Skip to content

Socket Shield With Immediate Implant Stability

Evaluation of Soft Tissue Stability and Labial Plate of Bone of Immediate Implant in Direct Contact Versus Gap With Socket Shield (A Randomized Clinical Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04882761
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-05-12
Start date
2017-04-12
Completion date
2021-02-24
Last updated
2021-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant

Brief summary

To evaluate socket shield technique either placing implant in direct contact to tooth fragment versus gap created between the tooth and implant.

Detailed description

Patients with a non-restorable tooth located in anterior maxillary arch was included in this study, patients were divided into two groups, eight implants per group, both groups had socket shield, group 1 will have implant in direct contact with shield, second group had a gap between dental implant and shield. soft tissue stability, bone width and implant stability was assessed preoperatively, immediate and 6 months postoperative.

Interventions

DEVICEDental implant

Comparative

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with a non-restorable tooth located in anterior maxillary arch (upper right second premolar to upper left second premolar). Tooth to be extracted is endodontically treated and free from periapical infection. 2. Systemic free patients according to modified Cornell medical index (Brodmank and Erdmann 1949). 3. Patients with good compliance.

Exclusion criteria

1. Teeth with current acute periapical infection or sinus tracts. 2. Heavy smokers and patients with bruxism habits. 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene or not willing to perform oral hygiene measures. 4. Vulnerable groups (as pregnant females and decisionally impaired individuals).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Soft tissue stability6 months postoperativelyPink esthetic score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone stability6 months postoperativelyBy Ostell

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026