Skip to content

Staging System in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Staging System in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04858555
Acronym
Biostaging
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-04-26
Start date
2022-12-02
Completion date
2027-12-02
Last updated
2026-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALS, Staging, Biomarker

Brief summary

Recently two staging systems have been proposed for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), based on clinical milestones The King's college clinical staging system (1) and ALS Milano-Torino Staging (ALS-MITOS) (2). Further research to validate and develop an accurate staging system in different populations will improve our understanding of its pathogenesis, disease activity and progression. General objective : To validate the two previously proposed staging system and to test the interest of considering Neurofilament biomarkers in these systems. Specific objectives: 1) To validate the two classification systems in an independent cohort of patients with ALS followed-up in the ALS expert center of Limoges (France) 2) To assess the interest of Nf biomarkers to predict neurological decline

Detailed description

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare, fatal neurodegenerative disease of the human motor system. Recently two new staging systems have been proposed for ALS, based on clinical milestones related also to the spreading pattern of the disease (1,2). Furthermore, biomarker development is still an essential component of future therapeutic development in ALS. Thus, it is also important to acknowledge the value of biomarker research in supporting or revealing fundamental pathophysiological mechanisms in ALS. The proposed staging systems: have been recently tested in two independent cohorts (3,4) with results that were not fully consistent (ii) did not considered the potential value of biomarkers.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Limoges
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ALS cases recruited for retrospectively (between) 2007 to 2016 for the retrospective cohort * ALS cases recruited for prospectively by the ALS expert center of Limoges for one year.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous neurosurgical operations * A recent history of neurotrauma * Peripheral neuropathies * ALS/frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To validate the two previously proposed staging system and to develop an accurate staging system in ALS considering Neurofilament (Nf) biomarkers.2 yearsTo validate the two previously proposed staging system and to develop an accurate staging system in ALS considering Neurofilament (Nf) biomarkers

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 27, 2026