Skip to content

Frequency and Intensity of Local Reactions in Patients Treated With 4% 5-FU vs 4% 5-FU Associated With an Emollient Cream: a Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial

Frequency and Intensity of Local Reactions in Patients Treated With 4% 5-FU vs 4% 5-FU Associated With an Emollient Cream: a Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04875026
Enrollment
146
Registered
2021-05-06
Start date
2021-02-16
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2022-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratoses

Brief summary

Transient local skin reactions with topical Actinic Keratosis treatments such as 5-FluoroUracil (5-FU) often lead to non-adhesion from patients and thus to treatment failure. In regards to 5-FU treatment, these local reactions are related to the pharmacological action of the molecule. The current therapeutic challenge is to reduce the local reactions induced by 5-FU without interfering with its efficacy, in particular by the use of an emollient cream. The aim of the present study is to investigate how the use of an emollient, namely Dexeryl, could improve the local skin reactions occurring during 4 weeks of a 4% 5-FU treatment.

Interventions

DRUG5-fluorouracil 4% (Tolak)

Application of Tolak once daily in the evening for 4 weeks

DEVICEDexeryl

Application of Dexeryl once daily in the morning for 8 weeks

Sponsors

Clinact
CollaboratorOTHER
Pierre Fabre Medicament
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

This study is investigator-blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants are eligible only if all of the following criteria apply: Age 1. Participant must be more than 18 years old inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. Type of Participant and Disease Characteristics 2. Individuals with a clinical diagnosis of actinic keratosis (AK). 3. Individuals harboring 5 or more clinically recognizable (palpable and/or visible to unaided eye) AK lesions of the face, and/or ears and/or scalp. The AK lesions must be clinically typical non hypertrophic and/or nonhyperkeratotic. 4. Subject in good general condition and free of any disease state or condition which, in the investigator's opinion, could impair evaluation of actinic keratosis or could expose the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation. Sex 5. Male or female. A Female participant is eligible to participate if she is not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP), defined as postmenopausal (cessation of menses \>12 months) or surgically sterile (history of bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, total hysterectomy). Informed Consent 6. Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol. Ethical/Legal considerations 7. Affiliated to a social security system, or is a beneficiary (if applicable in the national regulation).

Exclusion criteria

Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: Medical Conditions 1. With AK lesions within treatment areas which are hyperkeratotic or which are clinically suspected to be squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). 2. With pre-existing local skin reactions with a total score ≥ 3. 3. History of hypersensitivity to the ingredients of Tolak® or Dexeryl®. 4. With a known allergy to peanut or soya. 5. Non postmenopausal or non surgically sterile woman considered as WOCBP, pregnant or breastfeeding women. Prior/Concomitant Therapy 6. Under systemic 5-fluorouracil or any systemic cancer treatment within eight weeks prior to the study. 7. Under any other topical AK treatments or therapies (e.g., Cryotherapy or Photodynamic therapy) in the treatment area(s) within eight weeks prior to starting the study. 8. Treated with systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or immunomodulators within four weeks prior to the study. 9. Under prescription retinoids or topical steroids in the treatment area(s) within four weeks prior to the study. 10. With known dihydropyrimidinedehydrogénase (DPD) deficiency or under treatment with brivudine, sorivudine or analogues within 4 weeks prior to starting the study. 11. Treated with glycolic acid products and alpha-hydroxy products in the treatment area(s) within four weeks prior to starting the study. 12. Treated with chemical peeling products in the treatment area(s) within eight weeks prior to starting the study. Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience 13. Is participating in another clinical trial 14. Has participated in another clinical trial within the last 30 days, has received treatment with known remnant effects or undergone investigation liable to interfere with the present clinical trial Other Exclusions 15. Is a family member of the Investigator or any associate, colleague, and employee assisting in the conduct of the study (secretary, nurse, technician,…) 16. Is in a position likely to represent a conflict of interest 17. Has forfeited his / her freedom by administrative or legal award or is under guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) total scoreat 4 weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Investigator-assessed score: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration) for a minimal score of 0 (best outcome possible), and a maximal score of 24 (worst outcome possible).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) items aloneat 2 weeks (first follow-up)Presence/absence/intensity of each item of the LSR: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration). For each item, 0 is the best outcome possible, 4 is the worst
Subjective signs at each visitat 2 weeks (first follow-up)Patient questionnaire evaluating prurit (0-3), stinging/burning (0-3), pain (0-4). 0 is the best outcome, 10 is the worst outcome.
Local reactions according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) grade 3 or 4at 2 weeks (first follow-up)Intensity grading of adverse events
Adverse Events reported by patients or noticed by investigatorat 2, 4 and 8 weeks (first follow-up)
Drop outs due to Adverse Events (AE) related to local skin reactionat 2, 4 and 8 weeks (first follow-up)discontinuation rate
Use of rescue treatmentat 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Local Skin Reaction (LSR) total scoreat 2 weeks (first follow-up)Investigator-assessed score: 6 objective items scored from 0-4 (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration) for a minimal score of 0 (best outcome possible), and a maximal score of 24 (worst outcome possible).
Treatment adherenceat 4 weeksassessed by the participant using a self questionnaire
Health-related quality of life measured by actinic keratosis quality of life questionnaire (AKQoL)at 8 weeks (last follow up)actinic keratosis quality of life patient questionnaire, for Spain and Germany only. 0 is the best outcome, 27 is the worst outcome
Rates of patients with complete and partial clearance ratesat 8 weeks (last follow up)
Rates of patients with partial clearance ratesat 8 weeks (last follow up)
Percentage change in number of AK lesionsat baseline
Change in number of AK lesionsat 2 weeks (first follow-up)
Treatment satisfaction (acceptability): measured by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 9 (TSQM-9)at 4 weeks (end of treatment) or at Patient WithdrawalThe TSQM-9 questionnaire includes nine questions that assess patients' satisfaction by providing score on three scales: effectiveness (questions 1 to 3), convenience (questions 4 to 6) and global satisfaction (questions 7 to 9). The scores of each scale range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a greater satisfaction

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026