Skip to content

Real-World Outcomes Study on Subjects Treated With Radiofrequency Ablation

Real-World Outcomes Study on Subjects Treated With Radiofrequency Ablation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04873817
Acronym
ROSTRA
Enrollment
184
Registered
2021-05-05
Start date
2021-06-29
Completion date
2023-03-08
Last updated
2024-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

IonicRF™ Generator, ABT-CIP-10347, Radio frequency ablation (RFA), Chronic pain

Brief summary

ROSTRA is an international, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, multi-center, and post-market study to collect real-world safety and effectiveness data on Abbott's IonicRF™Generator and compatible RFA accessories. This post-market study is intended to satisfy EU MDR requirements.

Interventions

DEVICEIonicRF Generator and compatible accessories

Participants will receive IonicRF lesion generator, along with any country-specific market-released accessory (i.e. electrode, cannula, grounding pad, and adaptor cable) compatible with the IonicRF Generator

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A. All candidate subjects 1. Subject must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical investigation-related procedure 2. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age 3. Subject has chronic pain \> 6 months and was unresponsive to conservative management 4. Subject has pain on an NRS scale of ≥ 6 5. Subject is scheduled for an RFA procedure with the IonicRF generator within 30 days of baseline to treat chronic pain at one anatomical region 6. Subject has stable chronic pain medication use for 30 days 7. Subject is willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up evaluations B. Candidate subjects with facet joint pain (lumbar or cervical) 1. Subject has unilateral or bilateral pain on para-spinal palpation and localized pain with extension/lateral bending 2. Subject has facet joint pain confirmed by at least 1 positive medial branch block with 0.5 mL or less of anesthetics (across at least 3 vertebral levels) achieving at least 50% pain relief, with real-time injection of radiographic contrast under fluoroscopic guidance C. Candidate subjects with sacroiliac joint pain 1. Subject has sacroiliac joint pain based on medical history and physical exam 2. Subject has sacroiliac joint pain confirmed by an infiltration of local anesthetics in the posterior part of the sacroiliac joint achieving at least 50% pain relief D. Candidate subjects with radicular pain 1. Subject has radicular pain based on medical history and physical exam 2. Subject has radicular pain confirmed by dermatomal mapping corresponding to at least 1 nerve root level E. Candidate subjects with trigeminal neuralgia 1. Subject has trigeminal pain based on medical history and physical exam 2. Subject did not have any mass effect or stroke causing trigeminal pain confirmed by MRI 3. Subject is ≥ 60 years of age in case of a neurovascular conflict F. Candidate subjects with knee or hip pain 1. Subject has knee or hip pain based on medical history and physical exam 2. Subject has radiographically confirmed osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, or has chronic pain following joint arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

A. All candidate subjects 1. Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation that may confound the results of this study. 2. Ongoing systemic or local infection in the area of the procedure. 3. Recent use of anticoagulants or subject with coagulopathy. 4. Primary complaint of deafferentation pain. 5. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements of the clinical investigation results. 6. Subject's opioid usage is \> 90 morphine equivalents per day. B. Candidate subjects with trigeminal neuralgia 1\. Subject has sensory problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Relative Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to 3 Months Follow-up VisitBaseline to 3 monthsThe pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. The presented outcome denotes the mean relative change in NRS score, which was defined as (Baseline score - 3-month follow-up visit score)/ Baseline score\*100%. Higher scores indicate greater relative pain relief. Minimum value is 0% and maximum value is 100%.
Primary Safety Endpoint: Incidence of Device- and Procedure-related Serious Adverse EventsAt 3 monthsNumber of participants with Device- and Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events.

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study has enrolled 184 subjects at 11 clinical sites in EU and the US. The total duration of the study is expected to be 20 months, including enrollment, data collection from all subjects, and study closeout.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IonicRF Generator and Compatible Accessories
IonicRF Radiofrequency Generator, along with any country-specific market-released accessory (i.e. electrode, cannula, grounding pad, and adaptor cable) compatible with the IonicRF Generator will be used.
179
Total179

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdditional Chronic Pain Treatment for The Same Anatomical Region8
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4
Overall StudyOther Reasons3
Overall StudySubject and/or Family Request Withdrew Consent3
Overall StudyUnsuccessful RFA Procedure1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIonicRF Generator and Compatible Accessories
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Duration of Chronic Pain (Years)9.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
96 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
65 Participants
Number of diagnostic blocks provided to participants prior to therapy implementation
0
59 Participants
Number of diagnostic blocks provided to participants prior to therapy implementation
1
47 Participants
Number of diagnostic blocks provided to participants prior to therapy implementation
2
73 Participants
Pain Relief after second diagnostic block74.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
Pain Relief after the first diagnostic block71.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
49 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
127 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 162
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 162
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 162

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Relative Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to 3 Months Follow-up Visit

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. The presented outcome denotes the mean relative change in NRS score, which was defined as (Baseline score - 3-month follow-up visit score)/ Baseline score\*100%. Higher scores indicate greater relative pain relief. Minimum value is 0% and maximum value is 100%.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IonicRF Generator and Compatible AccessoriesPrimary Effectiveness Endpoint: Relative Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to 3 Months Follow-up Visit34.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.7
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Primary Safety Endpoint: Incidence of Device- and Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events

Number of participants with Device- and Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events.

Time frame: At 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IonicRF Generator and Compatible AccessoriesPrimary Safety Endpoint: Incidence of Device- and Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026