Low vs. Moderate to High Dose Vitamin D for Prevention of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 Infection

The purpose of this study is to compare the risks of COVID-19 in individuals from Chicagoland communities randomized to low (400 IU/day) vs. moderate (4,000 IU/day) or high (10,000 IU/day) dose vitamin D.

This study will recruit 2,000 subjects from the Chicagoland area to participate in the study at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) and at Rush University (RU). Subjects will be invited to volunteer to participate in the study through a variety of forms of community outreach (flyers, presentations, emails, etc.). The sample size was chosen to have at least 80% power to detect a 25% or larger decrease in the hazard of developing COVID-19 between study arms at p\<0.05 assuming a 30% baseline COVID-19 incidence rate over the study period, in line with a 3% per month incidence. Subjects will take a daily dose of vitamin D, attend laboratory appointments for testing, and answer surveys over 9 months after enrollment. Our overall aim is to compare the risks of COVID-19 in adults in the Chicagoland area at increased risk of COVID-19 randomized to low (400 IU/day) vs. moderate (4,000 IU/day) or high (10,000 IU/day) dose vitamin D. Our specific aims are: Aim 1: To compare the risk of developing COVID-19 in adults in the Chicagoland area at increased risk of COVID-19 randomized to low vs. moderate or high dose vitamin D. Subjects will specify their preference for moderate versus high dose vitamin D and then be randomized between low dose vitamin D and their preferred moderate or high dose alternative. We hypothesize that moderate and high dose therapy will reduce rates of COVID-19 compared to low dose therapy because vitamin D will reduce symptomatic infection that prompts testing for COVID-19. Our primary analysis will pool subjects randomized to the moderate or high dose and compare them to low dose subjects, with secondary analyses comparing low to moderate and low to high. Aim 2: To compare COVID-19 seroconversion in adults in the Chicagoland area at increased risk of COVID-19 randomized to low vs. moderate or high dose vitamin D. As we suspect the main effect of vitamin D may be to decrease symptomatic disease we hypothesize that there may be little or no difference in seroconversion. Aim 3: To compare COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalization, ICU stay, ventilator use, death) in adults in the Chicagoland area at increased risk of COVID-19 randomized to low vs. moderate or high dose vitamin D. Consistent with several recent observational analyses, we expect higher doses to improve COVID-19 outcomes. Additional aims examine the relationship between vitamin D and other markers of immune response: Aim 4: Create a biobank of PBMCs from a panel of 500 individuals with well characterized levels of vitamin A and D. We propose to cryopreserve PBMCs derived from \ 20 ml of blood to test the impact of vitamin A and D levels in the regulation of immune responses. Aim 5: Evaluate the impact of vitamin A and D levels on immune function. We will perform immunophenotyping of PBMC using a panel of 30 antibodies that allow characterizing the different immune cell populations found in circulation, as well as their functional status. Using these data we will ask if there is an association between the prevalence of certain immune cell population or functional potential and vitamin A and D levels. Aim 6: Evaluate the impact of vitamin A and D levels on PBMC gene expression levels. We will perform transcriptional profiling of PBMC from a panel of 100 individuals enriched for individuals on the two extremes of the distributions of vitamin A and D levels. These data will be used to identify changes in gene expression levels that differ between individuals showing low- vs high-vitamin A/D levels. Aim 7: To test the hypothesis that oral vitamin D3 intervention will inhibit the renin- angiotensin system and reduce the incidence and/or severity of COVID-19 infections Blood labs will be taken from subjects at intake, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months. Intake labs will measure baseline calcium and PTH levels, COVID-19 antibodies, and vitamin D. Intake labs for a subset of University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) subjects will additionally measure vitamin A, vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), RAS components (Renin, Ang II, soluble ACE and ACE2), bradykinin, inflammation markers (IL-6, TNF-a, IL-1b and CRP), and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against S-protein and N-protein. 3-month labs for all subjects will measure PTH, calcium, and vitamin D for monitoring of the intervention's safety and outcomes, and COVID-19 antibodies for monitoring of the outcome. 6-month and 9-month labs for all subjects will measure PTH, calcium, and vitamin D for monitoring of the intervention's safety and COVID-19 antibodies for monitoring of the outcome. Vitamin A will be measured for a subset of UCM subjects who were high at baseline. Throughout the study period we will tell subjects about calcium, PTH and vitamin D lab results only if they suggest a safety concern for which we would like them to seek care. Subjects will be told if they test positive for COVID-19 antibodies. Except in the instance of a safety concern, subjects will be blinded to their vitamin A & D levels, calcium and PTH throughout the study to ensure protocol compliance. At the end of the study, we will inform subjects of their vitamin D levels. Electronic Medical Records will be reviewed for predictors and indicators of COVID-19 and for severity of infection if subject has had a positive COVID-19 test result. Subjects will be asked to complete a web-based survey at intake, 3, 6 and 9 months. The intake survey will collect baseline data on subjects' current medications and supplements, sun exposure, Fitzpatrick skin type, exercise, diet and sleep habits, possible COVID-19 symptoms, and other influenza-like symptoms. Subjects will also be asked to report suspected exposure to the virus, occupation, and demographic information. Subjects will also be asked to evaluate risks of exposure. Follow-up surveys at months 3, 6, and 9 will ask the participant (or proxy) whether the participant has had a clinically confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, and the date if so, ask about rates of study medication adherence, and assess for changes in the intake questions about use of other supplements, sun exposure, diet, exercise, and COVID-19 exposures. If the patient is reported to have had COVID-19, we ask about severity, including hospitalization and duration, ICU-use and duration, and need for mechanical ventilation and duration, death and COVID-19 symptom severity.

No related papers found yet.

United States

Participants by arm