Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy of Double Dose Oral Terbinafine Vs Itraconazole in Treatment of Dermatophyte Infections of Skin.

Comparison of Efficacy of Double Dose Oral Terbinafine Versus Itraconazole in Treatment of Dermatophyte Infections of Skin - A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04880980
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-05-11
Start date
2021-03-15
Completion date
2022-03-15
Last updated
2022-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dermatophyte Infection, Terbinafine Adverse Reaction, Itraconazole Adverse Reaction

Keywords

double dose, oral terbinafine, oral itraconazole, dermatophyte skin infection, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Study would be conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of double than usual dose oral terbinafine versus itraconazole in treatment of dermatophyte infections of skin in patient presenting at dermatology department of Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Detailed description

* Study would be a randomized controlled trial, in which 120 subjects would be randomly divided into two equal groups of 60 each. * Each group would be prescribed double than usual dose of terbinafine(250 mg twice daily) or itraconazole(100mg twice daily) for 2 weeks initially. Treatment may be extended to 4 weeks if cure has not been achieved. Patients will be diagnosed and followed on the basis of classical clinical features of dermatophyte infections and microscopic potassium hydro-oxide slide preparation for fungal hyphae and spores. Liver function tests will be checked on day 0, 14 and 28. Individuals aged 15-50 years with one or no co-morbidity will be included in the study. Study will be conducted over a period of 6-8 months.

Interventions

DRUGTerbinafine Pill

Double than usual dose of oral terbinafine pills will be used for treatment purpose in one group.

Double than usual dose of oral itraconazole capsules will be used for treatment purpose in second group.

Sponsors

Pak Emirates Military Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be randomly assigned to group one or two.

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* individuals with dermatophyte skin infection, aged 15-50 years with one or no co-morbidities.

Exclusion criteria

* individuals with two or more co-morbidities or known cases of chronic liver disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients cured by using double dose of oral terbinafine Vs itraconazole in the treatment of resistant dermatophyte skin infections as assessed by measuring pruritis, erythema and scaling .2-4 weeksClassical clinical features of dermatophyte skin infections (pruritis, erythema and scaling, all will be graded on a scale 0-3 i. e 0=none to 3=severe) would be noted at start of treatment after 2 weeks and then if required after 4 weeks of treatment.
Adverse effects including effects on liver function tests of double dose oral terbinafine Vs itraconazole in the treatment of resistant dermatophyte skin infections.2-4 weeksObjective Assessment of adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, jaundice) as well as laboratory evaluation of liver function tests (Bilirubin umol/L, ALT U/L, ALP U/L) would be performed at start of treatment after 2 weeks and if required than after 4 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of treatment required to achieve cure from resistant dermatophyte infections.2-4 weeksTreatment response in form of clinical features (changes in erythema. Pruritis and scaling) and KOH fungal slide smear testing would be done after 2 weeks of treatment and if required than after 4 weeks.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026