Skip to content

Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices

Canine Retraction Using Power Arms and Temporary Anchorage Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04887974
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-05-14
Start date
2016-04-02
Completion date
2017-01-14
Last updated
2021-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bimaxillary Protrusion, Class III Malocclusion, Class II Malocclusion, Crowding, Tooth

Brief summary

Various malocclusions require the extraction of the first premolars and retraction of the canines with the need for maximum anchorage. If the canines are pulled into the extraction space using the molar teeth for support, unwanted tooth movement occurs. This study aims to evaluate the effect of temporary anchorage devices and power arms, which are auxiliary orthodontic appliances in reducing undesirable tooth movements.

Detailed description

In orthodontic patients who require overjet correction, increased facial convexity, or relief of severe crowding, dental extraction followed by canine retraction is indicated. In conventional orthodontic treatment, the molars are used for anchorage and reinforced with intra-oral or extra-oral appliances. Although effective, this produces unwanted side effects where the molars move mesially and rotate, taking up some of the extraction space. As the canines move into the extraction space they tip backward requiring further uprighting. Power arms are vertical metal extensions placed in the canine brackets. They direct the force to the center of resistance of the tooth to allow bodily movement and prevent canine tipping. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) are minimally invasive, small screws, inserted in the jaw bones to act as anchorage units instead of the molars. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the TADs and power arms on the efficiency of canine retraction including the rate of canine retraction and canine tipping as well as mesial molar drift and rotation. The null hypothesis is that the use of the power arm and the TADs have no effect on the canine retraction rate. This study is a single-arm, single-center study. Twenty quadrants in 10 adult patients will be selected from the Orthodontic Outpatient Clinic at the Future University in Egypt. Orthodontic records will be collected including study models, intra- and extra-oral photographs and cone beam computed tomograms. Molars will be banded and Roth 0.22 brackets will be bonded to the canine and second premolars. Power arms, 8mmin length, will be inserted in the vertical slots of the canine brackets. The dental arches will be leveled and aligned using consecutive archwires. TADs will be inserted between the second premolars and first molars. The first premolars will then be extracted and canines will be retracted within a week. Canines will be retracted along 0.016 X 0.22 stainless steel archwires using 150 g of force applied by an elastomeric chain. The elastic chain will be replaced every 4 weeks. After 6 months of canine retraction, the orthodontic records will be collected for comparison.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcanine retraction

Canine retraction using elastomeric chains activated every 4 weeks, using power arms to direct force through the center of resistance and TADs for direct anchorage.

Sponsors

Future University in Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult orthodontic patient * Any malocclusion requiring the extraction of the first premolar and canine retraction * Full permanent dentition with the exception of the wisdom teeth.

Exclusion criteria

* Any missing permanent tooth * Previous orthodontic treatment * Periodontal disease; pregnancy * Systemic disease or medication that affects bone metabolism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Canine retractionBaseline to 6 monthsAmount of canine movement in millimeters measured on digital models. . The change in the vertical distance from the canine cusp tip to a line connecting the medial points of the third palatal rugae
Molar mesial driftBaseline to 6 monthsAmount of molar movement in millimeters measured on digital models. The change in the vertical distance from the mesiobuccal cusp tip to a line connecting the medial points of the third palatal rugae

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Canine tippingBaseline to 6 monthsThe change in the angle between the canine long axis, from cusp tip to root apex, and the palatal plane (a plane passing through the incisive foramen and the anterior and posterior nasal spines); measued on the cone beam computed tomogram.
molar rotationBaseline to 6 monthsThe change in the angle between the molar horizontal axis and frontal Plane on the cone beam computed tomogram, in the axial view.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026