Skip to content

Immunoadsorption Versus Plasma Exchange for Treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

Immunoadsorption Versus Plasma Exchange for Treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04871035
Acronym
IPET-GBS
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-05-04
Start date
2021-04-28
Completion date
2025-05-04
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

GBS

Brief summary

This is an observations study evaluating safety and efficacy of immunoadsorption compared to plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

Interventions

1 cycle, consisting of 5 sessions on 5 consecutive days with processing of the 0.7-fold individual plasma volume (maximum 2.5 l) each days with tryptophan adsorbers.

DEVICEPlasma Exchange

1 cycle, consisting of 5 sessions on 5 consecutive days with exchange of 0.7-fold plasma volume (maximum 2.5 l) each day with albumin solution as volume replacement solution.

Sponsors

DiaMed GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Ulm
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome according to the diagnostic criteria proposed by Doorn et al. (Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome, Lancet neurology 2008) * age 18 years or above

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical or laboratory (C-reactive protein 20 mg/l or above, or evidence of nitrite-positive urinary tract infection) evidence of manifest systemic infection * Intake of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor within1 weeks before first treatment * Other contraindications against immunoadsorption or plasma exchange

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Score2 weeksCombined score consisting of Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Oxford muscle strength score, and vibration score, equally weighted
Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score2 weeksStandard clinical score for inflammatory neuropathies.
Oxford Muscle Strength Score (Medical Research Council, MRC)2 weeksStandard clinical score for evaluating muscle strength / paresis. Muscle strength will be measured on a scale between 0 (no movement) and 5 (full strength) on 8 pre-defined muscles (one proximal and one distal muscle at each extremity).
Vibration Score2 weeksStandard clinical score for evaluation of vibration sensitivity on a scale between 0 and 8, using a 256 tuning fork at 4 predefined spots (processus styloideus radii and malleolus lateralis on both sides).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vibration Score1, 3, and 5 weeksStandard clinical score for evaluation of vibration sensitivity on a scale between 0 and 8, using a 256 tuning fork at 4 predefined spots (processus styloideus radii and malleolus lateralis on both sides).
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Score1, 3, and 5 weeksCombined score consisting of Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Oxford muscle strength score, and vibration score, equally weighted
Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score1, 3, and 5 weeksStandard clinical score for inflammatory neuropathies.
Oxford Muscle Strength Score (Medical Research Council, MRC)1, 3, and 5 weeksStandard clinical score for evaluating muscle strength / paresis. Muscle strength will be measured on a scale between 0 (no movement) and 5 (full strength) on 8 pre-defined muscles (one proximal and one distal muscle at each extremity).
Hughes Score1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksStandard clinical score to quantify disability in Guillain-Barré syndrome
Pain1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksPain quantified on a visual analog scale between 0 (no pain) and 10 (maximum pain).
N202 and 5 weeksN20 latency of nervus medianus (both sides) as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)
P402 and 5 weeksP40 latency of nervus tibialis (both sides) as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials
Nerve Conduction Velocity2 and 5 weeksNerve conduction velocity of clinically affected nerves as measured by electroneurography (ENG)
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksQuality of Life Scale
Immunoglobulin A in serum1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksImmunoglobulin A serum concentration
Immunoglobulin A in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)2 weeksImmunoglobulin A concentration in cerebrospinal fluid
Immunoglobulin G in serum1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksImmunoglobulin G serum concentration
Immunoglobulin G in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)2 weeksImmunoglobulin G concentration in cerebrospinal fluid
Immunoglobulin M in serum1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksImmunoglobulin M serum concentration
Immunoglobulin M in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)2 weeksImmunoglobulin M concentration in cerebrospinal fluid
Interleukin-11, 2, 3, and 5 weeksInterleukin-1 serum concentration
Interleukin-61, 2, 3, and 5 weeksInterleukin-6 serum concentration
Anti-GM1 antibodies1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksAnti-GM1 antibody serum levels
Anti-GQ1b1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksAnti-GQQ1b antibody serum levels
Neurofilament light chain (NfL) serum1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksNeurofilament light chain (NfL) serum levels
Neurofilament light chain (NfL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)2 weeksNeurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
Safety and Tolerability1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksKind and frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Therapeutic Response1, 2, 3, and 5 weeksShare of patients with at least 20% improvement in CIDP score

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactJohannes Dorst, Prof
johannes.dorst@uni-ulm.de+49 731 177 5285

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026