Skip to content

Validation of Novel BTE and SP Hearing Aid Models

Validation of 2 Novel BTE Hearing Aid Models Varying With Respect to Regular-power or Super-power Gain Specifications

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04882787
Enrollment
14
Registered
2021-05-12
Start date
2021-05-14
Completion date
2021-07-13
Last updated
2024-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Participants will wear one set of 2 different BTE hearing aid models based on the gain required by their hearing loss. The hearing aids will be programmed based on a prescriptive approach and participants will be sent out for either one home trial with the less powerful BTEs or for two home trials with the SP (super power) BTEs.

Detailed description

During this study each participant will be asked to wear a set of BTE hearing aids home and wear them daily. We will be assessing their evaluation of the BTEs during and after their home field trial. They will be asked to report on their use with different apps/accessories. Subjective performance ratings will be collected.

Interventions

DEVICEBTE hearing aid

Amplification

Sponsors

Sonova Canada Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sonova AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

2 groups based on hearing aid gain needs; one similar intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* hearing aid candidacy (N2-N7 hearing loss) * healthy outer and middle ears * ability to complete questionnaires * willingness to use smartphone * informed consent documented by a signature * willingness to wear a binaural BTE fitting * willingness to use app and accessories * willingness to adhere to COVID protocols

Exclusion criteria

* contraindications to the MD in this study: known hypersensitivity or allergy to investigational product/earmold * limited mobility/not able to attend appointments * limited ability to describe listening impressions/experiences * inability to produce a reliable hearing test result * limited dexterity - to point that participant cannot manage hearing aid insertion/removal * known psychological disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'final appointment (end of 3 weeks home trial for BTE model, end of 7 weeks home trial for SP-BTE model)Participants with 'good' response of 7 or higher on 'Total Impression' scale; Gabrielsson citation/article includes seven perceptual scales and a scale for 'Total Impression' which is described as 'an overall judgment of how good you think the reproduction is'. Possible scores from 0 to 10 with descriptors provided: 0 (min), 1 (very bad), 3 (rather bad), 5 (midway), 7 (rather good), 9 (very good), 10 (max) A higher score reflects a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Percentage of Participants Reporting No Rebootsat any time during home trial, reported at or by final appointment(end of 3 weeks home trial for BTE model, end of 7 weeks home trial for SP-BTE model)Participants to report perceived unwanted reboots of the hearing aids as an indicator of system stability (with use of 2.4 GHz connectivity including accessories and smartphones). Possible responses for perceived reboots (i.e., instances when the amplified sound dropped out and then returned) are: 'No (0) reboots perceived' or 'Reboots perceived (1 or more)'.
Number of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Boost Controlsinitial appointment (day of fitting of hearing aids)Number of SP-BTE participants reporting perceived differences from adjustment of the app's Boost controls. Stimuli were presented in a sound room to check the Clarity & Comfort Boosts in the app (available in Automatic Program). To comment on the effect of the Boosts, participants listened to simulated acoustic scenarios, initially under default settings (i.e., with no Boost), then with each Boost (Comfort then Clarity) activated separately (by pressing a button on a screen in the app). Yes/No answer to confirm a perceived difference -- 'Did you notice a difference?'
Number of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Slider Controlsinitial appointment (day of fitting of hearing aids)Number of SP-BTE participants reporting perceived differences from adjustment of two of the app's Slider controls. Stimuli were presented in a sound room to check the Enhance Speech and Reduce Noise sliders in the app (available in Manual Program). To comment on the effect of the Sliders, participants were asked to adjust the Enhance Speech and Reduce Noise Sliders (separately) to the Maximum and Minimum settings (by sliding the setting indicator across the available range). Yes/No answer to confirm a perceived difference -- 'Did you notice a difference?'

