Skip to content

Study to Evaluate NBI-921352 as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With SCN8A Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy Syndrome (SCN8A-DEE)

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of NBI-921352 as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With SCN8A Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy Syndrome (SCN8A-DEE)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04873869
Enrollment
8
Registered
2021-05-05
Start date
2022-01-31
Completion date
2023-03-17
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

SCN8A Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy Syndrome

Keywords

Epilepsy, Sodium channel, voltage-gated, type VIII, alpha subunit (SCN8A), NaV1.6 inhibitor

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of NBI-921352 as adjunctive therapy for seizures in subjects with SCN8A Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy Syndrome (SCN8A-DEE).

Interventions

Administered orally

DRUGPlacebo

Administered orally

Sponsors

Neurocrine Biosciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female 2 to 21 years of age, inclusive. 2. Have a diagnosis of SCN8A-DEE supported by both clinical and genetic findings 3. Have on average at least 1 countable motor seizure per week and not be seizure-free for more than 20 consecutive days 4. Being treated with at least 1 other antiseizure medication (ASM), but no more than 4 ASMs 5. Have failed to achieve seizure freedom with at least 2 ASMs 6. Must be using a nocturnal alerting system or practice consistent with standards of care at the time of screening and continue to use this for the duration of the study 7. Must have an adequate rescue medication regimen per the investigator's judgment in place at the time of screening and for the duration of the study 8. Have a body weight of at least 10 kg 9. The subject's parent/caregiver is able to accurately identify seizure types, especially countable motor seizures (defined as GTCS, tonic, atonic or FOS with noticeable motor component) and is able to complete seizure diary

Exclusion criteria

1. Have previously been enrolled in this study and received blinded treatment 2. Have participated in an interventional clinical trial \< 30 days prior to screening 3. Have symptoms that would be more consistent with another epilepsy disorder such as Dravet syndrome (eg, fever-induced episodes of status epilepticus, frequent myoclonic seizures, worsening on sodium channel blockers, absence seizures with generalized spike-and-wave EEG as the sole seizure type) 4. Are currently receiving cannabinoids or medical marijuana except Epidiolex/Epidyolex, unless approved by the Sponsor 5. Are currently taking systemic steroids (excluding inhaled medication for asthma treatments and intranasal steroids for allergies). If subject has received these medications in the past, must be off these medications for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit and these drugs may not be initiated during the duration of the study. Intermittent steroids to treat nonepilepsy related diseases (such as allergies or dermatological conditions) are not exclusionary 6. Have a history of moderate or severe head trauma or other neurological disorders or systemic medical diseases that are, in the investigator's opinion, likely to affect nervous system functioning 7. Have a clinically significant medical condition or chronic disease, that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude the subject from participating in and completing the study or that could confound interpretation of study outcome 8. Have clinically significant abnormal vital signs at the screening visit as determined by the investigator 9. Have one or more clinical laboratory test values outside the reference range, based on blood samples taken at the screening visit, that are of potential risk to the subject's safety as determined by the investigator 10. Have, at the screening visit, an electrocardiogram (ECG) finding of a corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) \> 450 msec or presence of any significant cardiac abnormality.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Countable Motor Seizures During the 16-week Treatment PeriodPlanned time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Countable Motor Seizures During the 10-week Maintenance PeriodPlanned time frame: Baseline, Week 6 to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 25%, ≥ 75%, or 100% Treatment Response During the 16-week Treatment PeriodPlanned time frame: Baseline to Week 16Treatment response was defined as a ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% decrease from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency for countable motor seizures during the treatment period of the study.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% Treatment Response During the 10-week Maintenance PeriodPlanned time frame: Baseline, Week 6 to Week 16Treatment response was defined as a ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% decrease from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency for countable motor seizures during the treatment period of the study.
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment ResponsePlanned time frame: Baseline to Week 16Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% decrease from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency for countable motor seizures during the treatment period of the study.
Parent/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (GIC) Score at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment PeriodPlanned time frame: Up to Week 16The GIC scale was used to assess the parent/caregiver's impression of change in the participant's overall condition since starting study treatment and was rated on a 7-point scale (1=very much improved to 7=very much worse).
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGIS) Scores at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment PeriodPlanned time frame: Baseline to Week 16The CGIS scale was used to assess overall severity on a 5-point scale (range: 1=normal, not at all ill to 5=among the most extremely ill).
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver Global Impression of Severity (GIS) Scores at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment PeriodPlanned time frame: Baseline through Week 16The GIS scale was used to assess overall severity on a 5-point scale (range: 1=none to 5=very severe).
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Score at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment PeriodPlanned time frame: Up to Week 16The CGIC scale, which is based on a 7-point scale (range: 1=very much improved to 7=very much worse), was used to rate the overall global improvement since the initiation of study treatment dosing, as rated by the investigator (or qualified designee).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was prematurely terminated due to sponsor decision. Due to the early termination, only 8 participants were enrolled and completed the study. As prespecified, analyses were pooled by treatment received (NBI-921352 or placebo), rather than specific dose level received.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NBI-921352
Participants received oral doses of NBI-921352 3 times a day based on body weight.
4
Placebo
Participants received oral doses of placebo matching NBI-921352 3 times a day.
4
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalNBI-921352
Age, Continuous9.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.87
6.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
4.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 44 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 41 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Countable Motor Seizures During the 16-week Treatment Period

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGIS) Scores at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment Period

The CGIS scale was used to assess overall severity on a 5-point scale (range: 1=normal, not at all ill to 5=among the most extremely ill).

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver Global Impression of Severity (GIS) Scores at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment Period

The GIS scale was used to assess overall severity on a 5-point scale (range: 1=none to 5=very severe).

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline through Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Score at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment Period

The CGIC scale, which is based on a 7-point scale (range: 1=very much improved to 7=very much worse), was used to rate the overall global improvement since the initiation of study treatment dosing, as rated by the investigator (or qualified designee).

Time frame: Planned time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Parent/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (GIC) Score at Each Visit During the 16-week Treatment Period

The GIC scale was used to assess the parent/caregiver's impression of change in the participant's overall condition since starting study treatment and was rated on a 7-point scale (1=very much improved to 7=very much worse).

Time frame: Planned time frame: Up to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Countable Motor Seizures During the 10-week Maintenance Period

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline, Week 6 to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% Treatment Response During the 10-week Maintenance Period

Treatment response was defined as a ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% decrease from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency for countable motor seizures during the treatment period of the study.

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline, Week 6 to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 25%, ≥ 75%, or 100% Treatment Response During the 16-week Treatment Period

Treatment response was defined as a ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% decrease from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency for countable motor seizures during the treatment period of the study.

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Response

Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% decrease from baseline in 28-day seizure frequency for countable motor seizures during the treatment period of the study.

Time frame: Planned time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Due to early study termination, analyses of efficacy data were not performed due to an insufficient sample size to allow for meaningful statistical analysis of the data, as pre-specified in the protocol.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026