Skip to content

End-range Maitland Mobilization on Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Proprioception

The Effect of End-range Maitland Mobilization on Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Proprioception in Volleyball Players

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04868006
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-04-30
Start date
2021-09-28
Completion date
2021-10-10
Last updated
2022-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Range Of Motion, Articular, Proprioception, Volleyball

Brief summary

Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) is one of the main reasons for glenohumeral pain in athletes with over-head activity. As GIRD increases, the ratio between internal and external rotation changes resulting in decreased joint stability. Joint mobilization is a possible option for the decrease of GIRD and contribution to improvement of proprioception in addition to physical therapy. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effect of end-range Maitland mobilization in addition to physical therapy on GIRD, other joint movements and proprioception.

Detailed description

Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) is one of the main reasons for glenohumeral pain in athletes with over-head activity. As GIRD increases, the ratio between internal and external rotation changes resulting in decreased joint stability. The occurence of GIRD and decreased joint proprioception may lead to different shoulder pathologies (e.g. Impingement syndrome). Joint mobilization is a possible option for the decrease of GIRD and contribution to improvement of proprioception in addition to physical therapy. Several joint mobilization techniques exists, which can be applied for stretching of periarticular tissues. Maitland mobilization is a well applied mobilization type. The effectiveness of both end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization in lengthening of periarticular tissues and improvement of joint proprioception has been previously confirmed amongst several diseases. However, the effect of end-range Maitland mobilization on decrease of GIRD and proprioception in addition to physical therapy has not been investigated in volleyball players so far. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effect of end-range Maitland mobilization in addition to physical therapy on GIRD, other joint movements and proprioception.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEnd-range Maitland mobilization + proprioception training

End-range Maitland mobilization performed in end position of internal rotation of the shoulder accompanied with 8--week long proprioception training

PROCEDURENon end-range Maitland mobilization + proprioception training

Non end-range Maitland mobilization performed in loose position of the shoulder accompanied with 8--week long proprioception training

PROCEDURESham manual therapy technique + proprioception training

Placebo performed in loose position of the shoulder accompanied with 8--week long proprioception training

Sponsors

University of Pecs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* National Championship players in I. or II. level * at least, 10 degree deficit of glenohumeral internal rotation in the dominant shoulder compared to the non-dominant hand

Exclusion criteria

* previous trauma or surgery on the dominant shoulder * participation in any kind of treatment during the intervention period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Internal rotation of the dominant glenohumeral jointafter 8 weeksMeasurement of active internal rotation of the dominant glenohumeral joint with goniometer expressed in degree

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flexion of the dominant glenohumeral jointafter 8 weeksMeasurement of active flexion of the dominant glenohumeral joint with goniometer expressed in degree
Extension of the dominant glenohumeral jointafter 8 weeksMeasurement of active extension of the dominant glenohumeral joint with goniometer expressed in degree
Abduction of the dominant glenohumeral jointafter 8 weeksMeasurement of active abduction of the dominant glenohumeral joint with goniometer expressed in degree
Adduction of the dominant glenohumeral jointafter 8 weeksMeasurement of active adduction of the dominant glenohumeral joint with goniometer expressed in degree
External rotation of the dominant glenohumeral jointafter 8 weeksMeasurement of active external rotation of the dominant glenohumeral joint with goniometer expressed in degree
Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Indexafter 8 weeksWestern Ontario Shoulder Instability Index of the dominant shoulder
Posterior Shoulder Endurance Testafter 8 weeksMuscle strength test of the dominant shoulder expressed in Newton
Proprioception of the shoulderafter 8 weeksProprioception of the shoulder measured with plurimeter expressed in degree
Davies testafter 8 weeksMeasurement of proprioception and muscle strength test by the Davies test expressed in amount of success touch
Sportspecific proprioception testafter 8 weeksMeasurement of the precision of serving expressed in centimeter

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026