Spinal Cord Injuries
Conditions
Keywords
Spinal Cord Injury, Exoskeleton, Robotics, Gait, Rehabilitation, Lower-limb, Neurorehabilitation, Paraplegia, Walking, Assistive technology, Usability, Safety, Feasibility, Multicenter
Brief summary
The loss of the ability to walk and the associated restriction of mobility presents a major challenge to people with spinal cord injury in an everyday environment designed for pedestrians. Exoskeletal technology has the potential to help people with impaired leg function to regain ambulation and thus improve their independence. This technology is not completely new, but due to their high access price (\ 120k€/unit), high size and weight (\ 25 kg), and need for trained physiotherapist supervision, commercially available exoskeletons are only found in large hospitals and only in very few cases get into patients' homes. The company ABLE Human Motion S.L. (Barcelona, Spain) has developed a novel exoskeleton to overcome these disadvantages, which is more compact, lighter (9 kg) and easier to use. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the safety, feasibility and usability of the ABLE exoskeleton device in people with spinal cord injury during a four to six weeks gait training in clinical settings. Furthermore, potential effects of the training on walking, general health status, user satisfaction, and quality of life will be assessed.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety, feasibility, and usability of using the ABLE Exoskeleton for patients with SCI in a hospital setting during a 4-6 week training programme. The secondary objectives are as follows: * Assess the impact of ABLE Exoskeleton training on gait and function. * Assess the effect on the perceived rate of exertion for patients using the ABLE Exoskeleton. * Assess the level of user satisfaction from participants and therapists of the ABLE Exoskeleton. * Assess the psychosocial impact of the ABLE Exoskeleton for participants Patients who match inclusion and exclusion criteria and pass pre-study screening will be enrolled in the study. Following the screening, baseline assessments will be conducted without the device. Participants will undergo a training programme with the ABLE Exoskeleton three times a week for four weeks for a total of 12 sessions. Standardized clinical assessments with the device will be performed during the first and the last training sessions. During the training period, several safety and usability measurements will be taken. After the last training session, baseline assessments without the exoskeleton will be repeated during a post-study assessment. Four weeks after the final training session a follow-up assessment will be conducted with participants. At the end of the study, the participating therapists will be asked to fill out a satisfaction questionnaire. This is the first study investigating the use of the ABLE Exoskeleton, therefore the primary hypothesis of this study is that the ABLE Exoskeleton is safe, feasible, and usable for the intended patient population with SCI in a hospital setting. The secondary hypothesis is that the device will have a positive impact on the perceived rate of exertion, mobility, and psychosocial health of the study participants with SCI.
Interventions
DEVICEABLE Exoskeleton
Participants with SCI will undergo a training programme with the ABLE Exoskeleton device three times a week for four to six weeks for a total of 12 sessions.
Sponsors
Institut Guttmann
Heidelberg University Hospital Spinal Cord Injury Center
ABLE Human Motion S.L.
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 18 to 70 years of age * Traumatic and non-traumatic SCI * Currently receiving treatment as an inpatient or outpatient at one of the investigational sites * AIS A to AIS D with sufficient arm strength to support body weight on a walking frame * Ability to give informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* WISCI II without exoskeleton of \>16 * 5 or more risk factors for fragility as stated by Craven et al (29) * History of lower limb fragility fractures in the last 2 years * Deterioration \> 3 points of the total International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) motor score within the last 4 weeks * Spinal instability * Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) \> 3 in lower limbs * Unable to tolerate 30 min standing without clinical symptoms of orthostatic hypotension * Unable to perform a sit-to-stand transfer or stand in the device with assistance * Psychological or cognitive issues that do not allow a participant to follow the study procedures * Any neurological condition other than SCI * Medically unstable * Severe comorbidities including any condition that a physician considers to not be appropriate to complete participation in the study * Ongoing skin issues * Height, width, weight or other anatomical constraints (such as leg length differences) incompatible with the device * Insufficient Range of Motion (ROM) for ABLE Exoskeleton device * Known pregnancy or breastfeeding
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | Up to 10 weeks | To assess safety, the number of Severe Adverse Events (SAE), Adverse Events (AE) and drop-outs due to the device will be assessed and reported. |
| Time and Level of Assistance (LoA) to don/doff the device | Up to 8 weeks | Level of Assistance (LoA) and time taken to don/doff the device will be measured in every session. LoA will be measured using a 6 item scale, from Total assistance to Independence. Different assistance levels are defined taking into account the degree of participation of both the patient and the therapist on performing the activity. This outcome measure will be used to assess the device's usability. |
| Level of Assistance (LoA) to complete therapy activity tasks | Up to 8 weeks | Four therapy activity tasks will be attempted every session by the participant. The therapist will record the LoA required to complete each task during the session. The tasks are the following: sit-to-stand, walk 10 meters, turn 180 degrees, and stand-to-sit. Different assistance levels are defined taking into account the degree of participation of both the patient and the therapist in performing the activity. This outcome measure will be used to assess the device's usability. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Timed up and go test (TUG) | Up to 7 weeks | Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) measures the time it takes a person to get up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around and sit down again. It is a widely used test to assess balance and the risk of falls in different patient groups. |
| Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II) | Up to 7 weeks | WISCI II assesses the extent and nature of assistance for walking 10 meters in persons with SCI. Assistance is specified as different combinations of braces, walking aids and physical assistance. The WISCI II consists of 20 levels from unable to walk to the ability to walk 10 meters without any assistance. |
| BORG Scale | Up to 7 weeks | Measurement of the percieved rate of exertion. The BORG scale measures the subjective level of intensity in physical work on a 15-grade scale. |
| Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) | Up to 10 weeks | Used to measure user satisfaction from participants and therapists. QUEST 2.0 is designed to measure the level of satisfaction and the value people attribute to assistive technologies. |
| Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) | Up to 10 weeks | The PIADS is a 26-item (7-point Likert-Scale), self-report questionnaire designed to assess the effects of an assistive device on functional independence, well-being, and quality of life. |
| Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) | Up to 10 weeks | SCIM III scale focuses on the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons with SCI. The SCIM III consists of three subscales: Self-Care, Respiratory and Sphincter Management, Mobility (room and toilet) and Mobility (indoors and outdoors, on even surface). A total score of 0 (totally dependent) to 100 (totally independent) points can be achieved. |
| 6-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) | Up to 7 weeks | 6 Minute Walk Test (6 MWT) measures the distance a person can walk in 6 minutes. There are different possibilities for performing this test. For this study, we will use a track of 50 meters, where patients walk back and forth. |
| 10-Meter Walking Test (10 MWT) | Up to 7 weeks | The 10MWT will be performed using the first 10 meters of the 6-minute walking test. |
Countries
Germany, Spain
Outcome results
None listed