Skip to content

BL3000 Compared to Pantogar® in the Treatment of Telogen Effluvium in Women.

Study Phase III, Randomized, Double-dummy, Placebo Controlled, Single-center, of Regarding the Non-inferiority of the Medication BL3000, When Compared to Pantogar® Treatment of Telogen Effluvium in Women.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04880889
Enrollment
326
Registered
2021-05-11
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2023-07-30
Last updated
2022-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Telogen Effluvium

Keywords

loss of hair

Brief summary

Study phase III, randomized, double-dummy, placebo controlled, single-center, of regarding the non-inferiority of the medication BL3000, when compared to Pantogar® treatment of telogen effluvium in women. Research product: BL3000. Reference product: Pantogar® List of Study Center: MAIN INVESTIGATOR STUDY CENTER FONE Medcin Skin Institute Sérgio Schalka 11 36835357

Detailed description

Study phase III, randomized, double-dummy, placebo controlled, single-center, of regarding the non-inferiority of the medication BL3000, when compared to Pantogar® treatment of telogen effluvium in women. 326 female patients will be recruited for the study. They will be aged from 18 to 45 years old, not menopausal, diagnosed with telogen effluvium proven by Trichoscan, who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet the exclusion criteria and who sign the Informed Consent Form. Patients will be divided into two treatment groups according to randomization: Group I: 163 patients will receive treatment with the medication BL3000 and matching placebo of pantogar. Group II: 163 patients will receive treatment with the reference drug (Pantogar®) and matching placebo of BL3000. The patients will participate in the study for a period of 199 (one hundred and ninety-nine) days, using of the investigational or comparative product for 180 (one hundred and eighty) days,

Interventions

DRUGBL 3000

capsule 500 mg

DRUGReference Pantogar

capsule

DRUGBL3000 Placebo

capsule 500 mg

DRUGPantogar - Placebo

capsule

Sponsors

Biolab Sanus Farmaceutica
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-dummy

Intervention model description

Study phase III, randomized, double-dummy, placebo controlled, single-center, of regarding the non-inferiority of the medication BL3000, when compared to Pantogar® treatment of telogen effluvium in women.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female patients aged from 18 to 45 years old; 2. Clinical/trichological evidence of telogen effluvium, assessed using the Telogen Index. 3. Participants will be eligible if they have a rate strand of hair ≥ 20% of the total quantified by Thrichoscan measurement in the central-parietal region; 3. Complaint of hair loss for at least 3 months prior to screening; 4. Agreement to obey the procedures and requirements of the protocol and to attend the Research Institution on the day (s) and time (s) determined for the evaluations; 5. Signature of the Informed Consent Form; SAW. Agreement to use an acceptable non-hormonal contraceptive method throughout the period of treatment and up to 60 days after the end of the study; 6. Serum creatinine within the normal range; 7. Relationship between AST / ALT transaminases ≤ 2.5x the upper limit of normal

