Skip to content

Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of DFV890 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

A Randomized, Two-arm, Placebo-controlled, Participant and Investigator-blinded Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of DFV890 in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04886258
Enrollment
115
Registered
2021-05-14
Start date
2021-09-20
Completion date
2024-12-23
Last updated
2026-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Knee osteoarthritis, DFV890, Adult, NLRP3 inhibitor, Inflammasome inhibition

Brief summary

This was a double-blinded, two-arm, phase 2a study to assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of DFV890 in participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

The purpose of the Phase 2a proof of concept study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DFV890 in participants with symptomatic knee OA, and to determine the efficacy of DFV890 in reducing knee pain as evidenced by change in KOOS (knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score). The study had a screening period up to 45 days, a treatment period of 12 weeks and a 4-week follow-up period. At most, the study duration was 21 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGDFV890

DFV890 was administered orally twice per day, 10 mg during 2 weeks and 25 mg during the next 10 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching Placebo was administered orally twice per day during 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female participants \>= 50 and \<= 80 years old on the day of Informed Consent signature. * Participants must weigh at least 50 kg to participate in the study, and must have a body mass index (BMI) within the range of 18 - 35 kg/m2 at screening. BMI = Body weight (kg) / \[Height (m)\]2 * High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) \>=1.8 mg/L at screening * Symptomatic OA with pain (corresponding to Numeric Rating Scale \[NRS\] 5-9, inclusive) in the target knee for the majority of days in the last 3 months prior to screening * KOOS pain sub-scale score \<= 60 in index knee at screening and baseline * Radiographic disease: K\&L grade 2 or 3 knee osteoarthritis in the target knee, confirmed by X-ray at screening. * Active synovial inflammation at screening (defined a summary score of ≥7 with at least one region scoring 2) on contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) of the whole knee for synovitis detection from 11 sites. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Total WBC count \< 3,000/µL, absolute peripheral blood neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1,000/µL, hemoglobin \< 8.5 g/dL (85 g/L) or platelet count \< 100,000/µL at Screening * Known autoimmune disease with inflammatory arthritis (including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus), crystal-induced arthritis (gout, pseudogout associated arthritis), active acute or chronic infection or past infection of the knee joint, Lyme disease involving the knee, reactive arthritis, systemic cartilage disorders, moderate to severe fibromyalgia (widespread pain index, WPI, \>4 out of 19), or a known systemic connective tissue disease * Any known active infections, including skin or knee infections or infections that may compromise the immune system, such as HIV or chronic hepatitis B or C infection. COVID-19 specific: PCR or antigen test against COVID-19 is mandatory where required by the local Health Authority and/or by local regulation, e.g. in Germany. * Use of prohibited medications: any local i.a. treatment into the knee, including but not restricted to viscosupplementation and corticosteroids within 12 weeks prior to Day 1; long-term treatment (\>14 days) with oral corticosteroids \>5 mg/day within 4 weeks prior to Day 1; oral glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, or any nutraceutical with potential activity on cartilage repairfrom screening 1; systemic Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), selective Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX- 2) inhibitors or other non-opioid analgesics not defined as basic pain medication within 5 half-lives from PRO assessments; any other immunomodulatory drugs or treatment which cannot be discontinued or switched to a different medication within 28 days or 5 half-lives of screening (whichever is longer if required by local regulations), or until the expected PD effect has returned to baseline. * Moderate to severe pain in the contralateral knee for the majority of days in the last 3 months prior to Screening, as per patient judgment. * Severe malalignment greater than 7.5 degrees in the target knee (either varus or valgus), measured using x-ray at Screening. Additional protocol-defined inclusion /

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain SubscaleBaseline, Week 12The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the pain frequency/severity during functional activities consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no pain and 0 indicating extreme pain) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in KOOS pain score was analyzed using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Synovitis Activity Level Measured From Ktrans by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI)Baseline, Week 12Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) to visualize and quantify changes in k-trans as a marker of the activity of synovial inflammation. In dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, ktrans is a parameter that reflects how quickly contrast agent moves from blood vessels into the surrounding tissue, capturing both blood flow and vascular permeability. In synovitis, inflamed synovial tissue shows increased perfusion and leaky microvasculature, so higher k-trans values are interpreted as indicating more active synovial inflammation. Change from baseline in synovitis activity level measured from ktrans was analyzed to compare treatment groups. The model included treatment as fixed effect and baseline as continuous covariate. Ktrans is a marker of synovial inflammation in relation to vascularity permeability.
Change From Baseline in Serum High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) LevelBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12HsCRP is a protein produced by the liver in response to inflammation in the body, such as from an infection, injury, or chronic inflammatory conditions. HsCRP was used to assess the effect of DFV890 compared to placebo on systemic inflammatory status.
Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Counts (ANC)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12ANC measures the number of neutrophils, a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infection, in a blood sample. ANC was used to judge target engagement of DFV890.
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of DFV890Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8hCmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed concentration following a dose. DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) of DFV890Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8hAUClast is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (tlast). DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours (AUC0-12h) of DFV890Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8hAUC(0-12h) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 hours. To calculate AUC0-12h (corresponding to AUCtau, or AUC within a dosing interval), the concentration at 0 hours was used also as a 12 hours time point or, if not feasible, AUC0-12h was extrapolated. DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of DFV890Week 2 and Week 12: pre-doseDFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Other Symptoms SubscaleBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is other symptoms (eg., stiffness, swelling, clicking) consisting of 7 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in other symptoms score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living SubscaleBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the Function in Daily Living consisting of 17 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no impact on function in daily living and 0 indicating extreme impact on function in daily living) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in KOOS daily living function score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Sport and Recreation SubscaleBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the function in sport and recreation consisting of 5 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no impact on sport and recreation and 0 indicating extreme impact on sport and recreation) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in function in sport and recreation score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) SubscaleBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the knee-related quality of life consisting of 4 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no impact on knee-related quality of life and 0 indicating extreme impact on knee-related quality of life) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in knee related quality of life score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain SubscaleBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is pain frequency/severity during functional activities consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no pain and 0 indicating extreme pain) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in KOOS pain score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for PainBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain is a subjective assessment in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. NRS pain score ranges from 0-10 and for analyses were transformed to a 0-100 scale to be consistent with KOOS pain scores. A negative change from baseline implied improvement in pain. The NRS Pain instrument had a recall period of 24 hours and the participants were asked to rate the pain intensity at its worst. Change from baseline in NRS pain score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).

Countries

Argentina, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 32 investigative sites in 8 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening period up to 45 days.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 580 / 580 / 580 / 570 / 115
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 5819 / 5820 / 5811 / 5731 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 581 / 581 / 581 / 572 / 115

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026