Skip to content

The Use of AI to Improve Quality of OGD

The Use of Artificial Intelligence Real-time Feedback to Improve Compliance to a Standardised Protocol and Procedural Quality During Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04883567
Enrollment
210
Registered
2021-05-12
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2021-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acid Reflux, Anemia, Dyspepsia, Dysphagia

Keywords

oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), artificial intelligence, quality of OGD

Brief summary

Early and accurate recognition of gastrointestinal lesions has implications for public health. The quality of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) has great impact on the detection of oesophageal and gastric malignancies. An AI system, Cerebro, has been developed as a real-time recognition of a pre-defined 28 locations. This system would alert the endoscopist if the sites were not inspected with adequate time. The aim of the study is to investigate the use of AI in endoscopists-in-training during OGD to provide a real-time feedback for ensuring compliance to a standardized protocol for examination. The hypothesis is that the use of AI system Cerebro will significantly improve the compliance to the protocol and thereby reduce the blind spot rates of OGD, ensure adequate inspection time and ensure adequate photodocumentation.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTThe use of artificial intelligence system Cerebro

The artificial intelligence system Cerebro would be used during OGD

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. All patients aged \>= 18 years old 2. Undergoing diagnostic OGD for evaluation of their symptoms in the Prince of Wales Hospital will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients in which a full endoscopic examination is not required including patients with a specific diagnostic purpose without the need for a full evaluation, follow-up endoscopy within 8 weeks for a previously diagnosed disease or condition, 2. Patients' condition requiring therapeutic endoscopy, 3. Early termination of endoscopy due to patient intolerance, presence of large amount of food residue, presence of mechanical obstruction or for reasons of safety, 4. Patients with altered anatomy such as history of esophagectomy, gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgery, or Whipple's operation, 5. Patient who are not suitable for EGD examination (such as acute peritonitis with suspected perforated bowel) 6. Pregnant females 7. Patients who refuse to participate in the study 8. Patients who are unfit for consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of sites inspected during OGDDuring the procedureThere is a standardised 28 sites the trainee endoscopist need to inspect

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall inspection timeDuring the procedureThe overall inspection time during the OGD would be recorded in terms of seconds
The individual sites inspection timeDuring the procedureThe individual inspection time of the 28 sites during OGD would be recorded in terms of seconds
The number of positive pathologies found on OGDduring the procedureThe number of positive pathologies found on OGD would be recorded

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactShannon Chan
shannonchan@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk35052627
Backup ContactPhilip Chiu
philipchiu@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk35052627

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026