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or pregnancy risk; 2. Lactation; 3. Childbirth occurred in the last 12 months; 4. Patient who has undergone surgical procedures or has suffered trauma in the last 6 months; 5. History of bleeding events in the last 6 months, SAW. Clinical evidence of female androgenic alopecia or alopecia areata; 6. Patients with signs of menopause: menstrual irregularities or cycle failure, signs of climacteric; 7. Laboratory evidence of thyroid diseases (variation in TSH and / or free T4 values outside normal limits); 8. Clinical evidence of ovarian or adrenal endocrine disorders (polycystic ovaries, hirsutism, menstrual irregularities); 9. History or presence of systemic autoimmune disease; 10. Start or end of hormone therapy within 6 months before randomization; 11. Deficiency diseases; 12. Introduction, change or interruption of a hormonal contraceptive method in the last 6 months before randomization; 13. Introduction of a restrictive diet in the last 03 months before randomization; 14. Use of any continuous medication; 15. Diabetes, chronic consuming disease, malabsorptive syndrome or diseases of the gastrointestinal tract; 16. Infectious or chronic fever; 17. Psychiatric/psychological illnesses, such as depression, anxiety or obsessive disorders; 18. Clinical and / or laboratory evidence of anemia or ferropenia; (Hb \<12 g / dL and Ferritin \<40 g / L); 19. Hair treatment to control hair loss (including shampoo, conditioner, lotions); 20. Hair growth agent treatment within 3 months before randomization; 21. Concomitant use of drugs that cause hair loss; 22. Patient with a history of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any formulation ingredients; 23. Other conditions considered by the evaluating physician to be reasonable for disqualifying the participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate difference of anagen hairs at 180 days (FA vf [%]) from baseline rate (FA vi [%]), in participants of each treatment group.180 daysAssess the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of the BL3000 drug compared to the drug. The counting of anagen and telogen performed by phototrichogram in the initial and final experimental times, with the calculation proposed according to the protocol below: The primary variable of efficacy will be the rate of anagen hairs (FA) (%), 45.90 and 180 days in relation to the beginning, between the two arms of treatment (test versus control). Calculated as follows: FA (vi): result of anagen (%) on visit 04 (T0); FA (vf): result of anagen (%) on visit 10 (T182). Response rate of anagen (%), FA = (FA (vf)-FA (vi)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of the number of anagen hairs per mm² (density) at the experimental time frames, compared to the baseline evaluation, in participants of each treatment group.45,90 and 180 daysDifference of the density of anagen hairs, in a given area (units per mm2), measured by phototrichogram in the experimental times, compared to the baseline measurement
Difference of the number of telogen hairs per mm² (density) at the experimental time frames, compared to the baseline evaluation, in participants of each treatment group.45,90 and 180 daysDifference of the density of telogen hairs, in a given area (units per mm2), measured by phototrichogram in the experimental times, compared to the baseline measurement
Difference of the anagen/telogen hair ratio at the experimental times frames, compared to the baseline evaluation, in participants of each treatment group.45,90 and 180 daysDifference of the anagen/telogen hair ratio, in a given area (units per mm2), measured by phototrichogram in the experimental times, compared to the baseline measurement
Difference of the total count of strand hair per mm² (density) at the experimental time frames, compared to the baseline evaluation, in participants of each treatment group.45,90 and 180 daysDifference of the density of the strand hair, in a given area (units per mm2), measured by phototrichogram in the experimental times, compared to the baseline measurement
Proportion of Excellent and Very good change of the telogen effluvium, as assessed by the investigator, comparing photographs taken at final visit and baseline visit, in participants of each treatment group.180 daysAnalysis photographs taken during the initial and final visits, the opinion of the evaluator, regarding the improvement of the telogen effluvium: 1. \- Excellent; 2. \- Very good; 3. \- Good; 4. \- Regular 5. \- Bad. Analysis global assessment of the investigator, the X2 test will be used to make comparisons between groups. The proportion of Excellent and Very good for Researcher question will be analyzed, the confidence interval with 95% confidence for p1 - p2 will be constructed from the sample distribution of the sample proportion, where p2 is the proportion of Excellent and Very good by Pantogar for Researcher question and p1 is that of the test drug.
Proportion of Much better and best change, based on the participant's subjective assessment, from each treatment group, using a Likert scale.45,90 and 180 daysParticipants will present their opinion on the effectiveness of the treatment, using a Likert scale from 1 to 4: Considering the evolution of the treatment, what is your opinion about the amount of hair strands at the end of the treatment. 1 - Much better; 2 - Best; 3 - No change and 4 - Worse. To analyze Subjective evaluation of the patient, the X2 test will be used to make comparisons between groups. The proportion of Much better and Best for patient question will be analyzed, the confidence interval with 95% confidence for p1 - p2 will be constructed from the sample distribution of the sample proportion, where p2 is the proportion of Very best and Best of Pantogar for patient question and p1 is that of the test drug.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events in each treatment group180 daysSafety and tolerability evaluation based on the occurrence of adverse events in each treatment group.
Difference of the strand hair thickness (mm²) at the experimental time frames, compared to the baseline evaluation, in participants of each treatment group.45,90 and 180 daysDifference of the thickness of strand hairs, measured by phototrichogram in the experimental times, compared to the baseline measurement

Contacts

Primary ContactSérgio Schalka, I
sergio.schalka@medcin.com.br55 - 11 3683-5366
Backup ContactEgle Oppi
ecosta@biolabfarma.com.br55 11 3573-6321

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026