Skip to content

The Use of a Digital Application for Reporting Pain and Pain Management in Home Hospice

The Use of a Digital Application for Reporting Pain and Pain Management in Home Hospice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04869085
Acronym
ePainSupport
Enrollment
88
Registered
2021-05-03
Start date
2021-04-21
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2026-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain, Pain management, Analgesics, Adherence, Hospice, End-of-Life Care, Caregiver, m-Health, digital interventions

Brief summary

Poor adherence to pain management and high pain intensity associated with serious, advanced illness is a major public health concern. This randomized clinical trial will test the efficacy of a newly enhanced digital pain and pain management application (e-PainSupport) for use in a home hospice setting. The e-PainSupport application delivers an education module about pain management to patients and caregivers, expedites pain reporting to nurses, and facilitates adherence to pain management. The overall goal of the e-PainSupport application is to improve pain management and reduce patient pain intensity in the home hospice setting.

Detailed description

High pain intensity is a common symptom experienced by patients with serious advanced illness. However, pain management for patients in home hospice is less than optimal. Impediments to improving pain intensity are poor adherence to pain management regimen due in part to caregiver lack of knowledge (a barrier to reporting pain and using analgesics) and lack of self-efficacy (confidence) in administering analgesics. Digital applications may facilitate pain management by: (1) delivering education to increase knowledge and self-efficacy, (2) expediting pain reporting to nurses, and (3) improving adherence to pain management. e-PainSupport is a self-administered, digital pain management application developed in collaboration with hospice nurses and caregivers. It is directly linked to a patient's medical record and enhanced by an evidence-based educational module. It has three elements: (a) Educational Module, (b) Patient Pain Record, and (c) Pain Summary for Nurses. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of e-PainSupport on home hospice patient pain intensity when used by patients, caregivers and nurses. Participants (132 triads of patient, caregiver, and the hospice nurse assigned to the patient will be recruited from one large Midwest hospice agency. Patient and caregiver outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks post baseline. Data will be analyzed with multi-level modeling. Post-intervention semi-structured interviews will be conducted with nurses who provided care to patients in the e-PainSupport condition. Qualitative content analysis will be used to identify themes related to perceived practice changes after using e-PainSupport. e-PainSupport has potential as a useful tool to advance home hospice care by enhancing the quality of caregiver pain management, facilitating nurse-patient communication, and improving management of patient pain intensity.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALe-PainSupport

Patients and caregivers assigned to the e-PainSupport condition will download the app on their own device, or they will be given a project tablet with wireless capability if they do not have their own device. All receive specific training for the intervention. They will also receive a hardcopy of the e-PainSupport manual and a trouble-shooting guide. Contact information will be provided in the app and on paper for technical problems. Caregivers complete Education Module, and patients may complete it. Caregiver or patient will fill out Pain Report daily. Pain Summary for Nurses is an automatically generated graphic summary of patients' Pain Reports over time. Nurses have access to this information during the time the patients and caregivers use e-PainSupport.

Sponsors

Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Data Collectors will be blinded to the intervention. Study participants will be asked to not disclose their treatment condition.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(patient) * prior enrollment of their hospice nurse * receives analgesics for pain * speaks and reads English * age 18 or older * has a primary informal caregiver who is available for the 2 weeks of the study * expected survival of at least 2 weeks * can verbalize pain. Inclusion criteria (caregiver) * speaks and reads English * age 18 or older * cares for an enrolled patient * available for the 2 weeks of the study. Inclusion criteria (nurses participating in the RTC) * registered nurse (RN) * provides direct care to patients * has not had a prior patient enrolled in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimally Important Clinical Change in Worst Pain IntensityBaseline to 2-weeks post baselineAt least 20 percent change on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity-Short Form 3a v1.0: 3 items: Worst pain and average pain in past 7 days scored from 1 = no pain, 2= mild, 3 = moderate, 4= severe, 5 = very severe pain. Higher scores indicates higher pain intensity.
Minimally Important Clinical Change in Average Pain IntensityBaseline to 2-weeks post baselineAt Least 20 Percent Change on the PROMIS Average Pain Scale. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity-Short Form 3a v1.0: Average pain in past 7 days, and current pain, scored from 1 = no pain, 2= mild, 3 = moderate, 4= severe, 5 = very severe pain, summed for a range of 3 to 15. Higher scores indicates higher pain intensity.
Minimally Important Clinical Change in Current Pain IntensityBaseline to 2-weeks post baselineAt least 20 percent change on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity-Short Form 3a v1.0: 3 items: current pain, scored from 1 = no pain, 2= mild, 3 = moderate, 4= severe, 5 = very severe pain. Higher scores indicates higher pain intensity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Continuous Score of the Pain Intensity ScaleBaseline to 2-weeks post baselinePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity-Short Form 3a v1.0. 3items: worst pain and average pain in past 7 days, and current pain, scored from 1 = no pain, 2= mild, 3 = moderate, 4= severe, 5 = very severe pain, summed for a range of 3 to 15. Higher scores indicates higher pain intensity.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMasako Mayahara, PhD

Rush University Medical Center

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
Caregiver demographics
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Caregiver demographics
>=65 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Caregiver demographics
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants
Age, Categorical
Patient demographics
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Patient demographics
>=65 years
19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Patient demographics
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Age, Continuous
Caregiver participant age
55.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.48
Age, Continuous
Patient participant age
72.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.84
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver Ethnicity
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient Ethnicity
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregiver participants
White
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patient participants
White
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Caregivers
23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Patients
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregiver gender
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregiver gender
Male
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Patient gender
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Patient gender
Male
21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 461 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 42

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026