Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of an Aerosol Protective Intubation Device on Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Difficulty

First Randomised Controlled Clinical Evaluation of the Impact of Anti-Aerosol VACCIN Box on the Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Procedure

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04865081
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-04-29
Start date
2021-04-19
Completion date
2021-07-31
Last updated
2021-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation

Keywords

videolaryngoscopy, intubation box, aerosol box, COVID-19

Brief summary

The VACCIN box, an anti-aerosol intubation box for potential use on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients, was designed in order to reduce the transmission risk to healthcare workers. This study will compare the safety and the ease of use of the VACCIN box to a standard intubation in healthy participants undergoing elective surgery. It is expected that intubation times and success rate of intubation in the same circumstances will be similar with and without the use of the VACCIN box.

Detailed description

Novel ways to protect healthcare workers were developed around the world in the setting of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) and concern of potential viral transmission during aerosol generating procedures such as endotracheal intubation fueled the emergence of intubation boxes. However, a lack of details about their safety and efficiency remains. This study will evaluate safety and ease of use of the VACCIN box in participants undergoing elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation. The study design is a prospective randomized single center clinical trial comparing intubation with and without its use. It is expected that intubation times and success rate of intubation in the same circumstances will be similar with and without the use of the VACCIN box. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio after informed consent. Participants in both groups will be intubated in the same circumstances. The procedure include a midazolam anxiolysis, a rapid sequence induction without cricoid pressure of predefined dosing of remifentanil, propofol and rocuronium and monitoring of an adequate muscles paralysis and dept of anesthesia. Anesthesiologists will intubate in both groups using specific material: McGRATH videolaryngoscope with X-Blade, 8 mm endotracheal tube (ETT) for men or 7 mm for women and the Glidescope videolaryngoscope stylet inside the ETT. The experimental group will differ from the control group by application of the VACCIN box over the participant's head through which the anesthesiologist will intubate. Proper installation and removal of the VACCIN box will also be evaluated. Intubations will only be done by anesthesiologists to assure patient safety. Each anesthesiologist will be assigned a practice session using the VACCIN box on an intubation mannequin prior to the study. Time measurements throughout the procedure will be taken to obtain the outcomes measures. Vital signs, TOF, NOL index and BISpectral index monitoring are part of the protocol in order to assure an adequate anesthesia induction prior and after intubation. A total of 60 participants will be enrolled in the study (30 in each group). Sample size calculation was based on local intubation mean time with COVID-19 pandemic protocols of 45 seconds with a 15 seconds standard deviation (SD). 26 participants per group are needed considering that an intubation time that is 30% or more over the current mean would imply that the VACCIN Box slowed down the intubation with an assumed SD of 15 seconds, a significance level of 5% and power of 90%. Sample size per group was rounded up to 30 in order to overcome possible exclusion or loss. The primary outcome, the intubation time in seconds, will be tested for normal distribution with a D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test and analyzed using a Two-tailed Student t test for unpaired groups. The intubation time will be presented as mean and standard deviation \[SD\]. For the secondary outcomes, the χ2 test will be used for the comparisons of the success rate of intubation at first laryngoscopy. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the ease of intubation.

Interventions

DEVICEVACCIN box

The VACCIN box is a translucid box that can be placed over the patient's head. It has entry holes on the front and the side of the box in which nitrile gloves can be attached. The anesthesiologist can intubate with arms and hands inside the box. Its also has the capacity to create a negative pressure environment inside the box by connecting an air suction cable from the box to the OR medical aspiration line.

Sponsors

Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation * ASA status I, II or III * Good understanding of English or French

Exclusion criteria

* Known difficult airway * Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati ≥ 3, oral opening \< 2.5 cm, thyromental distance \< 6 cm, limited cervical mobility, significant abnormality of the upper respiratory tract, history of major surgery on airway or cervical area) * COVID-19 positive or unknown status * Rapid sequence contraindication * Presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria requiring a form of additional protective equipment * Claustrophobia * Chronic anxiety * BMI ≥ 35 * Allergy or intolerance to any of the study drugs * Emergent surgery * Pregnancy * Preoperative hemodynamic disturbance * Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation timeIntubation time will correspond to the time interval in seconds between the preoxygenation face mask removal and the detection of end-tidal CO2 on the anesthesia monitorSeconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of tracheal intubationImmediately after the intubationNumeric scale of 0 to 10
VACCIN box installation timeThe VACCIN box installation time will correspond to the time interval in the experimental group between the start of the VACCIN box placement over the participant's head to the removal of the preoxygenation mask before intubation.Seconds
VACCIN box removal timeThe VACCIN box removal time will correspond to the time interval in the experimental group between the initial detection of end-tidal CO2 on the anesthesia monitor to the complete removal of the VACCIN box.Seconds
Breach of air tightnessImmediately after the intubationPercentage
Success rate of intubation at first laryngoscopyImmediately after the intubationPercentage
Non-invasive blood pressure variations around tracheal intubationbefore, during and for 5 minutes after tracheal intubationmmHg
Heart rate variations around tracheal intubationbefore, during and for 5 minutes after tracheal intubationbpm
NOL variation (NOL is an index without unit) around tracheal intubationbefore, during and for 5 minutes after tracheal intubationVaries from 0 to 100, no unit
Bispectral index (BIS) variation (BIS is an index without unit) around tracheal intubationbefore, during and for 5 minutes after tracheal intubationVaries from 0 to 100, no unit
Qualitative reviews on intubation with the VACCIN boxImmediately after the intubationQualitative

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactIssam Tanoubi
i.tanoubi@umontreal.ca514 252 3400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026