Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of G-POEM for Gastroparesis

A Pilot and Feasibility Trial of G-POEM for Gastroparesis to Assess Safety, Physiological Mechanisms and Efficacy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04869670
Enrollment
3
Registered
2021-05-03
Start date
2023-07-12
Completion date
2025-03-03
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroparesis

Keywords

Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy (G-POEM)

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the 12-month treatment effect of peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) vs. sham surgery in patients with gastroparesis that is not helped by medications and to analyze factors that may predict the outcome of the surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGastric peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Under propofol anesthesia, EndoFLIP will be used to assess pyloric diameter and distensibility, prior to and after G-POEM, performed by an endoscopist skilled in this technique. After the procedure, the patient will be observed in the hospital for 2 days. Patients will undergo an upper GI series the next day to rule out perforation. If the patient develops a complication from the procedure, he or she will be managed per standard clinical practice by the treating (unblinded) endoscopist.

PROCEDURESham Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Patients assigned to the sham procedure will be treated identically as above, except for the performance of the G-POEM. Endoscopy and EndoFLIP will be performed and sedation will be stopped when the upper endoscopy is completed. Since sham endoscopy is expected to take less time than G-POEM, the patient should remain in the endoscopy procedure room for a minimum of 30 minutes (including the time required to complete the upper endoscopy). After the procedure, the patient will be observed in the hospital for 2 days. All patients will undergo an upper GI series radiographic examination the next day to rule out perforation in order to maintain study blind.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptoms of chronic nausea or vomiting compatible with gastroparesis (idiopathic or diabetic) must be present for at least one year (does not have to be contiguous) prior to registration. * Must have a mean total Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score of ≥ 3 at screening visit. * Refractory gastroparesis, defined using our previously published data5, as a failure to improve over the last 6 months, despite an adequate trial of one or more standard prokinetics (metoclopramide, erythromycin, prucalopride), antinauseants (5-HT3 antagonists, promethazine, prochlorperazine, dronabinol), or neuromodulators (mirtazapine, buspirone). * Moderate to severe delay in gastric emptying, defined as \> 25% solid retained at 4 hours or \> 75% retained at 2 hours. The qualifying gastric emptying scintigraphy must be performed within 18 months prior to registration or can be the baseline gastric emptying. * No evidence of mechanical obstruction based on upper GI endoscopy or upper GI series in their medical history.

Exclusion criteria

* Another active disorder which could explain symptoms in the opinion of the investigator. * Gastric retention of solids at 4 hours \< 25% or \< 75% at 2 hours. * Ongoing use of prokinetic agents (e.g., metoclopramide, erythromycin, prucalopride) GLP -1 analog or agonists, or drugs that slow down gastric emptying (narcotics). Neuromodulators such as tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline or nortriptyline) or others that are being used at stable doses for a month prior to randomization may continue at the discretion of the care provider. * Significant systemic illness such as chronic renal failure (adjusted for age) or liver disease as defined by Child-Pugh score of 10 or greater. * Poorly controlled diabetes with HbA1c of greater than 10% at time of screening. * New medications for gastroparesis-related symptoms started within 1 month prior to registration. * Pregnancy or nursing. * Failure to give informed consent. * Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would impede compliance or hinder completion of the study. * Botox injection into the pylorus within 3 months prior to registration. * Allergy to eggs or Egg Beaters and Ensure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GCSI-DD ChangeBaseline to 48 weeks post treatmentThe effect of GPOEM on nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal pain as per changes in patient scoring in The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) which has been designed to assess symptoms associated with gastroparesis. ANMS GCSI-DD evaluates five core symptoms: nausea, bloating, upper abdominal pain, stomach fullness and inability to finish a meal. Each symptom is rated 0-4 with 0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe, and 4= very severe. The five responses are summed and divided by the number of responses completed to compute a total mean score range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed by the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life ScaleBaseline to 48 weeks post treatmentThe effect of GPOEM on quality of life assessed by the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QoL). The PAGI-QOL instrument consists of 30 items, each with response options based on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (lowest QoL) to 5 (highest QoL) and with a recall period of the previous 2 weeks. The items are grouped into 5 dimensions: Daily Activities, Clothing, Diet and Food Habits, Relationship and Psychological Well-being and Distress. The 30 responses are summed and divided by the number of responses completed to compute a total mean score range of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Camilleri, MD

Mayo Clinic

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Protocol enrollment includes all participants who consented and entered screening. Three participants were enrolled in the study, one of which screen failed prior to randomization.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 20 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026