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BTE Hearing Aid Model
BTE hearing aid fitting BTE hearing aid: Amplification
7
SP-BTE Hearing Aid Model
Super power BTE hearing aid fitting BTE hearing aid: Amplification
7
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBTE Hearing Aid ModelSP-BTE Hearing Aid ModelTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Hearing aid candidate7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'

Participants with 'good' response of 7 or higher on 'Total Impression' scale; Gabrielsson citation/article includes seven perceptual scales and a scale for 'Total Impression' which is described as 'an overall judgment of how good you think the reproduction is'. Possible scores from 0 to 10 with descriptors provided: 0 (min), 1 (very bad), 3 (rather bad), 5 (midway), 7 (rather good), 9 (very good), 10 (max) A higher score reflects a better outcome.

Time frame: final appointment (end of 3 weeks home trial for BTE model, end of 7 weeks home trial for SP-BTE model)

Population: Participant (fit with hearing aids binaurally)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'Count of participants who reported score of 7 or above7 Participants
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'Count of participants who reported score of 6 or below0 Participants
SP-BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'Count of participants who reported score of 7 or above6 Participants
SP-BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'Count of participants who reported score of 6 or below1 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants Reporting No Reboots

Participants to report perceived unwanted reboots of the hearing aids as an indicator of system stability (with use of 2.4 GHz connectivity including accessories and smartphones). Possible responses for perceived reboots (i.e., instances when the amplified sound dropped out and then returned) are: 'No (0) reboots perceived' or 'Reboots perceived (1 or more)'.

Time frame: at any time during home trial, reported at or by final appointment(end of 3 weeks home trial for BTE model, end of 7 weeks home trial for SP-BTE model)

Population: Participant (wearing binaural amplification, using accessories and smartphones with 2.4 GHz connectivity)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber and Percentage of Participants Reporting No RebootsCount of participants reporting 0 reboots6 Participants
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber and Percentage of Participants Reporting No RebootsCount of participants reporting 1 or more reboots1 Participants
SP-BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber and Percentage of Participants Reporting No RebootsCount of participants reporting 0 reboots6 Participants
SP-BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber and Percentage of Participants Reporting No RebootsCount of participants reporting 1 or more reboots1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Boost Controls

Number of SP-BTE participants reporting perceived differences from adjustment of the app's Boost controls. Stimuli were presented in a sound room to check the Clarity & Comfort Boosts in the app (available in Automatic Program). To comment on the effect of the Boosts, participants listened to simulated acoustic scenarios, initially under default settings (i.e., with no Boost), then with each Boost (Comfort then Clarity) activated separately (by pressing a button on a screen in the app). Yes/No answer to confirm a perceived difference -- 'Did you notice a difference?'

Time frame: initial appointment (day of fitting of hearing aids)

Population: SP-BTE Participant (wearing binaural amplification, using smartphone app interactive controls); no data were collected for participants in the BTE hearing aid model Arm/Group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Boost ControlsCount of participants reporting a perceived difference, i.e. yes with both of the Boost controls7 Participants
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Boost ControlsCount of participants reporting no perceived difference, i.e. no with both of the Boost controls0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Slider Controls

Number of SP-BTE participants reporting perceived differences from adjustment of two of the app's Slider controls. Stimuli were presented in a sound room to check the Enhance Speech and Reduce Noise sliders in the app (available in Manual Program). To comment on the effect of the Sliders, participants were asked to adjust the Enhance Speech and Reduce Noise Sliders (separately) to the Maximum and Minimum settings (by sliding the setting indicator across the available range). Yes/No answer to confirm a perceived difference -- 'Did you notice a difference?'

Time frame: initial appointment (day of fitting of hearing aids)

Population: SP-BTE Participant (wearing binaural amplification, using smartphone app interactive controls); no data were collected for participants in the BTE hearing aid model Arm/Group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Slider ControlsCount of participants reporting a perceived difference, i.e. yes with both of the Slider controls6 Participants
BTE Hearing Aid ModelNumber of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Slider ControlsCount of participants reporting no perceived difference, i.e. no with both of the Slider controls1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026