Acute Pyelonephritis, Bacteremia, Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, Intra-abdominal Infection, Urinary Tract Infection, Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Conditions
Brief summary
This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia \[HAP\] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia \[VAP\]); Complicated Urinary-Tract Infection \[cUTI\]; Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection \[cIAI\]; Bloodstream Infection \[BSI\]) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in China.This study will be an estimation study. The statistical inference will be based on point estimate and confidence interval.
Interventions
CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as a 2 hour infusion every 8 hours. Dose adjustments are available for participants with CrCL ≤50 mL/min.
main treatment expected to be used as either monotherapy or in combination are colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, amikacin, and meropenem
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female \>18 years of age * Participant must have a diagnosis of an infection (HAP/VAP, cUTI, cIAI, BSI) due to confirmed carbapenem-resistant aerobic Gram-negative pathogens, requiring administration of IV antibacterial therapy * Participant who had received appropriate prior empiric antibacterial therapy for a carbapenem-resistant pathogen must meet at least 1 of the following criteria: no or no more than 24h; worsening of objective symptoms or signs after at least 48 hours of antibacterial therapy; no change of objective symptoms or signs after at least 72 hours of antibacterial therapy. * Capable of giving signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Other medical or psychiatric condition may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study. * Participant is expected to require more than 21 days of treatment * Participants who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available treatment (BAT) * Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives preceding the first dose of study intervention used in this study (whichever is longer). * Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding. * Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score \>30 or \<10 using the most recent available data.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set | At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24) | Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], complicated urinary-tract infection \[cUTI\], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia \[HAP/VAP\] or bloodstream infection \[BSI\]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set | At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14) | Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set | At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14) | Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24) | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/ clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set | At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24) | Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14) | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set | At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14) | Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set | At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24) | Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e. cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at end of treatment (EOT) or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14) | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28 | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants who died due to any cause up to Day 28 was reported in this outcome measure. The 95% CI was calculated using the Jeffrey's method. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study intervention start date and time. |
| Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days) | Number of participants who discontinued the study due to adverse events were reported in this outcome measure. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs included all participants with an AE record indicating that the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs included participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn but AE did not cause the participant to be discontinued from study. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24) | Potentially clinically significant hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (gram/deciliter), Hematocrit (%), Erythrocytes (10\^12/Liter \[L\]): value \< 0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and change (Chg) \> 20% decrease, value \> 1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and Chg \> 30% increase. Platelets (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 50% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Leukocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 60% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Lymphocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.25\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Neutrophils (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Basophils (10\^9/L), Eosinophils (10\^9/L), Monocytes (10\^9/L): Value \> 4.0\*ULN and Chg \> 300% increase. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any hematology parameters were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values | From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24) | Potentially clinically significant criteria included Bilirubin(mg/dL): \>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>150% increase (inc).Aspartate Aminotransferase,Alanine Aminotransferase(Units/Liter\[U/L\]):\>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Alkaline Phosphatase(U/L):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>80% decrease (dec),\> 2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Protein,Albumin(g/dL):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>50% dec,\>1.5\*ULN and Chg \>50% inc.Blood Urea Nitrogen(mg/dL):\<0.2\*LLN and Chg \>100% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Creatinine(mg/dL):\>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Sodium(milliequivalent\[mEq\]/L):\<0.85\*LLN and Chg \>10% dec, \>1.1\*ULN and Chg \>10% inc.Potassium,Chloride(mEq/L):\<0.8\*LLN and Chg \>20% dec, \>1.2\*ULN and Chg \>20% inc.Calcium(mg/dL):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>30% dec,\> 1.3\*ULN and Chg \>30% inc.Bicarbonate(mEq/L):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>1.3\*ULN and Chg \>40% inc.Glucose(mg/dL):\<0.6\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any clinical chemistry parameters were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24) | Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 64 participants were screened of which 3 participants failed screening and 1 participant was not randomized in the study. A total of 60 participants were enrolled and randomized in the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days. | 30 |
| Best Available Treatment Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days. | 29 |
| Total | 59 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 6 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Randomized not treated | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Best Available Treatment | Total | Ceftazidime-Avibactam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 18-44 years | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Customized 45-64 years | 8 Participants | 16 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Age, Customized Greater than equal to (>=) 65 years | 19 Participants | 40 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | 17 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants | 42 Participants | 22 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 6 / 30 | 9 / 29 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 17 / 30 | 18 / 29 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 30 | 11 / 29 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], complicated urinary-tract infection \[cUTI\], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia \[HAP/VAP\] or bloodstream infection \[BSI\]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from mMITT analysis set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set | 59.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set | 25.9 Percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Number of participants who discontinued the study due to adverse events were reported in this outcome measure. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs included all participants with an AE record indicating that the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs included participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn but AE did not cause the participant to be discontinued from study.
