Skip to content

Accuracy of ECOM Plus Versus Pulmonary Artery Catheter

Accuracy of the ECOM Plus Hemodynamic Monitor Versus Pulmonary Artery Catheter

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04858126
Enrollment
110
Registered
2021-04-26
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2023-09-11
Last updated
2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodynamic Monitoring

Brief summary

This Study will compare the accuracy of the ECOM Plus Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM) without the use of the arterial pressure waveform from the arterial line to 1) the current clinical standard of cardiac output measured by intermittent room temperature bolus thermodilution using a PAC, 2) the current ECOM System with the use of the arterial blood pressure waveform from a radial arterial line and 3) the Flo-Trac® System.

Detailed description

This Study will compare the accuracy of the ECOM Plus Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM) without the use of the arterial pressure waveform from the arterial line to 1) the current clinical standard of cardiac output measured by intermittent room temperature bolus thermodilution using a PAC, 2) the current ECOM System with the use of the arterial blood pressure waveform from a radial arterial line and 3) the Flo-Trac® System (Edwards LifeSciences).

Interventions

DEVICEECOM cardiac output

Measure cardiac output during perioperative period and compare to pulmonary artery catheter thermal dilution cardiac output measurement.

Sponsors

ECOM Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients able to give informed consent. * Patients undergoing surgery that would routinely require use of an endotracheal, pulmonary artery catheter and arterial catheter.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not speak English. * Patients not competent to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of ECOM Plus impedance and thermal dilution cardiac output measurements6 months.Correlation via linear regression between thermal dilution and ECOM Plus included as an R to coefficient. Cardiac output measured by thermal dilution and impedance cardiography. Management of the patients using standard thermal dilution derived CO measurement only. The ECOM Plus measurement output are for research purposes only and not to be used in the management of the patient. ECOM Plus impedance cardiography measured in the ICU when routine thermal dilution CO measurements are made. Continued impedance measurements until tracheal extubation.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026