Skip to content

Prehospital Transfusion Strategy in Bleeding Patients

Prehospital Plasma or Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Major Bleeding; PRIEST Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04879485
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-05-10
Start date
2021-05-03
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Component Transfusion, Hemorrhage

Brief summary

The aim of study is to compare clinical and biochemical effect of three different transfusion strategies among patients with major hemorrhage requiring prehospital transfusion. A) Present prehospital standard treatment including a mixture of plasma and Red blood cell transfusion (RBC) transfusion B) Red blood cell transfusion (RBC) only C) Plasma transfusion only Hypothesis: 1. Transfusion strategy including a mixture of RBC and plasma is superior as compared with only plasma or only RBC strategy in terms of initial treatment of circulatory shock (expressed as base deficit). 2. Endothelial function and ability of clot formation is preserved to a greater extent in patients receiving plasma.

Detailed description

Rationale for the study: The warranted clinical question to be unsolved is whether initial pre-hospital transfusion in bleeding patients should base on a strategy including plasma, RBC or combination of both. Despite possible benefits, allogenic blood product are associated with side effects and pose significant logistic challenges in the prehospital environment. So far, a majority of the present knowledge is based on retrospective evaluations or clinical trials without relevant control groups.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBlood products

Compare two different transfusion strategies against standard transfusion regimen

Sponsors

Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Odense University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Major bleeding requiring prehospital transfusion

Exclusion criteria

* Transfusion with blood products already initiated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Base deficitAt hospital arrival (with in 1 hour)Arterial-gas analysis upon arrival with parameter base deficit as primary outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT)At hospital arrival (with in 2 hours)Plasma sample analysed; APTT
Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)At hospital arrival (with in 2 hours)Plasma sample analysed; thrombin generation assay
International Normalized Ratio (INR)At hospital arrival (with in 2 hours)Plasma sample analysed; INR
30 days mortalitymortality within 30 daysMortality, follow up in patient records
In hospital red blood cell transfusion requirementsWithin in the first 24 hours after hospital arrivalAmount of red blood cells transfused as registered in patient electronic records
In hospital plasma transfusion requirementsWithin in the first 24 hours after hospital arrivalAmount of plasma transfused as registered in patient electronic records
In hospital platelet transfusion requirementsWithin in the first 24 hours after hospital arrivalAmount of platelet transfused as registered in patient electronic records
Endothelium markersAt hospital arrival (with in 2 hours)Plasma sample analysed; Syndecan-1

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026