Skip to content

Efficacy of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injections Patients With Concomitant Pes Anserine Bursitis

Comparison of the Efficacy of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injections Combined With Conventional Physiotherapy in Patients With Concomitant Pes Anserine Bursitis and Knee Osteoarthritis:

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04887844
Enrollment
102
Registered
2021-05-14
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2020-03-15
Last updated
2021-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis Knees Both

Keywords

Pain, Knee, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficiencies of local corticosteroid injections and local anesthetics in patients with concomitant pes anserine bursitis and osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

Several treatment options have been tried with varying success rates, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy modalities, cold application with ice-packs, and injection of local anesthetics and/or corticosteroids. Despite a relatively high frequency of this painful condition, surprisingly, few studies have evaluated treatment strategies in randomized controlled study design. To the best of our knowledge, no study in the literature made a comparison of the efficacy of local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections in addition to physiotherapy in the treatment of pes anserine bursitis yet. Thus, we aimed to compare the treatment efficacies of physiotherapy alone, physiotherapy + local anesthetic injection, and physiotherapy + local corticosteroid injection in a randomized controlled study design in patients with concomitant osteoarthritis and pes anserine bursitis.

Interventions

Lidocaine injection were applied to the most tender point in the pes anserine region by means of the soft tissue infiltration technique only once at the commencement of the treatment period. All injections were performed by the same physician.

DRUGCorticosteroid injection

Corticosteroid injection were applied to the most tender point in the pes anserine region by means of the soft tissue infiltration technique only once at the commencement of the treatment period. All injections were performed by the same physician.

OTHERConventional Physical therapy

The study participants underwent a physiotherapy program that included a one-time 15-minute cold therapy using ice packs and closed-kinetic chain quadriceps strengthening program as follows; isometric quadriceps exercise, isokinetic concentric, and eccentric quadriceps exercises with heel slides and squads. These exercises were repeated ten times a day, seven days per week, for eight weeks in total

Sponsors

Abant Izzet Baysal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participant will be evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks later by an another investigator who does not aware of groups.

Intervention model description

Group I was received physiotherapy+lidocaine injection, Group II was received physiotherapy+betamethasone dipropionate injection, and group III was only received conventional physiotherapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients having stage II-IV knee osteoarthritis along with pes anserine bursitis * Symptom onset for more than three months

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent knee operations * had an inflammatory rheumatic disease * had a history of knee trauma * had a meniscus tear * valgus/varus deformity * received injection treatment to pes anserine bursa during the preceding year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scaleeight weeksWe used paper-based VAS to evaluate the baseline severity and changes in the intensity of pain by different interventions in the entire study cohort. The visual analogue scale was devised by Hayes and Patterson and is used to document pain rating. Subjects self-report the intensity of their pain by placing a handwritten mark at one point of the length of a ten-centimeter line. The two ends of the scale line represent no pain and worst pain experienced at the zero cm and 10th cm of the scale, respectively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Indexeight weeksThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 24 items in three different domains. The index measure pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability. Pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability subscales comprise five, two, and seventeen questions, respectively. All subscales consist of 5 answer choices, which range from zero, not present, to four, very severe.
3-meter walk testeight weeksWe used 3MWT to evaluate the walking speed of the study participants. In this test, the individual is instructed to stand up while they are sitting on a chair with arm support. And then, the person is asked to walk as much distance as possible in 3 minutes without running. The walking time is measured in seconds and recorded, and the walking speed is evaluated for the corresponding age group.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026