Time frame: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs | 0 Participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs | 1 Participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs | 0 Participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values
Potentially clinically significant criteria included Bilirubin(mg/dL): \>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>150% increase (inc).Aspartate Aminotransferase,Alanine Aminotransferase(Units/Liter\[U/L\]):\>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Alkaline Phosphatase(U/L):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>80% decrease (dec),\> 2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Protein,Albumin(g/dL):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>50% dec,\>1.5\*ULN and Chg \>50% inc.Blood Urea Nitrogen(mg/dL):\<0.2\*LLN and Chg \>100% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Creatinine(mg/dL):\>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Sodium(milliequivalent\[mEq\]/L):\<0.85\*LLN and Chg \>10% dec, \>1.1\*ULN and Chg \>10% inc.Potassium,Chloride(mEq/L):\<0.8\*LLN and Chg \>20% dec, \>1.2\*ULN and Chg \>20% inc.Calcium(mg/dL):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>30% dec,\> 1.3\*ULN and Chg \>30% inc.Bicarbonate(mEq/L):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>1.3\*ULN and Chg \>40% inc.Glucose(mg/dL):\<0.6\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any clinical chemistry parameters were reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values | 4 Participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values | 7 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values
Potentially clinically significant hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (gram/deciliter), Hematocrit (%), Erythrocytes (10\^12/Liter \[L\]): value \< 0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and change (Chg) \> 20% decrease, value \> 1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and Chg \> 30% increase. Platelets (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 50% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Leukocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 60% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Lymphocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.25\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Neutrophils (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Basophils (10\^9/L), Eosinophils (10\^9/L), Monocytes (10\^9/L): Value \> 4.0\*ULN and Chg \> 300% increase. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any hematology parameters were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values | 7 Participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values | 13 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study intervention start date and time.
Time frame: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 24 Participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 26 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause up to Day 28 was reported in this outcome measure. The 95% CI was calculated using the Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least one dose of study intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28 | 13.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28 | 13.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set | 29.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Time frame: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set | 31.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e. cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at end of treatment (EOT) or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set | 26.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set | 42.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | 81.5 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set | 71.4 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set | 31.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/ clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | 59.3 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | 25.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)
Population: mMITT analysis set: all participants who met minimum disease requirements, received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens were excluded. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. 'Number Analyzed' =number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Staphylococcus Capitis Subspecies | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Escherichia Coli | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Klebsiella Pneumoniae | 89.5 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Pseudomonas Aeruginosa | 75.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Staphylococcus Aureus | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Pseudomonas Aeruginosa | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Klebsiella Pneumoniae | 39.1 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Enterococcus Faecium | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Time frame: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
Population: mMITT analysis set: all participants who met minimum disease requirements, received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens were excluded. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. 'Number Analyzed' =number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Staphylococcus Capitis Subspecies | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Escherichia Coli | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Klebsiella Pneumoniae | 63.2 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Pseudomonas Aeruginosa | 37.5 Percentage of participants |
| Ceftazidime-Avibactam | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Staphylococcus Aureus | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Pseudomonas Aeruginosa | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Klebsiella Pneumoniae | 30.4 Percentage of participants |
| Best Available Treatment | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set | Enterococcus Faecium | 0 Percentage of participants |