Depression-related Stigma and Increasing-treatment Seeking Among Black Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04890990
Enrollment
1291
Registered
2021-05-18
Start date
2021-07-15
Completion date
2021-08-07
Last updated
2021-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Racism

Brief summary

The purposes of this study are to: 1. test among adolescent the utility of brief video-based interventions to reduce stigma-related attitudes and increase help-seeking intentions toward depression; 2. examine the role of race (Black vs other) as an independent factor in the primary outcome.

Detailed description

Intervention videos will each be of \ 120-second duration and feature an underage female professional (age 16) acting as a simulated patient. All three videos will focus on her as an empowered presenter with depression sharing her personal story regarding depression and describe how social supports from family, friends, and community, as well as professional help assisted her in overcoming symptoms of the illness. Assessments will occur at baseline and post-intervention, and will include: 1. Demographics (baseline only); 2. Primary outcome: Depression-related stigma(Depression Stigma Scale \[DSS\]) summary score. 3. Secondary outcomes: a. DSS individual items; b. Help-seeking (General Help-Seeking Questionnaire \[GHSQ\]) summary score and individual items; and bc Racial attitudes: feelings thermometers. The investigators intend to randomly assign \ 1,000 individuals aged 14-18 as follows: Subjects oversampled for Black participants (50% Black; 50% other); Randomized, in equal proportions, and stratified by race, to view one of three \ 120-second videos of a girl with: 1. No depression control (Black; BC); 2. Depression (Black, following same script as in our earlier study (Amsalem and Martin, 2021), DB); and 3. Depression adjusted (Black, with script adjusted based on input from focus group of Black girls and women; DBa).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShort videos

Intervention videos will each be of 90-second duration and feature two underage professionals (ages 16) acting as a simulated patient. All videos will focus on an empowered presenter with depression sharing her personal story regarding depression and describe how social supports from family, friends, and community, as well as professional help assisted her in overcoming symptoms of the illness. The actors will include a Black girl and a white girl.

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English-speaking * Living in the US * Ages 14 - 18

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Depression-related stigma (Depression Stigma Scale [DSS]; Personal component only): TOTAL SCOREBefore / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)The DSS (Christensen, Jorm, Evans, & Groves, 2004) is a self-report instrument composed of two 9-item subscales. The first subscale measures the participants' own/ personal attitudes, and the second measures participants' beliefs about the attitudes of others ('Depression is sign of weakness' vs. 'Most people believe that depression is a sign of weakness'). We will use the Personal subscale (DSS-Personal) in this study. The DSS has a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The total score comprises the sum of its item scores, and a higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome). The DSS-Personal subscale has shown adequate psychometric properties: 0.71 test-retest reliability, 0.76 internal consistency (Griffiths et al., 2004). In our earlier study (Amsalem and Martin, 2021), Cronbach's a was .83.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Racial attitudes: feelings thermometerBefore / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)We will use a feelings thermometer, modeled after Norton and Herek, 2013: Using a scale from zero to 100, please tell us your personal feelings toward each of the following groups of friends, teachers, or colleagues. As you do this task, think of an imaginary thermometer. The warmer or more favorable you feel toward the group, the higher the number you should give it. The colder or less favorable you feel, the lower the number. If you feel neither warm nor cold toward the group, rate it 50. To familiarize respondents with the response format, they will be first presented with thermometers for Men in general and Women in general, with each respondent rating her or his own sex first. Next, they rate racially different groups (white women, white men, Black women, Black men) with the order of presentation randomized. Higher ratings (maximum 100) indicate warmer, more favorable feelings toward the target whereas lower ratings (minimum 0) indicate colder, more negative feelings.
Change in DSS Item 1Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)People with depression could snap out of it if they wanted Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 2Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Depression is a sign of personal weakness Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 3Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Depression is not a real medical illness Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 4Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)People with depression are dangerous Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 5Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)It is best to avoid people with depression, so you don't become depressed yourself Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 6Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)People with depression are unpredictable Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 7Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)If I had depression, I would not tell anyone Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 8Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)I would not employ someone if I knew they had been depressed Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in DSS Item 9Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)I would not vote for a politician if I knew they had been depressed Scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). A higher score indicates more stigma (worse outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 1Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Intimate partner (e.g., girlfriend, boyfriend) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 2Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Friend (not related to you) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 3Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Parent Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 4Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Other relative/family member Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 5Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist, social worker, counselor) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in Help-seeking (General Help-Seeking Questionnaire [GHSQ]; Emotional and Suicide components): MEAN SCOREBefore / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)The General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ) (Wilson, Deane, Marshall, & Dalley, 2008) was developed to measure help-seeking intentions from different sources (friend, parent, mental health professional, and others) and is divided into personal-emotional problems and suicidal thoughts (Ibrahim et al., 2019). The instrument consists of 10 items for each part, measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). One question is stated as 'I would not seek help from anyone' and is reverse-scored. Higher scores on this scale indicate more help seeking (better outcome). The GHSQ has shown good psychometric properties: Cronbach's alpha = .70 and test-retest of .86 for personal-emotional problems, and Cronbach's alpha = .83 and test-retest of .88 for suicidal thoughts.
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 7Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Doctor/GP Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 8Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Minister or religious leader (e.g., Priest, Rabbi, Chaplain) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 9Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)I would not seek help from anyone \*\*REVERSE SCORED ITEM\*\* Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). LOWER scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 10Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)I would seek help from another not listed above Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 1Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Intimate partner (e.g., girlfriend, boyfriend) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 2Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Friend (not related to you) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 3Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Parent Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 4Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Other relative/family member Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 5Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist, social worker, counselor) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 6Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Phone helpline (e.g., lifeline) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 7Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Doctor/GP Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 8Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Minister or religious leader (e.g., Priest, Rabbi, Chaplain) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 9Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)I would not seek help from anyone \*\*REVERSE SCORED ITEM\*\* Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). LOWER scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Suicide Item 10Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)I would seek help from another not listed above Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).
Change in GHSQ Emotional Item 6Before / after viewing videos (within 10 minutes)Phone helpline (e.g., lifeline) Measured with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (extremely unlikely) to 7 (extremely likely). Higher scores on this item indicate more help seeking (better outcome).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026