Skip to content

Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean

Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04871022
Enrollment
126
Registered
2021-05-04
Start date
2021-05-15
Completion date
2022-07-01
Last updated
2022-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine Scar Defect

Keywords

niche

Brief summary

There are different surgical techniques of uterine closure during cesarean. Currently data suggest that the double layer unlocked closure technique is associated with better uterine scar healing, and this technique is considered the gold standard. This study compares two techniques of uterine closure on myometrium thickness: 1. Double layer unlocked suture; 2. Purse suture of the uterus with a first continuous purse suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture including the remaining part of the myometrium. The primary outcome is the mean residual myometrium thickness at the site of the uterine scar evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound at six months after cesarean.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDouble layer closure of the hysterotomy

Double layer closure with a first continuous unlocked suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture that approximate the upper portion of the myometrium.

PROCEDUREPurse closure of the hysterotomy

Purse suture of the uterus with a first continuous purse suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture including the remaining part of the myometrium

Sponsors

University Tunis El Manar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 48 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Planned cesarean * Primary cesarean * ≥ 38 gestational weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Previous cesarean * Women \< 18 years old * Multiple gestation * Mullerian anomalies * Active labor * Diabetes * BMI \>35 kg/m2 * Placenta praevia * Chronic systemic disease * Covid-19 infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Residual myometrium thickness6 months after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operative timeSame day of intervention: day 1
Estimated blood lossSame day of intervention: day 1
Mean number of haemostatic suturesSame day of intervention: day 1
scar widthSame day of intervention: day 1

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026