Skip to content

Premium Trifocal IOL Comparative Analysis

Development of a Database (Register) for Quality Assurance and Optimization of the Postoperative Results of Premium Intraocular Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04875455
Enrollment
133
Registered
2021-05-06
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2021-11-17
Last updated
2022-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Lens Opacities, Presbyopia

Keywords

Intraocular lens, Trifocal

Brief summary

Short and long-term analysis of the refraction correction and optical image quality of modern premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) with the establishment of a database for quality assurance and optimization the computation constants of the lens power.

Detailed description

Since the investigational lens, like conventional IOLs, is a posterior chamber lens which is widely implanted following cataract extraction, phacoemulsification is adopted. To assess the binocular vision, the investigational lens will be mono- or bilaterally implanted. Clinically retro- and prospective, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open study at several centers: University Eye Clinic Heidelberg (leading center), Practice Center Ahaus in the Eye Clinic Ahaus, Breyer, Kaymak & Klabe Eye Surgery in Düsseldorf, nordBLICK Eye Center Kiel. Main objectives: 1. Functional results (refraction and visual acuity results) Secondary goals: 2. Deviation target vs. achieved postoperative refraction (for constant optimization of the IOL calculation) 3. Subjective patient satisfaction 4. Visual quality (e.g. scattered light, contrast vision, spherical aberrations) 5. Stability of the results achieved postoperatively

Interventions

DEVICEPOD F GF (BVI Medical), POD F (BVI Medical), Panoptix (Alcon Inc) IOL implantation

In this study, patients have already received treatment, after receiving the consent, the routinely collected pre-, intra- and postoperative data will be pseudonymized and evaluated.

Sponsors

Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Study procedure guidelines Patients who were previously treated with a premium IOL (Panoptix, POD FGF, POD F) are continuously included: Retrospective: Routine data collected up to the first study visit (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative) are evaluated retrospectively Prospective: 2-4 months postoperatively: refraction and vision, slit lamp and fundus examination, intraocular

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures * Bilateral implantation of one of the following IOL models * Alcon PanOptix (TFNT00) * PhysIOL FineVision (POD F) * PhysIOL FineVision (POD F GF) * Uneventful cataract surgery with first clinical outcomes in the expected range * Patient included in Premium IOL study protocol by signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age of patient \<45 years * Irregular astigmatism * Postoperative manifested astigmatism of \>1.0 D * Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition) * Clinically significant glaucoma * Clinically significant macular degeneration, clinically significant macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy * Patients with keratoconus or keratectasia * Any ocular comorbidity having a significant effect on the postoperative clinical outcomes * History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures * Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic Uveitis, Marfan's syndrome) * Pupil abnormalitis (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils or pupils that do not dilate under mesopic/scotopic conditions) * AMD * Intraoperative complications like capsular rupture etc. * Patients who do not give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monocular Best corrected distance visual acuity (5 m)Postoperative Day 75-105 (3 months)CDVA measured with ETDRS charts placed in 5m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2014.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026