Skip to content

Selective Effect of Foam Rolling and Manual Massage

Effects of Self-myofascial Release and Manual Massage on Psychometric, Behavioural and Neurophysiological Indexes of Performance and Well-being: a Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04859140
Acronym
AUTOMASSEEG
Enrollment
65
Registered
2021-04-26
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2021-04-01
Last updated
2021-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health, Subjective

Keywords

electroencephalography, electrodermal activity, flexibility, alertness

Brief summary

The present double-blinded randomized controlled design aims at comparing the effects of a full-body manual massage and foam rolling intervention. Sixty-five healthy individuals were randomly allocated to foam rolling, manual massage or a control intervention consisting in an autogenic relaxation routine.

Detailed description

Self-report ratings of perceived anxiety, muscle pain and relaxation were the psychometric outcome variables. Sit-and-reach, toes-touch and mental calculation performances were the behavioral variables. Resting-state alpha and beta power recorded using electroencephalography and galvanic skin resistance measures were the neurophysiological outcome variables.

Interventions

OTHERPsychometric ratings (Likert-scale)

Self-report of perceived anxiety and physical sensations (muscle pain, relaxation and warmth)

BEHAVIORALRange of motion measures

Sit-and-reach and toe touch tests

BEHAVIORALMental calculation task

Iterated substractions (for 2 minutes)

DEVICEResting-state electroencephalography

Alpha and beta oscillation power (4 minutes recordings)

DEVICEResting-state galvanic skin resistance measures

Skin conductance during the resting state period

Sponsors

Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Allocation concealment

Intervention model description

Three independent groups, two measurement points

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Regular practice of foam rolling (10 min routines, 2-3 times per week over the past 6 months)

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic medical conditions including functional limitations that might affect proprioception and/or pain perception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in range of motion measures from standardized flexibility testsPretest and an immediate posttest after the interventionLower back and hamstring flexibility index from sit-and-reach and toe touch tests
Resting-state electroencephalographyPretest and an immediate posttest after the interventionPower of alpha and beta neural oscillations
Changes in subjective scores (self-reports on numeric rating scales)Pretest and an immediate posttest after the interventionPerceived anxiety and physical sensations (muscle pain, warmth and relaxation) on a numeric rating scale of 10 cm (0: Complete absence of anxiety/muscle pain/muscle warmth/muscle relaxation; 10: Maximal possible levels of anxiety/muscle pain/muscle warmth/muscle relaxation)
Changes in mental calculation performancesPretest and an immediate posttest after the interventionIterated substractions for 2 minutes
Changes in physiological arousalPretest and an immediate posttest after the interventionSkin conductance during resting state periods

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026