Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of CAZ-AVI in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-resistant G- Pathogens in Chinese Adults

AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, MULTI-CENTER, ACTIVE-CONTROLLED STUDY TO ESTIMATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (CAZ-AVI) VERSUS BEST AVAILABLE TREATMENT (BAT) IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS DUE TO CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE PATHOGENS IN CHINESE ADULTS

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04882085
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-05-11
Start date
2021-08-26
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2024-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pyelonephritis, Bacteremia, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, Intra-abdominal Infection, Urinary Tract Infection, Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Brief summary

This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia \[HAP\] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia \[VAP\]); Complicated Urinary-Tract Infection \[cUTI\]; Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection \[cIAI\]; Bloodstream Infection \[BSI\]) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in China.This study will be an estimation study. The statistical inference will be based on point estimate and confidence interval.

Interventions

CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as a 2 hour infusion every 8 hours. Dose adjustments are available for participants with CrCL ≤50 mL/min.

main treatment expected to be used as either monotherapy or in combination are colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, amikacin, and meropenem

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female \>18 years of age * Participant must have a diagnosis of an infection (HAP/VAP, cUTI, cIAI, BSI) due to confirmed carbapenem-resistant aerobic Gram-negative pathogens, requiring administration of IV antibacterial therapy * Participant who had received appropriate prior empiric antibacterial therapy for a carbapenem-resistant pathogen must meet at least 1 of the following criteria: no or no more than 24h; worsening of objective symptoms or signs after at least 48 hours of antibacterial therapy; no change of objective symptoms or signs after at least 72 hours of antibacterial therapy. * Capable of giving signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Other medical or psychiatric condition may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study. * Participant is expected to require more than 21 days of treatment * Participants who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available treatment (BAT) * Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives preceding the first dose of study intervention used in this study (whichever is longer). * Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding. * Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score \>30 or \<10 using the most recent available data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetAt TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], complicated urinary-tract infection \[cUTI\], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia \[HAP/VAP\] or bloodstream infection \[BSI\]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis SetAt EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis SetAt EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetAt TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/ clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis SetAt TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetAt EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis SetAt EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetAt TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e. cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at end of treatment (EOT) or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetAt EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28Percentage of participants who died due to any cause up to Day 28 was reported in this outcome measure. The 95% CI was calculated using the Jeffrey's method.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsFrom start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study intervention start date and time.
Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsFrom start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)Number of participants who discontinued the study due to adverse events were reported in this outcome measure. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs included all participants with an AE record indicating that the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs included participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn but AE did not cause the participant to be discontinued from study.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology ValuesFrom first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)Potentially clinically significant hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (gram/deciliter), Hematocrit (%), Erythrocytes (10\^12/Liter \[L\]): value \< 0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and change (Chg) \> 20% decrease, value \> 1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and Chg \> 30% increase. Platelets (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 50% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Leukocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 60% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Lymphocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.25\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Neutrophils (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Basophils (10\^9/L), Eosinophils (10\^9/L), Monocytes (10\^9/L): Value \> 4.0\*ULN and Chg \> 300% increase. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any hematology parameters were reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry ValuesFrom first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)Potentially clinically significant criteria included Bilirubin(mg/dL): \>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>150% increase (inc).Aspartate Aminotransferase,Alanine Aminotransferase(Units/Liter\[U/L\]):\>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Alkaline Phosphatase(U/L):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>80% decrease (dec),\> 2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Protein,Albumin(g/dL):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>50% dec,\>1.5\*ULN and Chg \>50% inc.Blood Urea Nitrogen(mg/dL):\<0.2\*LLN and Chg \>100% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Creatinine(mg/dL):\>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Sodium(milliequivalent\[mEq\]/L):\<0.85\*LLN and Chg \>10% dec, \>1.1\*ULN and Chg \>10% inc.Potassium,Chloride(mEq/L):\<0.8\*LLN and Chg \>20% dec, \>1.2\*ULN and Chg \>20% inc.Calcium(mg/dL):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>30% dec,\> 1.3\*ULN and Chg \>30% inc.Bicarbonate(mEq/L):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>1.3\*ULN and Chg \>40% inc.Glucose(mg/dL):\<0.6\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any clinical chemistry parameters were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetAt TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 64 participants were screened of which 3 participants failed screening and 1 participant was not randomized in the study. A total of 60 participants were enrolled and randomized in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
30
Best Available Treatment
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
29
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath69
Overall StudyRandomized not treated10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBest Available TreatmentTotalCeftazidime-Avibactam
Age, Customized
18-44 years
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
45-64 years
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than equal to (>=) 65 years
19 Participants40 Participants21 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants17 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants42 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 309 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 3018 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 3011 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set

Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], complicated urinary-tract infection \[cUTI\], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia \[HAP/VAP\] or bloodstream infection \[BSI\]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)

Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from mMITT analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set59.3 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set25.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events

Number of participants who discontinued the study due to adverse events were reported in this outcome measure. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs included all participants with an AE record indicating that the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs included participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn but AE did not cause the participant to be discontinued from study.

Time frame: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamNumber of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinuations from study due to TEAEs0 Participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamNumber of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsPermanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs1 Participants
Best Available TreatmentNumber of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinuations from study due to TEAEs0 Participants
Best Available TreatmentNumber of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsPermanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values

Potentially clinically significant criteria included Bilirubin(mg/dL): \>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>150% increase (inc).Aspartate Aminotransferase,Alanine Aminotransferase(Units/Liter\[U/L\]):\>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Alkaline Phosphatase(U/L):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>80% decrease (dec),\> 2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Protein,Albumin(g/dL):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>50% dec,\>1.5\*ULN and Chg \>50% inc.Blood Urea Nitrogen(mg/dL):\<0.2\*LLN and Chg \>100% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Creatinine(mg/dL):\>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Sodium(milliequivalent\[mEq\]/L):\<0.85\*LLN and Chg \>10% dec, \>1.1\*ULN and Chg \>10% inc.Potassium,Chloride(mEq/L):\<0.8\*LLN and Chg \>20% dec, \>1.2\*ULN and Chg \>20% inc.Calcium(mg/dL):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>30% dec,\> 1.3\*ULN and Chg \>30% inc.Bicarbonate(mEq/L):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>1.3\*ULN and Chg \>40% inc.Glucose(mg/dL):\<0.6\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any clinical chemistry parameters were reported.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values4 Participants
Best Available TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values

Potentially clinically significant hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (gram/deciliter), Hematocrit (%), Erythrocytes (10\^12/Liter \[L\]): value \< 0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and change (Chg) \> 20% decrease, value \> 1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and Chg \> 30% increase. Platelets (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 50% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Leukocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 60% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Lymphocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.25\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Neutrophils (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Basophils (10\^9/L), Eosinophils (10\^9/L), Monocytes (10\^9/L): Value \> 4.0\*ULN and Chg \> 300% increase. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any hematology parameters were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values7 Participants
Best Available TreatmentNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study intervention start date and time.

Time frame: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events24 Participants
Best Available TreatmentNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events26 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28

Percentage of participants who died due to any cause up to Day 28 was reported in this outcome measure. The 95% CI was calculated using the Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least one dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 2813.3 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 2813.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set

Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)

Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set66.7 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set29.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set

Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.

Time frame: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)

Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set78.6 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set31.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set

Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e. cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at end of treatment (EOT) or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.

Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)

Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set78.6 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set26.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set

Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.

Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)

Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set78.6 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set42.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set

Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)

Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set81.5 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set33.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set

Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.

Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)

Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set71.4 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set31.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set

Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/ clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)

Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set59.3 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set25.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set

Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)

Population: mMITT analysis set: all participants who met minimum disease requirements, received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens were excluded. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. 'Number Analyzed' =number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetStaphylococcus Capitis Subspecies100.0 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetEscherichia Coli100.0 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetKlebsiella Pneumoniae89.5 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetPseudomonas Aeruginosa75.0 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetStaphylococcus Aureus0 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetPseudomonas Aeruginosa0 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetKlebsiella Pneumoniae39.1 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis SetEnterococcus Faecium0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set

Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)

Population: mMITT analysis set: all participants who met minimum disease requirements, received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens were excluded. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. 'Number Analyzed' =number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetStaphylococcus Capitis Subspecies100.0 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetEscherichia Coli100.0 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetKlebsiella Pneumoniae63.2 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetPseudomonas Aeruginosa37.5 Percentage of participants
Ceftazidime-AvibactamPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetStaphylococcus Aureus0 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetPseudomonas Aeruginosa0 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetKlebsiella Pneumoniae30.4 Percentage of participants
Best Available TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis SetEnterococcus Faecium0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026