Skip to content

Multigen Plus H Study and AMF TT Cones

A Prospective, Post-marketing Study Evaluating Clinical and Radiographic Early Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Multigen Plus H Alone or Involving AMF TT Cones.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04884542
Enrollment
43
Registered
2021-05-13
Start date
2022-01-19
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes of a revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Multigen Plus H and AMF TT Cones.

Interventions

DEVICERevision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total Knee Arthroplasty in case of failure of a previous operation.

Sponsors

North American Science Associates Ltd.
CollaboratorNETWORK
Limacorporate S.p.a
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female * Age ≥ 18 years old * Given written informed consent approved by the reference Ethics Committee (EC) * Subjects in whom a decision has already been made to perform a Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Multigen Plus H system as per Indication For Use. The decision to implant a Multigen Plus H system, alone or involving the AMF TT cones, must be taken prior to, and independently from, the decision to enrol the subject. This decision should be made in accordance with routine clinical practice at the study site concerned. * Subject is able to comply with the protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Age &lt; 18 years old * Subjects with any Multigen Plus system contraindication for use, or any AMF TT cones contraindication for use when used in combination with the Multigen Plus H, as reported in the current Instruction For Use. * Any clinically significant pathology based on the medical history or any medical intervention that the Investigator feels may affect the study evaluation * Female subjects who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy * Previous knee replacement on the contralateral side within the last year and whose outcome is achieving an KSS < 70 points.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Knee Society Score (KSS)Month 24Evaluation of the changes in the Functional Knee Society Score (KSS) after revision TKA

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
KOOS-ADL (Function in Daily Living subdomain)Month 24Evaluation of the functional changes in the KOOS-ADL domain after revision TKA
VAS Pain scoreMonth 24Evaluation of the changes in the VAS Pain score after revision TKA
Survivorship of the implantMonth 24Kaplan-Meier estimate
Radiographic implant evaluation and stability assessmentMonth 24Evaluation of progressive Radiolucent Lines after revision TKA
Safety evaluationIntra-operatively, Month 3, Month 12, and Month 24Incidence, type, and severity of all the Adverse Events (AEs) occurred after revision TKA

Countries

Belgium, Slovakia

Contacts

Primary ContactFrancesca Citossi
francesca.citossi@limacorporate.com+39 335 164026
Backup ContactMagalì Mafucci
magali.mafucci@limacorporate.com+39 3316082095

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026