Skip to content

Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During High-risk Carotid Artery Stenting

Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During High-risk Carotid Artery Stenting

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04872127
Acronym
MOSCASH
Enrollment
0
Registered
2021-05-04
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2022-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Stenosis, Stroke

Keywords

carotid stenting, embolism protection, Carotid Stenosis

Brief summary

A multicenter, prospective, outcome-assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial study (MOSCASH) is designed to compare the efficiency of distal and proximal embolism protection devices during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) procedure of patients with high-intensity signal in the plaque on the time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography(TOF-MRA) .

Detailed description

CAS is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy(CEA) for treating carotid stenosis with a similar efficacy in preventing future stroke. High-intensity signal in the plaque on the TOF-MRA is associated to a high risk of cerebral embolism during stenting. The evidence of protection selection in such patients was limited. A multicenter, prospective, outcome-assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial study (MOSCASH) is designed to compare the efficiency of distal and proximal embolism protection devices during CAS procedure of patients with high-intensity signal in the plaque on the TOF-MRA. Asymptomatic patients with internal carotid artery stenosis ≥ 70% (NASCET) and symptomatic patients with a stenosis ≥ 50% who have a high-intensity signal in the relevant plaques on TOF-MRA will be included. Patients are randomized in two balanced groups (1:1) to receive CAS with either distal (Spider FX) or proximal (Mo.Ma Ultra) protection. The primary endpoint is the incidence of new cerebral ipsilateral ischemic lesions on the Diffusion Weighted Imaging(DWI) in 7-days post operation. Secondary endpoints include the number, size, location of new cerebral ischemic lesions on the DWI, procedural complications, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death in 7 days.

Interventions

DEVICEproximal embolism protection device

a proximal occlusion Mo.Ma will be used as the embolism protection device during CAS

DEVICEdistal embolism protection device

a distal SpiderFX will be used as the embolism protection device during CAS

Sponsors

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female patients 40 years of age and older. 2. Asymptomatic patients with internal carotid artery stenosis≥70% on angiography. 3. Symptomatic patients with internal carotid artery stenosis≥50% on angiography. 4. High-intensity Signal in the relevant plaques on the TOF-MRA. 5. Anatomic characteristics of the lesions that made it possible to use either type of embolism protective device (proximal or distal). 6. The patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Medical Ethics Committee, Institutional Review Board, or Human Research Ethics Committee.

Exclusion criteria

1. Extensive ipsilateral or disabling stroke(mRS≥2). 2. Ischemic ipsilateral stroke in 15 days, with significant new ischemic lesions on the DWI image. 3. Ipsilateral intracranial artery stenosis which needs to be treated at the same time. 4. Extremely calcified aortic arc that compromised the origin of the common carotid artery or the brachiocephalic trunk. 5. Chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation. 6. Acute coronary syndrome in the 30-day period before the procedure. 7. Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis within 1 month or coagulopathy or patients in whom antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated. 8. Intolerance or allergic reaction to a study medication without a suitable management alternative. 9. Pregnant or lactating female patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ipsilateral new ischemic lesions on DWIwithin 7 days post-operationthe incidence of ipsilateral new ischemic lesions on DWI after CAS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
major strokewithin 7 days post-operationthe incidence of major stroke after CAS, defined as new onset of neurological symptoms causing an increase of NIHSS ≥ 4 or worsening of existing focal neurological deficit lasting ≥ 24 hours
myocardial infarctionwithin 7 days post-operationthe incidence of myocardial infarction after CAS, defined as new onset of chest discomfort or cardiac stroke or heart failure with a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers and ECG abnormalities
deathwithin 7 days post-operationIn-hospital mortality
Other procedure-related complicationswithin 7 days post-operationincluding major/minor hemorrhage, acute kidney injury, etc.
The number, size, and location of new cerebral ischemic lesions on DW-MRIwithin 7 days post-operationThe number, size, and location of new cerebral ischemic lesions on DW-MRI

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026