Skip to content

The Efficacy Study of the Evidence-Based Psychological Intervention for Improving Resilience and Preventing Burnout of Residents

The Efficacy Study of the Evidence-Based Psychological Intervention for Improving Resilience and Preventing Burnout of Residents

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04857567
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-04-23
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2021-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn Out (Psychology)

Keywords

resident, surgery, ego resilience, mindfulness

Brief summary

There are few systematic studies on the working environment and mental health of residents who are at the forefront of Korean medical care. In particular, there is no scientific research on burnout prevention. Since preventing burnout of surgical residents is directly related not only to personal well-being but the health of the patients, it is necessary to care for the individual's psychological state at a social level. This psychological intervention program that is expected to improve recovery resilience in stressful situations of residents and prevent burnout is implemented, and its effectiveness is to be verified.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTSC program (Three Self-Commitment program)

1. Self-Competence program \- A program for residents who experience exhaustion due to the spirit of volunteerism and high expectations of therapeutic competency in the case of experiencing a decrease in personal achievement. 2. Self-Care program \- A program to help individuals who experience dehumanization due to emotional suppression and develop exhaustion in the process of suppressing emotions to protect themselves from excessive feelings of compassion experienced in the medical scene 3. Self-Compassion program - A program for residents who experience emotional burnout and exhaustion due to pressure of failure because medical professionals should be competent and excellent

Sponsors

Mind Works Clinical Psychologist Group
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Surgical trainees (residents and clinical fellows) at Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, who is 20 years of age or older, regardless of sex or race.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who do not consent to the study * Subjects with meditation experience

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TCI, Temperament and Character InventoryChange from baseline at right after 6 cycles of TSC program (up to 24 weeks from baseline)A test developed by Clononger, Przybeck, Svrakic and Wetzel (1994) and currently widely used in various countries such as the United States, France, and Spain. A tool that measures personality traits such as autonomy, solidarity, and self-transcendence, along with individual traits such as stimulation seeking, risk aversion, social sensitivity, and endurance. In this study, the Korean version (Min et al., 2007) of the German version of TCI-RS, the standardized test, is adapted : Based on the test result, the individual's personality characteristics of the resident are identified and applied.
MBI, Maslach Burnout InventoryChange from baseline at right after 6 cycles of TSC program (up to 24 weeks from baseline)As a test developed by Maslach and Jackson (1981), MBI is a tool that measures the sub-concepts of burnout, such as emotional burnout, dehumanization, and personal sense of accomplishment. MBI is a measurement tool used in more than 90% of empirical exhaustion research worldwide, and a test developed to measure the exhaustion of personnel providing interpersonal services including medical workers. In this study, MBI adapted and validated by Kang Jeong-hee and Kim Cheol-woong (2012) is used. Participate in the program according to the type of burnout of the client and measure the change in the burnout level of the participants before and after.
ER89, Ego Resilience ScaleChange from baseline at right after 6 cycles of TSC program (up to 24 weeks from baseline)A test developed by Block and Kremen (1996) that measures sub-concepts of self-elasticity such as interpersonal relationships, vitality, emotional control, curiosity, and optimism. In this study, a scale adapted by Park Eun-hee (1997), which was verified as 76-79, is used and measures the change in the participant's ego-elasticity before and after participating in the program.
DASS-21, Depression Anxiety StressScaleIn this study, changes in participant's psychological pain are measured at each session during the program (6 cycles of TSC program, 3-4 weeks interval, up to 24 weeks from baseline).A test developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (1995) to measure depression, anxiety, and stress corresponding to psychological distress. The internal agreement was verified as 0.87\ 0.91, 0.83\ 0.89, and 0.83\ 0.92 for depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively (Youngsun Lee et al, 2019; Jun et al, 2018).
Subjective Well-beingChange from baseline at right after 6 cycles of TSC program (up to 24 weeks from baseline)A test developed by Diener E (1985) to measure subjective satisfaction with daily life. A tool showing the internal consistency reliability of 0.87 and the test-retest reliability of 0.82.
SCS, Self-Compassion ScaleChange from baseline at right after 6 cycles of TSC program at the end of Cycle 6 (each cycle is 4 weeks, up to 24 weeks from baseline)Developed by Neff (2003) and validated as a Korean version by Kim et al. (2008) / 26 items / 6 sub-factors: self-kindness, self-judgment, universal humanity, isolation, mindfulness, hyper-identification on a 5-point scale (minimum 6 to maximum 30, the higher the score, the better the outcome)

Contacts

Primary ContactHeung-Kwon Oh, PhD
crsohk@gmail.com+82-31-787-7105

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026